Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8463Court UnsealedTestimony

court transcript: A-5925

The transcript captures a court hearing where Ms. Davis argues that the split verdict in David Parse's case is evidence of a lack of prejudice and that the jury made a deliberate decision based on the law and evidence. She references a letter from juror Catherine Conrad that supports this interpretation. The court acknowledges her argument.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: a-5925
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The transcript captures a court hearing where Ms. Davis argues that the split verdict in David Parse's case is evidence of a lack of prejudice and that the jury made a deliberate decision based on the law and evidence. She references a letter from juror Catherine Conrad that supports this interpretation. The court acknowledges her argument.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5816

The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

1.3S Financial Services Inc

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01276055

188p
Financial RecordUnknown

GO, L.L.0

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01268751

82p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5765

Ms. Brune testifies about the potential misinterpretation of a brief due to its wording, and discusses the conviction and acquittal of David Parse, expressing her belief in the jury's impartial verdict on the acquitted charges.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

Deposition transcript: A-5766

The transcript captures the cross-examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about the firm's decision-making process during jury selection, specifically regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, and whether she was believed to be a suspended lawyer. Ms. Brune testifies that they did not believe Catherine Conrad was a suspended lawyer based on her responses during voir dire.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 616-301 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 117

The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Barry H. Berke, a partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, who testified as a witness for defendant Parse. Berke provided details about his employment history and legal career. The testimony was given in a courtroom in the Southern District of New York.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.