Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00094582DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00094582
Pages
8
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. INSTRUCTIONS TO FOCUS GROUP EFTA00094582 Summary of Indictment The Indictment contains three counts. or "charges," against GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant. Count One of the Indictment charges the defendant, with conspiring—that is, agreeing— with others to transport a minor in interstate and foreign commerce, with intent that the minor engage in sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense. Count One relates to multiple minor victims during the time period 1994 to 2004. Count Two of the Indictment charges the defendant with conspiring to engage in sex trafficking of minors. Count Two relates to multiple minor victims during the time period 2001 to 2004. Count Three of the Indictment charges the defendant with sex trafficking of minors. Count Three relates to Minor Victim-4, during the time period 2001 to 2004. 2 EFTA00094583

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. INSTRUCTIONS TO FOCUS GROUP EFTA00094582 Summary of Indictment The Indictment contains three counts. or "charges," against GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant. Count One of the Indictment charges the defendant, with conspiring—that is, agreeing— with others to transport a minor in interstate and foreign commerce, with intent that the minor engage in sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense. Count One relates to multiple minor victims during the time period 1994 to 2004. Count Two of the Indictment charges the defendant with conspiring to engage in sex trafficking of minors. Count Two relates to multiple minor victims during the time period 2001 to 2004. Count Three of the Indictment charges the defendant with sex trafficking of minors. Count Three relates to Minor Victim-4, during the time period 2001 to 2004. 2 EFTA00094583 Burden of Proof and Multiple Counts In a moment, I will describe those three counts in more detail. Before I do, however, let me explain that the Government has the burden of proving the defendant's guilt on each count by a preponderance of the evidence. That means that the Government must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is guilty of each count. You must consider each count separately and return a separate verdict of guilty or not guilty for each. Whether you find the defendant guilty or not guilty as to one offense should not affect your verdict as to any other offense charged. You have no doubt heard that a defendant's guilt in a criminal case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. That is not the standard we are applying in today's exercise. As I said, the question for you today is whether it is more likely than not that the defendant is guilty of each count. 3 EFTA00094584 Count One: Conspiracy to Transport Minors As I mentioned, Count One of the Indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to transport minors between 1994 and 2004. In order to satisfy its burden of proof with respect to the allegation of conspiracy, the Government must establish each of the following elements: First, the existence of the conspiracy charged in the Indictment; that is, as to Count One, a conspiracy to transport a minor with intent that the minor engage in sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense. You should know that a conspiracy just means that the defendant you are considering agreed with at least one other person to violate the law. Second, that the defendant intentionally and knowingly became a member of the conspiracy. That is, she knowingly participated in the conspiracy with knowledge of its object and with an intent to further the aims of the conspiracy. The defendant's mere presence at the scene of the alleged crime does not, by itself, make her a member of the conspiracy. Similarly, mere knowledge or acquiescence, without participation, in the unlawful plan is not sufficient. In other words, knowledge without agreement and participation is not sufficient. On the other hand, it is not necessary for the Government to show that a defendant was fully informed as to all the details of the conspiracy in order for you to infer knowledge on her part, and it does not matter whether the defendant's role in the conspiracy may have been more limited than or different in nature or in length of time from the roles of her co-conspirators, provided she was herself a participant. With respect to Count One, in order to sustain the charge that the defendant conspired to transport an individual with intent that the person engage in sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, the Government must prove that the purpose of the conspiracy was to transport an individual with intent that the individual engage in sexual activity for which a 4 EFTA00094585 person can be charged with a criminal offense, which contains three elements: First, that the defendant knowingly transported an individual in interstate or foreign commerce. This means that the Government must prove that the defendant knew both that she was causing the individual to be transported, and that the individual was being transported in interstate commerce. The Government does not have to prove that the defendant personally transported the individual across a state line or international border. It is sufficient to satisfy this element that the defendant acted through an agent or was engaged in the making of the travel arrangements, such as by purchasing tickets necessary for the individual to travel as planned. Second, that the defendant transported the individual with the intent that the individual engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. Count One alleges sexual activity for which a person could be charged with a crime under the criminal law of New York. Specifically, a person commits sexual abuse of a minor in the third degree when he or she subjects another person to sexual contact without the latter's consent. Under New York law, "sexual contact" means any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party. Also under New York law, a person less than seventeen years old is incapable of consent. Third, the individual must be less than seventeen years old, and the defendant must know that the individual is less than seventeen years old. It is not a defense to the crime of sexual abuse of a minor in the third degree that the minor voluntarily participated or consented. 5 EFTA00094586 Count Two: Conspiracy to Commit Sex Trafficking Count Two charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit sex trafficking between 2001 and 2004. As with Count One, in order to satisfy its burden of proof with respect to the allegation of conspiracy, the Government must establish the following elements: First, the existence of the conspiracy charged in the Indictment; that is, as to Count Two, a conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. Second, that the defendant intentionally and knowingly became a member of the conspiracy. That is, she knowingly participated in the conspiracy with knowledge of its object and with an intent to further the aims of the conspiracy. With respect to Count Two, in order to sustain the charge that the defendant conspired to commit sex trafficking, the Government must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the purpose of the conspiracy was to commit sex trafficking, which contains four elements: First The defendant knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained a person. Those terms have their ordinary, everyday meanings. Second: The defendant knew that the person was under the age of eighteen years. Third: The defendant knew the person would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act. The term "commercial sex act" means "any sex act, on account of which anything of value is given to or received by any person." The thing of value may be money or any other tangible or intangible thing of value that may be given to or received by any person, regardless of whether the person who receives it is the person performing the commercial sex act. It is not required that the person actually have performed a commercial sex act, and it is not a defense that the person consented. Fourth: The defendant's acts were in or affecting interstate commerce. I instruct you 6 EFTA00094587 that acts and transactions that cross state lines, or which affect the flow of money in the stream of commerce to any degree, however minimal, are acts and transactions affecting interstate commerce. For instance, it affects interstate commerce to use products that traveled in interstate commerce. Proof of actual travel is not required. 7 EFTA00094588 Count Three: Sex Trafficking of Minor Victim-4 Count Three charges the defendant with the sex trafficking of Minor Victim-4 between 2001 and 2004. I have just reviewed the four elements of sex trafficking with you. In order to satisfy its burden of proof with respect to Count Three, the Government must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed those elements in the sex trafficking of Minor Victim-4. In addition, you may find the defendant guilty of Count Three under a theory of liability called "aiding and abetting," which permits a defendant to be convicted of a specified crime if the defendant, while not herself committing the crime, assisted another person or persons in committing the crime. To aid or abet another to commit a crime, it is necessary that the Government prove that the defendant willfully and knowingly associated herself in some way with the crime committed by the other person and willfully and knowingly sought by some act to help the crime succeed. 8 EFTA00094589

