Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01357801DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01357801

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01357801
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
13 January 2016 HY Corporate Credit Energy In US natural gas, estimated development breakeven costs (excluding finding costs) have declined by roughly USD0.60/mmBtu in the last year owing to well cost reductions, more extensive use of pad drilling, and increased numbers of wells per pad. Production growth has recovered sharply from freeze-offs in November to average +4.3 bcf/d yoy. While we expect this growth to slow to only 2.0 bcf/d yoy in 2015, we believe the market would be balanced at only 1.3 bcf/d yoy growth. Therefore we expect storage normalization versus the 10-year average by the end of March, and building surpluses over the remainder of the year prior to Winter 15-16. Consequently we lower our 2015 Henry Hub price forecast to USD3.75/mmBtu. Oveivw.-.7; Production cost declines have characterized both the global thermal coal and US natural gas markets in the past year, with further USD cost declines likely in thermal coal. We expect oversupplied markets to persist over a multi-year period in thermal coal, and over the whole of 2015 in natural gas. Consequently, lower costs of production translate into a lower likelihood of supply curtailments and greater potential downside. Natural gas supply growth raises oversupply concern. An extremely cold winter in 2013.14 ended with storage gas at the lowest level in both percentage terms and absolute terms since 2003. As in 2003, this was followed by a very strong injection season with 2,770 bcf (59% of working gas capacity) added, as compared with 2,491 bcf (61%) in 2003 when measured from the end of March to the first week in November. This was facilitated by the strongest production growth rate (+3.1 bcf/d) of the last nine years apart from 2011. Of particular note is that production growth accelerated into the end of the year, despite the weakest pricing also occurring in Q4-14. [Figure 35: Dry gas production growth and Henry Hub 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 O O O moo Jan to Nov prod. growth (bcfld yoy) O Henry Hub Avg ($/mmBtu) O O Forecast O r- % 1* 2006 2008 2010 2012 I 2014 Figure 36: Dry gas production (bcticlav: 74 72 - 70 - 68 66 64 62 60 2012 2013 —2014 A November freeze-offs Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Sows illoottlerg ArencW. Pena &Ma re O aa Gas ESP &ay among i Race 11mhol Mow. 0nicA• &ft Continued strength in production growth poses the greatest risk for pricing in 2015 and we lower our price forecast to USD3.75/mmBtu on expectations that supply will exceed requirements in a normal-weather scenario. A shift towards lower costs has been facilitated by tighter well spacing and longer laterals, while we do not expect reduced drilling for tight oil to detract substantially from associated gas production growth. We expect these costs to remain lower in 2015 versus 2013. However, a continued backlog of takeaway capacity in Northeast Pennsylvania may hold back growth below what it otherwise could be, owing to negative basis relative to Henry Hub. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Page 43 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0044586 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00190770 EFTA01357801

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.