Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00080577DOJ Data Set 9Other

To: Jack Scarola

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00080577
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Jack Scarola Cc: na, Subject: Subpoena Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:37:51 +0000 Attachments: 2021.03.29,_subpoena_to_Jack_Scarola.pdf (USANYS)" Jack, Thanks very much for speaking over the weekend. As discussed, attached please find a subpoena seeking the settlement agreement from lawsuit against Epstein. As I mentioned, if you need additional time to look into confidentiality restrictions before responding to the subpoena, that is completely fine with us. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza 0007 EFTA00080577

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Jack Scarola Cc: na, Subject: Subpoena Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:37:51 +0000 Attachments: 2021.03.29,_subpoena_to_Jack_Scarola.pdf (USANYS)" Jack, Thanks very much for speaking over the weekend. As discussed, attached please find a subpoena seeking the settlement agreement from lawsuit against Epstein. As I mentioned, if you need additional time to look into confidentiality restrictions before responding to the subpoena, that is completely fine with us. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza 0007 EFTA00080577

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew

The filing outlines a contested claim that Alan Dershowitz was defamed in a victim‑rights case and references unverified allegations that former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Dershowitz argues the allegations against him were fabricated and surfaced only in a 2014 joinder mo The brief cites Jane Doe #3’s sworn statements claiming Bill Clinton and Al Gore were on Epstein’s

18p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C.M. A., CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON Plaintiff, r lEEEREIY EPSTEIN and■ Defendants, v. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action For Time Certain With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action (DE 64), and states: I. Introduction and Argument Plaintiff, in the instant matter, did not draft her own Response to the Motion to Stay. Instead, Plaintiff incorporated Plaintiffs' responses to the motion to stay in certain related matters (DE 64), and adopted those arguments as her own.' Plaintiffs Response in Opposition challenging the stay should not

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.