Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00076593DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00076593
Pages
10
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CIVIL CASE NO.: ‘51t 3DS . )56 GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Plaintiff, vs. ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN. DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC. a New York Limited Liability Company. Defendants. 18f103 ):101213dflS COMPLAINT Plaintiff GHISLAINE MAXWELL (-Maxwell.), through her undersigned attorneys. by ‘‘a) of her Complaint against Defendants is STA OF JEI FREY I.. LPSTLIN (the "Estate"). DARREN K. INDYKE. in his capacity as Executor of the LSTATI. Of- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ("Indykel. RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as Executor or the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN (-Kahn"), and NES. LI_C, a New York Limited Liabilit Company ("NES, LLC.), alkgcs as follows: NATURE OF THIS ACTION I. This is an action for indemnification for and advancement of the attorneys' fees

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CIVIL CASE NO.: ‘51t 3DS . )56 GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Plaintiff, vs. ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN. DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC. a New York Limited Liability Company. Defendants. 18f103 ):101213dflS COMPLAINT Plaintiff GHISLAINE MAXWELL (-Maxwell.), through her undersigned attorneys. by ‘‘a) of her Complaint against Defendants is STA OF JEI FREY I.. LPSTLIN (the "Estate"). DARREN K. INDYKE. in his capacity as Executor of the LSTATI. Of- JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ("Indykel. RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as Executor or the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN (-Kahn"), and NES. LI_C, a New York Limited Liabilit Company ("NES, LLC.), alkgcs as follows: NATURE OF THIS ACTION I. This is an action for indemnification for and advancement of the attorneys' fees. security costs. costs to find safe accommodation, and all other expenses Maxwell has reasonably incurred and will incur by reason of her prior employment relationship with Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein") and his affiliated businesses in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed EFTA00076593 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 2 of 10 suit, proceeding, or investigation relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses, and his alleged victims. PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 2. Plaintiff Ghislaine Maxwell is an adult citizen of the United States. 3. Jeffrey E. Epstein was a resident of the Virgin Islands. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein was created following Epstein's death and is domiciled in the Virgin Islands. 4. Defendant Darren K. Indyke is an Executor of the Fstate. 5. Defendant Richard D. Kahn is an Executor of the Estate. 6. Defendant NES. LIC. is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of New York on or about August 13. 1993. 7. This Court ha jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 4 V.I.C. § 76. 8. Pursuant to 4 V.I.C. § 78, venue properly lies in the United States Virgin Islands. and in the Division of St. Thomas and St. John. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. Erom approximately 1999 thromth at least 2006. Maxwell was employed by Epstein individually. and by several of his affiliated businesses. including. but not limited to. the C.O.U.Q. Foundation. NES LLC. New York Strategy Group. JEGE: LLC. JEGE Inc.. and LSJ, LLC. 10. While under Epstein's employ. Maxwell was responsible for managing Epstein's properties. including properties located in New York. Paris. Florida. New Mexico. and the U.S. Virgin Islands. During the course of their relationship, including while Maxwell was in Epstein's employ, Epstein promised Maxwell that he would support her financially. EFTA00076594 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 3 of 10 12. Epstein made these promises to Maxwell repeatedly, both in writing and in conversation. 13. Epstein restated these promises when Maxwell was in the process of leaving Epstein's employ to start a new business of her own. 14. Epstein assured Maxwell that even if her business ventures failed he would support her financially. 15. In approximately 2001, Maxwell began transitioning to a more limited employment role for Epstein and his affiliated businesses. In approximately 2004, Maxwell received a typewritten letter from Epstein with a handwritten note asking Maxwell to remain in Epstein's employ and promising that no matter what Maxwell chose to do, Epstein would always support Maxwell financially. 16. Sometime thereafter. Epstein pleaded guilty in a Florida state proceeding to a klony charge of solicitation of pmstitution invoking a minor. 