SKMBT_60117010408240Gov. Douglas’ statement on why he refused to sign S.88, the health care reform bill
Case File
dc-325430Court UnsealedChallenges for Change results December 16, 2010
Date
March 14, 2012
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-325430
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
Preliminary Results for Challenge for Change Reductions, Act 146 Responses expected: Responses received: Regional technical center school districts: Supervisory unions and districts: 63 62 3 59 Supervisory unions and districts Response did not include $$ estimates but do not expect to meet targeted reductions Data provided are incomplete for supervisory union members Supervisory unions and districts providing complete data Targeted reductions for these S.U.'s or S.D.'s: met or exceeded targeted
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Preliminary Results for Challenge for Change Reductions, Act 146
Responses expected: Responses received: Regional technical center school districts: Supervisory unions and districts: 63 62 3 59
Supervisory unions and districts
Response did not include $$ estimates but do not expect to meet targeted reductions Data provided are incomplete for supervisory union members Supervisory unions and districts providing complete data Targeted reductions for these S.U.'s or S.D.'s: met or exceeded targeted reductions: met targeted reductions exactly: exceeded targeted reductions: FY2012 education spending less than targeted reductions by: did not meet targeted reductions: FY2012 net education spending over targeted reductions: Net targeted reductions unmet: Supervisory unions and districts not meeting reductions but estimated FY2012 education spending less than FY2011: 14 3 11 (1,982,161) 39 17,866,627 15,884,466
reductions still unmet
2
4 53
Amount FY2012
19,936,070 education spending is to
be below FY2011
19
Regional technical center school districts
met or exceeded targeted reductions: FY2012 assessments lower than targeted reduction by: did not meet targeted reductions: targeted reductions exceeded by: FY2012 technical assessments less than targeted reductions by: 1 (95,256) 2 65,708 (29,548)
Netted reductions still unmet:
15,854,918
Estimated FY2012 education spending vs FY2011
FY2012 estimated education spending for S.U.'s and S.D.'s reporting: Comparable FY2011 education spending for reporting S.U.'s and S.D.'s: Estimated decrease in FY2012:
DOE/School Finance/bcj 16Dec10
985,859,590 989,911,194 (4,051,604)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.