Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00080575DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00080575
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: ' (USANYS)" ci To: =Mr)" < (USANYS)" Cc: ' >, " (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:50:50 +0000 attorney Just Audrey, thanks. From: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:50 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) < >; Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to attorney (USANYS) (USANYS) < Will do. Should I cc anyone else from the brass on the email to Audrey, or ok to go straight to her? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:50 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to - I think I probably would. Thanks From: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:47 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to >; attorney attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS)< (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Will do, thanks. Want me to revise the subpoena rider to just seek the agreement first? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:03 AM To: Cc: ) ‹ ; Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to >; attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Subject to any discussion wor

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' (USANYS)" ci To: =Mr)" < (USANYS)" Cc: ' >, " (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:50:50 +0000 attorney Just Audrey, thanks. From: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:50 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) < >; Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to attorney (USANYS) (USANYS) < Will do. Should I cc anyone else from the brass on the email to Audrey, or ok to go straight to her? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:50 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to - I think I probably would. Thanks From: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:47 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to >; attorney attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS)< (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Will do, thanks. Want me to revise the subpoena rider to just seek the agreement first? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:03 AM To: Cc: ) ‹ ; Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to >; attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Subject to any discussion worth having over the questions below, Audrey is prepared to approve this, so please put together a very short email to her along the lines of our email to us, below, so she can respond approving this. Thanks From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 9:39 AM To: Cc: ) Subject: RE: Friendly subpoena to >; attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS) < EFTA00080575 Thanks, Two follow up questions — first, I assume there is no protective order issue here we need to be mindful of? Second, in light of the ongoing litigation over the BSF subpoena — and given that we do seem to have some knowledge of what's in the file here and, indeed, we want a very specific thing from that file — is there are virtue to specifically asking for what we want in the rider, rather than doing our typical "all non-privileged documents..." Happy to chat if that would be helpful, and this will also need to be approved by Audrey, so I'll give her a heads up that it's coming. But we should probably try to cut this before Monday if possible. From: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 12:39 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: Friendly subpoena to attorney (USANYS) < (USANYS) < The Maxwell team would like to send the attached "friendly subpoena" to attorney During our interviews in Florida, informed me that he has a copy of the settlement agreement between and Epstein, which resolved 2009 civil suit against Epstein. is willing to provide us with a copy of the agreement, but he indicated that he believes he needs a subpoena before he can do so. His firm has already provided us with copies of all other court filings and deposition transcripts from the civil case voluntarily. The settlement agreement resolving the case is relevant to our ongoing investigation into Maxwell's participation in the abuse of Happy to discuss. Thanks, EFTA00080576

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.