Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00098997DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00098997
Pages
3
Persons
8
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 4, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Christian Everdell, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Bobbi Stemheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street-4th Fl. New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Pursuant to the Court's November I, 2021 order, we write to provide you with categories and exemplars of statements that are admissible as co-conspirator statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E). Because no attorney can predict the verbatim testimony of a witness, please note that the following statements are simply the Government's understanding of the sum and substance of the statement. A

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 4, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Christian Everdell, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Bobbi Stemheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street-4th Fl. New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Pursuant to the Court's November I, 2021 order, we write to provide you with categories and exemplars of statements that are admissible as co-conspirator statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E). Because no attorney can predict the verbatim testimony of a witness, please note that the following statements are simply the Government's understanding of the sum and substance of the statement. And for that same reason, while we have identified examples of co-conspirator's statements that we expect to offer for the truth of the matters asserted therein under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), we also list certain examples of statements made by co-conspirators that we expect will not be offered for the truth of the matters asserted therein. We list these additional examples in an abundance of caution, in the event that the witness's statement varies from our expectation in a manner that makes some part of the statement admissible for its truth under Rule 801(d)(2)(E). EFTA00098997 Page 2 1. Statements made by Epstein to friends and family of Minor Victims Epstein had one-on-one conversations with the friends and family of Minor Victims, generally on the telephone. For example: 2. Statements by Epstein to his employees Epstein made statements to his employees, including statements that relate to their duties, provide background information or history about the conspiracy, or promote efforts to conceal the conspiracy. For example: In or about 2005, Epstein told an employee witness ("CC-1"), who was identified as a co- conspirator in the Government's October 11, 2021 letter, that the defendant used to find girls for him. In or about October 2005, Epstein and an employee ("CC-2"), who was identified as a co- conspirator in the Government's October II, 2021 letter, told CC-1 to go to his Palm Beach house to help someone who was coming to take the computers from Epstein's Palm Beach House. 3. Statements made by CC-2 to the Minor Victims or their families CC-2 placed many calls to Minor Victims or their friends and family in order to schedule massage appointments. The Government expects several witnesses to testify about receiving those calls. For instance: 4. Statements made by Jeffrey Epstein to the Minor Victims or in their presence The Government expects to offer numerous statements made by Jeffrey Epstein to the Minor Victims, as well as statements that Epstein made in their presence. Many of these statements consist of (a) asking Minor Victims questions about their lives and discussing their future plans, or (b) asking them about their sexual preferences, and thus would not be offered for the truth of the matters asserted therein. In other instances, however, Epstein made statements about himself that would be admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), among other reasons. For example: EFTA00098998 Page 3 Very truly yours, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorneys EFTA00098999

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Juror ID:

FINAL Juror ID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -V- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. INSTRUCTION SHEET Dear Juror: X 20 Cr. 330 (MN) JURY QUESTIONNAIRE Please call on November 15, 2021 after 6:00 p.m. for further reporting instructions. Please bring this instruction sheet with you to the courthouse if you are instructed to return. -1- EFTA00077967 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY JURY ASSEMBLY ROOM 160 SECTION I: JUROR INFORMATION ALL FIELDS IN THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED TO ENSURE YOU RECEIVE YOUR PAYMENT FOR SERVICE Full Name: •Address: Home Phone # Last Fiat M I. Street Address City State Zip Code Aportment/Unit Business Phone I Cell Phone I *NO P.O. BOXES. YOU MUST PROVIDE A RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS FOR MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT. Social Security # PLEASE SELECT ONE NOTE: ATTENDANCE LETTERS WILL BE MAILED 21 DAYS AFTER SERVICE PRINT ATTENDANCE LET

31p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78

Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAppellee, Defendant-Appellant, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) APPENDIX Volume IV of VIII (Pages App.-0777 to App.-0852) Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys or e en ant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00076383 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Paget of 78 Docket Entries App.-0001 Order regarding Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion to Reconsider July 23, 2020 Ruling, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1079) App.-0777 Notice of Appeal, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1081) App.-0781 Non-Redacted Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley In Support of Plaintiff's

78p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A EFTA00090463 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The SiMoJ. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plana New York, New York 10007 October 11. 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Christian Everdell, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 33 West 19th Street-4th Fl. New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Counsel: We write to notify you that the Government may seek to introduce certain evidence at trial. In i articular. the Government ma offer certain exhibits at trial that demonstrate that. We are producing t ese propos e 'its t y, i . : GX 401 through 404, GX 409 through 410, and GX 413. wr i tie o owing e it In addition, please be advised that the Government may call as a witness

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. PARK DIETZ AND DR. ELIZABETH LOFTUS DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Assistant United States Attorneys Of Counsel EFTA00070837 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 I. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS FROM DR. DIETZ 1 A. Background 1 B. Legal Standard 5 C. Discussion 8 I. Response to the Opinions of Dr. Rocchio 8 2. Opinions as to Hindsight Bias 11 3. Opinions as to the "Halo Effect" 14 4. Opinions as to "Pathways to False Allegations of Sexual Assault" 17 5. Opinions Regarding the Credibility of Witnesses 21 6. Opinions Regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms 22 II. CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED EX

41p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 161

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 161 EXHIBIT E EFTA00084366 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 2 of 161 New Jeffrey Epstein accuser says he molested her at 13, told her to wear children's underwear January 18.2020 I 12-04am I Updated Jeffrey Epstein A woman claiming she was Jeffrey Epstein's "first-known victim" says she was sexually abused by the now-dead pedophile — who called himself her "Godfather" — when she was 13 years old. Jane Doe met Epstein and his friend, Ghislaine Maxwell. in the summer of 1994 at Michigan's Interlochen Arts Camp, where she was In voice training, according to newly filed court papers suing Epstein's estate and Maxwell. The duo quickly took her under their wing, taking her to movies and on shopping trips in her home state of Florida and all the while grooming her for abuse, the Manhattan federal court suit says. Epstein "started to slowly display his pedophilic ways when shopping with Doe

161p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Assistant United States Attorneys Of Counsel EFTA00088802 Table of Contents PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 4 I. The Court Should Admit the Testimony of Dr. 4 A. Applicable Law 5 B. Discussion 9 1. Dr. )pinions on Coercion and Attachment are Admissible 10 2. Dr. Opinion on the Relationship Between Trust and Victim Awareness of Their Abuse is Admissible 22 3. Dr. MINtDpinion on the Long-Term Consequences of Abuse is Admissible 23 4. Dr. Opinion About the Significance of the Presence of Third Parties is Admissible 25 5. Dr. Opinion on Delayed Disclosure is Admissible 27 II. The Evidence Contained in

84p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.