The court maintains its decision to detain the defendant due to concerns about her risk of flight, c...
Summary
The court maintains its decision to detain the defendant due to concerns about her risk of flight, citing the complexity of extradition processes and her significant financial resources and international ties. The defendant's French citizenship and potential extradition waivers are considered, but the court remains unconvinced that these factors mitigate the risk of flight. The defendant's financial resources and history of avoiding detection also contribute to the court's decision.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package a...
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.
The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production a...
The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production and the presumption of flight. The court considers various factors, including the defendant's financial conditions and family ties, in determining whether they pose a flight risk. Ultimately, the court weighs the presumption of flight against the defendant's rebuttal evidence.
The court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing serious charges, strong ...
The court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing serious charges, strong evidence, and the Defendant's substantial resources and foreign ties as reasons to believe she is a flight risk. The Defendant had presented new information, including evidence of family ties, a detailed financial report, and waivers of her right to contest extradition, but the court found it insufficient to overcome the presumption against release.
The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requested to modify a protective order to disclose certain documents to ...
The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requested to modify a protective order to disclose certain documents to judicial officers in related civil cases. The court denied the request, finding that the defendant failed to establish good cause, but allowed limited disclosure of certain factual information under seal.
The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on September 2, 2020, allows the Defendant to make...
The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on September 2, 2020, allows the Defendant to make unsealing applications to other Courts if desired. The order is related to Case 1203660083804. The judge has signed off on the order, indicating that the Defendant has the liberty to pursue unsealing in relevant jurisdictions.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.