17. Since the time of Epstein's Florida gate proceeding to the present, Maxwell has incurred legal fees and expenses in connection with various suits, proceedings. and investigations relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses. and his alleged victims. IS. Consistent with his repeated promises. Epstein indemnified Maxwell and advanced legal fees and settlement costs when they were incurred in connection with a lawsuit filed lay against Epstein in 2017 (Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein. et al.. I 7-cv-006 I 6-JGK). 19. Consistent with his repeated promises, Epstein also paid Maxwell's legal bills incurred in connection with a civil suit filed by against Epstein in 2009. EFTA00076595 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 4 of 10 20. Epstein's promise is further evidenced by the fact that Epstein indemnified and advanced legal fees and expenses for a number of other employees in other various lawsuits relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses, and his alleged victims. 21. Indyke, in his capacity as an Executor of the Estate, also made assurances to Maxwell that Maxwell's legal fees and obligations would be reimbursed by Epstein and the Estate, and that Maxwell's legal fees and expenses would be paid going forward. 22. Indyke told Maxwell that her legal fees would be paid because she would not have incurred any legal expenses but for Epstein's alleged misconduct, and that Epstein's promises would be honored. 23. Epstein %%as found dead on August 10.2019 in New York. 24. On August 15. 2019. Indyke and Kahn filed a petition for probate of Epstein's last will and tostninent with thu Probate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. Division of St. Thomas and St. John. 25. Maxwell has incurred and will continue to incur significant legal ices. personal security costs, and other costs in connection with legal suits. proceedings. and investigations relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses. and his alleged victims. 26. Maxwell receives regular threats to her life and safety. which have required her to hire personal security services and find safe accommodation. 27. Maxwell is entitled to indemnification and advancement of expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with Epstein and his affiliated businesses. including attorneys' fees, as well as security costs and costs of finding safe accommodation, all of which are ongoing, extensive, and directly related to the pending suits, proceedings. and investigations EFTA00076596 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 5 of 10 concerning Epstein's alleged misconduct. These expenses will be ongoing due to the extensive global coverage and interest in these events and proceedings. 28. By letter dated November 22, 2019. Maxwell submitted a claim to the Estate, addressed to Indyke and Kahn, requesting that the Estate honor its obligation to provide indemnification as requested in this action. 29. The Estate has not honored or even formally responded to Maxwell's claim. 30. Maxwell was compelled to file this Complaint because the Estate has not honored her claim for indemnification as requested in this action. 31. Given that Maxwell was forced to seek judicial intervention to vindicate her right to indemnification by the Estate, she is entitled to recover the reasonable lees incurred in this action to vindicate that right. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT ONE Indemnification (Promissory Estoppel / Contractual) 32. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 33. On more than one occasion. Epstein made a clear and unambiguous promise to Maxwell that he would indemnify Maxwell and advance and expenses incurred by reason of her prior employment relationship with him and his affiliated businesses. 34. Maxwell reasonably and justifiably relied on Epstein's promises and put her trust in Epstein that he would fulfill his promises. 35. As such, Maxwell elected to leave Epstein's employ to pursue her own business ventures because she trusted that Epstein would continue to support her financially. EFTA00076597 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 6 of JO 36. The Estate has failed to uphold Epstein's promise to indemnify and advance expenses incurred by reason of Maxwell's employment relationship with Epstein and his affiliated businesses. 37. Maxwell's reliance on the Estate's promises was a substantial factor in causing Maxwell harm as alleged herein. 38. For the foregoing reasons, Maxwell is entitled to indemnification and advancement from the Estate of expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with Epstein and his affi I iated businesses. COUNT TWO Indemnification (Common Laws 39. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 40. The employment relationship between Maxwell and Epstein formed a legal and special relationship that gives rise to a duty on the part of the Estate to indemnify Maxwell for any expenses incurred by reason of Maxwell's employment relationship with Epstein and his affiliated businesses. 