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 1113/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter dated November 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 403. The Government is hereby ORDERED to confer further with MDC legal counsel and file a letter regarding Defendant's transportation to the courthouse for proceedings in this matter on or before November 8, 2021. The Court hereby authorizes the letter to be filed under seal because such information may implicate security concerns. The Court will also confer with the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York and with the District Executive regarding transportation of the Defendant for upcoming in court proceedings and trial. With respect to legal mail, the Court requires MDC Legal Counsel to consider what additional steps can b

2p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
OtherUnknown

FRENCH REPUBLIC

FRENCH REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF JUSTICE APPEAL COURT OF PARIS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF PARIS COURT OF JUSTICE Paris, July 8, 2020 DIVISION Section P4 - Public Prosecution Service for Minors. The Public Prosecutor To Prosecutor-General at the Appeal Court of Paris. SUBJECT: Request for international legal assistance in criminal matter addressed to the United States authorities concerning the investigation related to Jean-Luc BRUNEI., and others, in connection with the "EPSTEIN case". N/REF : prosecution number : 19 235 449 V/REF : APPLICANT AUTHORITY The Public Prosecutor at the Paris Court of Justice. AUTHORITY ADDRESSED TO The competent authorities of the United States of America. Having regard to the accord between the European Union and the United States of America dated June 25, 2003 which entered into force on February 1, 2010 ; Having regard to the Article 14 of the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance between France and the United States dated December 10,

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 214 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/19/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: An arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment is scheduled to take place on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Given significant public interest, a video feed of the proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room and Courtroom 9C at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in either the Courtroom or the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. Due to social distancing requirements, seating will be limited to approximately 100 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no ad

3p
OtherUnknown

LBUCmaxl

120 LBUCmaxl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 20 CR 330 (AJN) Jury Trial New York, N.Y. November 30, 2021 8:50 a.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER -and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE Also Present: District Judge , FBI NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00068582 121 LBUCmaxl 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Jury not present) THE COURT: Looks like we have everybody. Matt

287p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.