Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01357800DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01357800

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01357800
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
I3 January 2015 NY Corporate Credit Energy Conclusion: E&P subsector — maintain Underweight Keeping all of the preceding in mind, we believe investors should be underweight the DB HY Energy E&P Index, and maintain this recommendation. Last year, the DB HY Energy E&P Index was the worst performing sub-sector in high yield. HY Energy was down -6% for the year, which compares to overall HY being up -3.5%. In particular, we see little room for E&P subsector outperformance as these smaller HY credits can't really continue their aggressive growth strategies of the past as they try to make a path to neutral FCF. In short, we believe these credits can stay in and around FCF neutral but with little opportunity to expand the asset base and delever. We expect the best they can do is survive and reach the other side of this commodity and credit cycle. In particular, we see more value in the "higher quality" B/CCC credits like Halcon (HKUS, BUY-rated) and EXCO Resources (XCO, BUY rated). Given this lower-quality bucket has led the way down in energy, we believe upside/downside is more positively skewed there. We understand the natural tendency is for accounts to reach for quality in the BB area. Our concern with this strategy is that these names have outperformed thus far. We worry that if HY energy credits take a step down due to seasonally weak oil in 1H 15 that these names will take a disproportional hit. Therefore, we suggest that accounts stay in the BB-rated credits with upwards trajectory related to possible M&A like Cimarex (XEC, BUY-rated) and to development of new higher margin plays like Newfield (NFX, BUY-rated) in the SCOOP/STACK. We believe both of these credits still also have IG upgrade potential even in this market. Lastly, one of the most important reasons why we are maintaining our underweight stance is driven by our suspicions that early 2015 fundamental weakness in oil will mean that investors won't "miss the trade." Despite positive data points around slashed capital budgets from many HY issuers and even selective capital infusions (LINE/BX), we are moving back towards the energy sector wides seen in December. More specifically, looking at LINE bonds, which were the direct benefactor of an effective capital infusion from BX, they are trading at pre-funding announcement levels. In our minds that means the market isn't giving much credit to that increased liquidity either because there's a perception that more capital is needed or on a macro basis, that we just aren't there yet. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Page 41 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0044584 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00190768 EFTA01357800

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.