EFTA00027346

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 8

Reference

efta-efta00027346

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Jack Scarola To: " < Cc: ' " Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:42:11 +0000 > ' telephone number is Multiple messages left at that number have elicited no response. On Mar 9, 2020, at 3:34 PM, wrote: Jack, Thanks for letting us know. Is there any contact nformation for Ms. you can provide us with? Thanks, From: Jack Scarola Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 12:24 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: My messages to have not been responded to. I have no objection to your direct contact with her. On Mar 9, 2020, at 10:32 AM,I I wrote: Jack, I'm following up on our conversation from last week to ask if you've had a chance to speak with Ms. regarding a potential meeting with our team. We'd very much appreciate a chance to meet with her, and would be happy to address any questions you or she might have if that's helpful. If you no longer represent Ms. please let us know so that we can reach out to her directly. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 ********** ********** ***** *** ******** *************** **************** ***************** ****** I Privileged and Confidential I Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510- 2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be EFTA00027346 attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. **************************** ******** ******************** *********** **************** ******* EFTA00027347

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020703

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid DOJ Oversight Questions

The passage reveals that a federal prosecutor's office recused itself from the high‑profile Epstein victims’ rights case and notes a pending DOJ review prompted by Senate questioning of AG nominee Wil Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims’ rights case. The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee Will

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020865

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid Calls for DOJ Review

The passage reveals a recusal by a federal prosecutor in the high‑profile Epstein case and notes that AG nominee William Barr was pressed to investigate DOJ handling. This provides a concrete lead—rec Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in early The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nom

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.