4I. Maxwell had no involvement in or knowledge of Epstein's alleged misconduct, but nonetheless has been required to pay significant legal fees. personal security costs, and other expenses because the alleged events occurred while she was employed by Epstein and his affiliated businesses. EFTA00076598 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 7 of 10 42. The suits, proceedings, and/or investigations for which Maxwell seeks indemnification were instituted against Maxwell solely because she was an employee of Epstein and his affiliated businesses. 43. Maxwell incurred these legal fees and expenses as a direct result of Epstein's acts and/or omissions. 44. For the foregoing reasons. Maxwell is entitled to indemnification and advancement from the Estate of expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with Epstein and his affiliated businesses. COUNT THREE Indemnification (NES, LLC and Other Entitiesi 45. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though hill) set forth herein. 46. Maxwell was employed as a manager by NES. Ilk. 47. Upon information and belief. the corporate organizational documents for NITS. LLC entitle Maxwell to mandator) indemnification and advancement of legal fees. personal security costs. and other expenses incurred by reason of her employ went relationship with NES. LTC. including expenses incurred in connection with the pending suits. proceedings. and investigations concerning Epstein's alleged misconduct. 48. Maxwell has incurred significant legal fees. personal security costs, and other expenses b) reason of her employment relationship with NES. L.I.C. 49. Upon information and belief, as of September 2006. Defendant Kahn was the Comptroller of NES, LLC. EFTA00076599 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 8 of 10 50. By letter dated November 22, 2019, Maxwell requested indemnification from NES, LLC for the legal fees, personal security costs, and other expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with NES, LLC, among other entities, and never received a response. 51. By the same letter dated November 22, 2019, Maxwell requested copies of documents setting forth applicable indemnification and/or advancement rights and policies, including any operating agreements for NES. LLC, and never received a response. 52. Maxwell was also employed by several of Epstein's other entities. including. but not limited to. the C.O.U.Q. Foundation, New York Strategy Group, JEGE LLC. JEGE Inc.. and LSJ. LLC. 53. Upon information and belief, the corporate organizational documents of these other entities likely provide a right or indemnity to Maxwell for expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with those entities. 54. Maxwell has incurred significant legal fees. personal security costs. and other expenses by reason of her employment relationship with these other entities. 55. Maxwell requested indemnification from the Estate for such fees, costs. and expenses by reason of her prior employment relationship with these other entities. and was refused. 56. For the foregoing reasons. Maxwell is entitled to indemnification and advancement from NES. LLC and/or the Estate of expenses incurred by reason of her employment relationship with NES. LLC. Epstein. and/or any of his other entities with whom Maxwell was affiliated or employed. EFTA00076600 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 9 of 10 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Maxwell respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in her favor and against the Estate and grant her the following relief: A. an Order declaring that Maxwell is entitled to indemnification and advancement from the Estate and/or NES, LLC the reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses she has incurred by reason of her employment relationship with Epstein, NES. LLC, and his other affiliated businesses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection with any threatened, pending. or completed suit. proceeding. or investigation relating thereto, security costs and costs of finding safe accommodation incurred as a result thereof, and all other expenses Maxwell has reasonably incurred and will incur in the future by reason of her prior employment relationship with Epstein. NES, LI.C. and his other affiliated businesses; 13. an Order declaring that Maxwell is entitled to prejudgment interest on the reasonable attorneys' lees and other expenses for which the Estate and/or NES. 1.I.0 has failed to advance or indemnify Maxwell: C. an Order declaring that Maxwell is entitled to recover from the Estate and/or NES. LLC the reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this action; D. post-judgment interest: and E. all such other and further relief to which Plaintiff is entitled at law and in equity or as this Court may deem just and proper. EFTA00076601 CIVIL CASE NO.: ___ Page 10 of 10 Dated: March 12. , 2020 Qt,INTAIROS, PRIETO. WOOD & BOYER, P.A. Attorneys for Plaint 9300 S. Dadcland Blvd., 4th Floor Miami, FL 33156 Kyle R. Waldner. Es . V.I. Bar No.: 1038 EFTA00076602

