Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01860859DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01860859

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01860859
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: GMAX[ From: Jeffrey epstein Sent: Thur 6/9/2011 5:46:46 PM Subject: Re: Vanity Fair - I have something else to add I just want to make sure you thinks its ok and then it will go - the add and change are in red plse advise Ok Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jun 9, 2011, at 1:2I PM, GMAX •c > wrote: Forwarded Messa•e From: Reply-To: < Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:32:23 -0400 To: G Ross Gow < Subject: Re: Vanity Fair Good to go. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: GMAX < Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:19:51 -0400 To: Brian Basham< >; Ross Gow< Subject: Re: Vanity Fair Dear Brian and Ross Bellow in caps are my proposed answers. I have no intention of talking to Ed. My plan here is just to set some of the record straight — ie I am no longer w/Je and have not been for years..it is of course longer than the 7 but 7 years with another man should at least clear up that point Re the other answers..lets discuss and change them if you see fit and once we have them in a state that we like I will contact devonshires to have an opinion and then revert to you to send to Ed Thx G Dear Ross, Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment on and answer: 1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or anywhere else? Do they still see each other? Does Epstein help support Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does she still love him? EFTA_R1_00260940 EFTA01860859 MS MAXWELL DOES NOT SHARE ANY HOMES ANYWHERE WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUPPORT MS MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE PAST 7 YEARS 2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York with his arm around M. Standing off to one side in the photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the photo? If not, who did? MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING TAKEN AND GIVEN WE ARE TALKING AN EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURPRISING 3. According to Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as Epstein's "sex slave" when she was 15 years old and arranged for her to see Andrew three times—at Jeffrey Epstein's homes in London and New York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James—where, said, she'd been "sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers, including royalty." Would Ghislaine please comment on this assertion by MS MAXWELL MET MS WHEN SHE BELIEVES SHE WAS 17 AND SHE WAS LIVING WITH HER FIANCE. MS WAS HIR EFTA_R1_00260941 EFTA01860860 4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about Andrew's rendezvous with in Ghislaine Maxwell's London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell left the Duke of York and alone for several hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous with SEE ABOVE 5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support story—flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727 and Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else was onboard? TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT GOING TO ANY GIVEN PLACE AND WHO WAS ON BOARD OR NOT ON ANY GIVEN PLANE AT ANY GIVEN TIME FOR FLIGHTS THAT ALEDEGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC 6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent EFTA_R1_00260942 EFTA01860861 girls. MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE BUT MS MAXWELL HAS NEVER SEEN THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AT ANYTIME AND INDEED HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN PROPERLY ATTIRED WHEN EVER SHE HAS SEEN HIM. NOR IS SHE AWARE OF ANY SUCH PARTIES. That's it for now. I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine. All the best, Ed End of Forwarded Message EFTA_R1_00260943 EFTA01860862

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01317277

10p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for th...

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED /

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED / FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) MATERIAL BSF RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENA v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), S.D.N.Y. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Sealed Order, 19 Misc. 149 (Apr. 9, 2019) PLEADINGS AND ORDERS 2016-2018 Pleadings (Related Sealed) 2015-2018 Orders (Related Sealed) DISCOVERY Rule 26 Disclosures (All) Discovery Requests and Responses (served) PRODUCTIONS Plaintiff's Production 000001 009349 Defendant's Productions MAXWELL 00001 01364 Non-Party Productions CASSELL 000001 014402 MAR-A-LAGO 0001 0607 000001 000558 000001 000009 VICTIMS_REFUSE_SILENCE 0001 0091 Deposition Transcripts (ALL) April 22, 2016 De osition of Ghislaine Maxwell May 3, 2016 Deposition of May 18, 2016 Deposition of May 20, 2016 Deposition of Sky Roberts May 24, 2016 Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller May 26, 2016 Deposition of Dr. Steven Olson June 1, 2016 Deposition Transcript of Juan Alessi June 3, 2016 Deposition of David Rodgers

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02722033

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.