Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00066949DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00066949
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Prisons Metropolitan Detention Center 80 29" Street Bros*, New York 11232 April 29, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: This letter is written in response to your April 28, 2021, Order seeking the following information regarding an alleged incident involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Register No. 02879-509, at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York (MDC Brooklyn) on April 24, 2021: 1. An inventory of the items seized from Ms. Maxwell in the incident that occurred on April 24, 2021 shall be provided by email to defense counsel only; 2. A representation indicating whether any of the seized materials were duplicated in any fashion and what investigation was undertaken in order to determine this information; a. A representation indicating

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Prisons Metropolitan Detention Center 80 29" Street Bros*, New York 11232 April 29, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: This letter is written in response to your April 28, 2021, Order seeking the following information regarding an alleged incident involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Register No. 02879-509, at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York (MDC Brooklyn) on April 24, 2021: 1. An inventory of the items seized from Ms. Maxwell in the incident that occurred on April 24, 2021 shall be provided by email to defense counsel only; 2. A representation indicating whether any of the seized materials were duplicated in any fashion and what investigation was undertaken in order to determine this information; a. A representation indicating whether Ms. Maxwell is permitted to bring confidential legal materials to in-person meetings with defense counsel without those materials being seized; and b. What steps have been or will be taken to ensure the confidentiality of Ms. Maxwell's lawyer-client communications. At no point during or after Ms. Maxwell's April 24, 2021, legal visit were any materials seized and retained by MDC Brooklyn staff. Those materials that defense counsel gave to Ms. Maxwell contrary to MDC Brooklyn's legal visit procedures were confiscated by staff and return Page 1 of 2 EFTA00066949 to defense counsel on April 25, 2021. In addition, none of Ms. Maxwell's legal materials, including those items given to her during the April 24, 2021, legal visit, were photocopied. Supervisory staff discussed the incident with the staff involved and reviewed video surveillance footage. Ms. Maxwell may bring any legal materials she wishes to carry from her housing area to her in-person legal meetings with defense counsel. Pursuant to Institutional Supplement BRO- 5267.09A, Inmate Visiting Correctional Services, an inmate's legal material are visually inspected for contraband by the Visiting Room Officer. To ensure inmates do not bring unauthorized materials into the institution, inmates are only allowed to remove those legal materials they brought to the legal visit. All legal visits are subject to visual monitoring only. In addition to in-person legal visits, Ms. Maxwell may request unmonitored legal calls through Unit Team and she meets with defense counsel via video-teleconferences Monday through Friday for five (5) hours per day in a private room subject to visual supervision. MDC Brooklyn will continue to abide by said procedures to ensure attorney-client communications remain confidential. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Staff Attorney MDC Brooklyn Federal Bureau of Prisons P2ge 2 of 2 EFTA00066950

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 74 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 74 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 23, 2020 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide an update regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC") pursuant to the Court's Order dated August 25, 2020. (Dkt. No. 49). Over the past three months, the Government has had multiple conversations with MDC legal counsel regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement. This update is based on information provided to the Government by MDC legal during those conversations. Last week,

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 78 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 78 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Malin Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 December 1, 2020 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties jointly submit this letter in response to the Court's November 24, 2020 order directing the parties to meet and confer regarding the defendant's request that the warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC") report directly to the Court and counsel on the defendant's conditions of detention. (Dkt. No. 76). Over the past week, the Government has spoken with MDC legal counsel regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement and has tried to gather additional information regard

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' y• < To: BOBBI Cc:' Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:58 +0000 (USANYS)" Bobbi, Thank you for including me on this email. I understand from my conversation with MDC legal counsel today that MDC staff is continuing to monitor temperatures throughout the facility, including in the area where Ms. Maxwell is housed. My understanding is that the temperature where Ms. Maxwell is housed remains within the limits prescribed by BOP policy and that the MDC does not expect this week's activities to affect the temperature in Ms. Maxwell's cell. That said, they will continue to monitor the temperature and take appropriate action if it falls below prescribed limits. As has previously been conveyed via letter from the Government to defense counsel dated October 8, 2020, the MDC's assessment continues to be that Ms. Maxwell's current cell is the most appropriate placement for Ms. Maxwell both for her safety and the security of the institution.

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

January 25, 2021

January 25, 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Prisons Metropolitan Detention Center 80 291: Street Brooklyn. New York 11232 BY ECF The Honorable Alison). Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Marvell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, Reg. No.02879.509 Dear Judge Nathan: This letter is written in response to Order granted on January 15, 2021, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell, Reg. 02879-509., an inmate currently confined at the Metropolitan Detention Center (”MDC") in Brooklyn, New York. The MDC Brooklyn respectfully requests that Your Honor vacate the Order given MDC Brooklyn was not given the opportunity to object to defense counsel's claims, although the objection had been reiterated to the U.S. Attorney's Office numerous times. Defense counsel expressed various concerns regarding Ms. Maxwell's confinement limiting her access to discovery. However, Ms. Ma

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.