court filing: DOJ-OGR-00021857
Summary
The document discusses the court's decision regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and the USAO-SDNY, concluding that it did not bar Maxwell's prosecution. The court applied the Annabi precedent to determine the NPA's scope, finding it limited to the Southern District of Florida. The decision is significant in understanding the jurisdictional reach of NPAs.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
court filing: 178
The document analyzes whether the NPA between Epstein and the USAO-SDNY bars Maxwell's prosecution. It applies the rule from United States v. Annabi, concluding that the NPA did not bar Maxwell's prosecution as its scope was limited to the Southern District of Florida.
Court Filing: 1:20-cr-00830-PAE
The document discusses the limited jurisdiction of U.S. Attorneys to their respective districts and applies this principle to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, affirming the District Court's decision on sentencing enhancements and the length of the sentence imposed.
court filing or legal memorandum: DOJ-OGR-00021860
The document discusses the historical and statutory limits on the duties of U.S. Attorneys, emphasizing that their authority is generally confined to their own districts unless otherwise specified. It references a prior case (Annabi) as controlling the outcome in the current matter involving Maxwell. The document cites relevant statutes, such as 28 U.S.C. § 547 and § 515, to support its analysis.
court filing or affidavit: DOJ-OGR-00001130
The document cites expert opinions from Mr. Perry and William Julié on extradition law, concluding that Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition to the US is likely and that her waiver of extradition rights could expedite the process.
court filing: DOJ-OGR-00001134
The document argues that the discovery provided by the government lacks evidence supporting the charges against Ms. Maxwell, including emails, texts, and police reports, and instead contains exculpatory police reports. The few relevant documents do not significantly support the government's case. The filing appears to be part of the defense's strategy to challenge the indictment.
court filing: DOJ-OGR-00001196
The document argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's bail package is substantial and includes significant financial security, making her wealth a reason to set strict bail conditions rather than deny bail. It counters the government's claims that Maxwell is adept at hiding and thus a flight risk, and disputes the government's assertions about her spouse's financial situation and moral suasion.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.