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CIVIL CASE NO.: 012P'41-156. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Plaintiff, vs. ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY F.. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC. a New York Limited Liability Company, Defendants. COMPLAINT ; -;.t.;;;Nt ; 1U1103 ra :X 2 THIS.\O11/). 7. ['his i; ;in action thr indemnilleativo thr and ad\ anc n cnt of the attorneys' fees. security costs. costs to Iln. safe accommodation. and all other expenses N'lax‘‘ell has reasonably incurred and will incur by reason of her prior employment relationship with Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein') and his affiliated businesses in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed EFTA00094890 CIVIL CASE NO.: Page 2 of 10 suit, proceeding, or investigation relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses, and his al

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

WILMERHALE

WILMERHALE September 2, 2020 FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO 28 C.F.R. § 16.8 AND 5 U.S.C. § 552 By E-mail And By FTP a Esq. Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Anjan Sahn1 (t) Re: August 11, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; August 16, 2019 and September 3, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JP Morgan Chase; October 9, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A. And All Affiliates Dear Mr. In response to the above-referenced subpoenas, on behalf of our client JPMorgan Chase ("JPMorgan" or the "Firm"), we submit the enclosed encrypted zip files containing documents bates labeled JPM-SDNY-00054737 through JPM-SDNY-00055530. As you know, on November 15, 2019, we produced wire data for certain accounts related to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell (JPM-SDNY-00000004 through JPM-SDNY-00000011). We have since identified addit

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Memorandum

Memorandum Subject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment char in Jeffrey Epstein, Min a/k/a' JEGE Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. The proposed indictment contains 60 counts and seeks the forfeiture of Epstein's Palm Beach home and two airplanes? The FBI has information regarding Epstein's whereabouts on May 16th and May 19th and they would like to arrest him on one of those dates. Epstein is considered an extremely high flight risk' and, from information we have received, a continued danger 'The second revision amends the Jane Doe numbering system to correspond with the most recent indictment. It also removes the references to the overt acts and substantive allegations related to each

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00178386

EFTA00178386 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Fti./No. OLY-80/z SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON X DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTISI YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: April 15, 2008 1:00pm YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following documents) or object(s): ANY AND ALL NOTES, LETTERS, CARDS, GIFTS, PAYMENTS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS YOU HAVE RECEIVED FROM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF JEFFREY EPST IMI L. ANY AND ALL PHOTOGRAPHS, WHETHER PRINTED OR DIGITAL, OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR ANY AND ALL E-MAILS, INSTANT MESSAGES, CHATS, TEXT MESSAGES, VOICEMAILS, OR TELEPHONE MESSAGES THAT YOU HAVE SENT TO AND/ORRECEIVED FR

310p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USANYS)"

To: Cc: ' " , USANYS)" Subject: RE: FAA Question Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:42:10 +0000 Importance: Normal HMI I hope all's well. We've had a chance to review the records, and we'd like to learn more about one aircraft in particular. From our conversation, it sounds like the best next step is to contact the title companies involved. Can you help us identify the right title companies for the below aircraft? Thanks, ** On December 30, 2008, Sikosrksy Aircraft helicopter, S-76C-2, serial number 760750, tail number N750A was sold to; Air Ghislaine Inc 103 Fould Road, #202 Wilmington, Delaware 19803 302-636-1956 The registrant was Larry VISOSKI, he signed as Director of Aviation On February 11, 2010, Air Ghislaine Inc changed their name to Shmitka Air Inc. In March 2010, Air Ghislaine Inc changed the tail number from N750A to N722JE. On the 8050-64 the signature is not legibile but it looks similar to the signature of Lawrence VISOSKI. He signed as Director of Operatio

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

WILMERHALE

WILMERHALE March 3, 2020 FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO 28 C.F.R. § 16.8 AND 5 U.S.C. § 552 By E-mail (Without Enclosures) And by FedEx Esq. Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Anjan Salmi •1 (.0 Re: August 11, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A., Chase Bank USA. N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; August 16, 2019 and September 3, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JP Morgan Chase Dear Mr. In response to the above-referenced subpoenas, on behalf of our client JPMorgan Chase ("JPMorgan" or the "Finn"), we submit the enclosed encrypted disc containing documents bates labeled JPM-SDNY-00003382 through JPM-SDNY-00054724. Enclosed at JPM-SDNY-00003382 through JPM-SDNY-00054724 are account statements related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and . For your convenience, Appendix A includes a chart identifying the account numbers, account names, and date ranges of account statements by Bat

9p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.