Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02658484DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02658484

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02658484
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 2:29 PM To: David Schoen Subject: Re: Hello where are you based. ? On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:06 PM, «mailto > wrote: That is and always has been, of necessity, the bread and bu=ter of my practice. As you might imagine, in organized crime cases (= represent 2 of the purported bosses of the 5 families and have represente= alleged head of Russian mafia, Israeli mafia, and a Canadian the govt cla=med was the biggest mafioso in the world) the lawyet generally makes his c=se by undermining the government's not through a direct case with pris=ine witnesses. I start preparing for every case, whether o.c., white collar= or civil litigation, from the first client interview, by planning my cros=-examination. For me, at least, a cross-examination centered approac= is the only (and by far the best) way to prepare and proceed for many rea=ons requiring a longer discussion and perhaps not so interesting to most p=ople. I think most lawyers with any significant criminal defense p=actice or perhaps any litigation practice fancy themselves to be adroit cr=ss-examiners. That has not been my experience and you can fill in th= names you already know among criminal defense lawyers in my view. M=st often an exercise in ego, to the client's detriment, lack of prep (=tself often a function of ego), and not listening to the witness (lawyer o=ten stuck to a script = missed opportunities in cross►. Running out now to speak now to a group of senior citizens a=out a case i did at the Supreme Court and other Israel related issues. David Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com <http://mail.mobile.aol.com> On=Sunday, February 19, 2017 jeffrey E. <[email protected]=m> wrote: we wi=l see. in fact i just asked who is good at cross. =C24> ? are you? On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, < > wr=te: I see now the media is using this acosta nomination and the Max=ell case in NY to once again get your name in the mix. I sure hope t=e lawyer(s) in this Maxwell case is someone who cross-examines for a livin= if this case goes to trial. The case presents a real opportunity fo= a hard-hitting cross-examiner to undermine credibility with respect to a =itness/plaintiff who apparently has a lot of baggage to work with. l=hope the lawyer doesn't add his or her EFTA_R1_01905120 EFTA02658484 name to the list of people who =hrow you under the bus in the process. Sorry to see your name dredge= up again. Take care, David riginal Message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» To: <mailto > > Sent: Wed, Jan 18, 2017 2:38 pm Subject: Re: Hello Same On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:11 PM < >= wrote: Just ch=cking in to say happy new year and see how things are going. I stopp=d in and saw our mutual friend in NY last week and it reminded me of you.=C24, I hope things are going well for you and that you have a great new y=ar free from a lot of the hassles from the media and former "friends&=uot; and free from litigation. Take care. David</=iv> Sent fr=m AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com <http://mail.mobile.aol.com> Q=A0 please note The information contained in this=communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the=addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or=copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibite= and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in err=r, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]<=a>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including=all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01905121 EFTA02658485 40=A0 please note The information conta=ned in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privi=eged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for th= use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, d=sclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strict=y prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communic=tion in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-ma=l to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof,<=r>including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01905122 EFTA02658486

Related Documents (6)

House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases

The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative val Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault. References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses. Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act

The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments

103p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01974883

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email to attorney David Schoen referencing Justice Breyer and U.S. Attorney's office

The passage is a routine attorney‑client email from Jeffrey Epstein to his lawyer, containing vague comments about Justice Breyer’s views on sentencing and a generic complaint about the U.S. Attorney’ Email sent by Jeffrey Epstein on Feb 22, 2010 to attorney David Schoen. Mentions a recent panel in DC where Epstein sat next to Justice Stephen Breyer. Comments that Justice Breyer believes the sente

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI notified Epstein victims of CVRA rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ misapplied victim‑rights statutes

The passage reveals that the FBI sent victim‑rights notices to Epstein’s alleged victims months before a non‑prosecution deal, implying the agency assumed CVRA applicability and later reversed its pos FBI sent a notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, stating her rights under the CVRA. The notice preceded the non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein by over three months. The Department of Jus

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.