Skip to content
Case File
d-8697Dept. of JusticeLegal Filing

court filing or affidavit: DOJ-OGR-00001130

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00001130
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The document cites expert opinions from Mr. Perry and William Julié on extradition law, concluding that Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition to the US is likely and that her waiver of extradition rights could expedite the process.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00001130
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

court filing or affidavit: DOJ-OGR-00020048

The document presents expert testimony from Mr. Perry and Mr. Julié on extradition law, concluding that Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition to the US is likely and permissible under UK and French law. Mr. Perry's report assesses the UK extradition process, while Mr. Julié's report reviews the French extradition process. Both experts' opinions contradict certain representations made by the government at an initial hearing.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 20-0330

The document argues that the court has jurisdiction to decide on bail conditions despite a pending appeal and that Ms. Maxwell's renunciation of her foreign citizenship is a valid condition of release, contrary to the government's assertion based on a letter from the French Ministry of Justice.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 20-60083

The document is a court filing discussing the bail conditions for Ms. Maxwell, including the relevance of her renunciation of French citizenship to extradition proceedings. The filing argues that the court has jurisdiction to decide on bail and that renunciation of citizenship is a valid condition of release. The document highlights the uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of extradition law and treaty provisions between the US and France.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 20-cr-3608

The defense argues that the government's interpretation of Ms. Maxwell's actions is misleading and that her measures to protect herself and her family were necessary due to harassment and threats. The document also discusses the likelihood of extradition from France and the UK, with the defense presenting expert testimony to support their claim that Ms. Maxwell is committed to facing the charges.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 2017-00330-AUM-Document 010302 Filed 03/28/20 Page 8 of 15

The document is a court filing by the defense, responding to government allegations that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk. It argues that the government's interpretations are unfounded and that Ms. Maxwell's actions were taken to protect herself and her family, not to flee. The defense also contests the government's views on extradition from France and the UK.

1p
Dept. of JusticeCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum/Opinion Letter: doj-ogr-00020185

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters. It was written in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the US. The author asserts that the Ministry's position is not supported by law.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.