Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01613267DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01613267

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01613267
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Platform: iMessage Timezone: UTC+0000 MW 2019/01/27 Steve asked about the following will cut and paste / dunno I still think I would add to the third one to Jeffrey's suggestions — "and just want to say that victim shaming seems entirely out of place in your story and shows a lack of integrity and professionalism". 05:58:05 pm Ok makes sense 06:17:25 pm Can you ask Steve to call me 06:07:09 pm Do not get aggressive with the reporter , serves little purpose 06:14:23 pm / domm.k Not sure he will but i can try MW 06:17:30 pm Why did he say victim shaming. ? is there more info 06:18:00 pm EFTA01613267 06:18:01 pm He says I was accused of something i didn't do and therefore am a victim 06:18:22 pm And that the bank allowed me to be harassed by these allegations 06:18:46 pm There is nothing more to know 06:18:56 pm I don't even know what you were accused of? 06:19:11 pm I don't either 06:19:16 pin My travel and emails were all Investigated 06:19:33 pm I've heard everything from Jim misuse of public funding to support me to a romantic relationship 06:20:03 pm Whoopsie 06:20:29 pm EFTA01613268 Or both as they relate to each other 06:20:49 pm Gates paid me and my expenses unless they were of direct benefit to bank and then bank paid expenses. Jim never saw or approved any expenses only the chief of staff. I never even did travel or accessed the portal or had an account to claim expenses. All fine through chief of staff 06:21:58 pm Done through chief of staff 06:22:03 pm Steve says whatever you say is best and that's fine if too aggressive 06:22:30 pm I never had access to any system or portal or reporting and had to submit everything I did through chief of staff. Not Jim. 06:23:20 pm There is a very very small window for a win. Which means no name or identifiers , if not we try ti minimize the damage. Any agressiveness and he can make it salacious. No need. , no upside and you are not in the pulpit 06:24:01 pm He did not pay me a salary or give me a raise or promotion or any benefit 06:24:05 pm Yes got it 06:24:16 pm Steve says you know best 06:24:26 pm EFTA01613269 Forget about what he didn't do. What were the allegations. ?! 06:24:27 pm I don't know? Nothing was ever filed against me 06:24:46 pm I think i was part of an investigation against him 06:25:06 pm What I know is that when he fired the iNdia office director a guy named Onno Ruehl that I've never met - that guy got very angry and started threatening everyone in the office 06:25:51 pm And he sent a complaint to the board that he suspected him and I were having a romantic relationship and said all my travel should be examined and requested they do that's he wanted justification for my trips and to know my hotels and room numbers and for any trips wiim his room numbers too or at least that's what I was told 06:26:54 pm The board did and the ethics committee did and investigation and they found nothing. The two trips I had taken w Jim in a few years I shared rooms with other people and didn't have much contact wiim. Don't think we were on same flights and the teams were 20+ ppl travel entourage. 06:28:32 pm melz. . we need answers of course you know. We can't prepare a counter unless we know the story. If he asks , which he will , did you have a romantic relationship with kin. What are you going to answer? If he says there were allegations that you had a romantic relation , ? What is your answer. A categorical denial? Did you travel toghther. ? let me make it clear. There was no romantic relationship. None zero. ... 06:29:24 pm V Sent EFTA01613270 No romantic relationship. 06:29:39 pm Ok how to say that to him with total clarity there isn't and wasn't 06:30:04 pm I've known him 17 years so I am close to his family/kids etc. so there's a different familiarity. Its not romantic but I know Jim and his life very well. 06:32:00 pm We worked together at the WHO And a lot of back and forth at the Gates foundation and through his work e partners in health. 06:32:33 pm It's not romantic at all. Steve is just as good of friends w him as I am. Although right now I'd say steve and I are both disappointed in him 06:33:39 pm Tell me what words I can and should use 06:34:04 pm Was trying to think of a time where jim and i were ever even alone at work or in an office and I cant think of one - always staff around. My 1:1 always had chief of staff and usually the speechwriter or one of his PM. 06:38:56 pm Never had adjoining rooms w him. Never went to a hotel room with him. Never spent the night at his house. He never spent the night at my house. Just never even a hint if anything unusual or out of work bounds. 06:40:41 pm His admin and his chief of staff (.he had a few chiefs of staff while i was there) were always around him and me. 06:41:23 pm EFTA01613271 0 Anyway waiting for anesthesia to start this case 06:42:07 pm ../ Read EFTA01613272

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.