Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00102398DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00102398
Pages
3
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:02:53 +0000 Inline-Images: hnage001.jpg Yes, and it's a good question! Credit to her for checking. The answer is that a defendant can't be subject to more punishment than whatever the penalty was at the time of the offense. So, normally we're prosecuting people who committed crimes recently, so whatever the current law is applies to them. Here, the maximum sentences for these offenses were different back in 1994-97, which is the time period of our charges, and the maximum sentences were less at that time than they are now. From Sent: Monday, July 06, 2020 11:00 To: Subject: Fwd: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Would you happen to know? Thx Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: CAL < Date: July 6, 2020 at 10:53:55 AM EDT To: Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Hi a Sorry to bother but I saw on Maxwell detention memo that "the de

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:02:53 +0000 Inline-Images: hnage001.jpg Yes, and it's a good question! Credit to her for checking. The answer is that a defendant can't be subject to more punishment than whatever the penalty was at the time of the offense. So, normally we're prosecuting people who committed crimes recently, so whatever the current law is applies to them. Here, the maximum sentences for these offenses were different back in 1994-97, which is the time period of our charges, and the maximum sentences were less at that time than they are now. From Sent: Monday, July 06, 2020 11:00 To: Subject: Fwd: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Would you happen to know? Thx Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: CAL < Date: July 6, 2020 at 10:53:55 AM EDT To: Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Hi a Sorry to bother but I saw on Maxwell detention memo that "the defendant faces up to 35 years' imprisonment if convicted". But I saw one of the charges is US Code Title 18 2423 which carries a max sentence of life... I am confused. Do you know why she faces up to 35 years and not life? Thanks very much, Kind regards, AFP 18 U.S. Code § 2423.Transportation of minors (a)TRANSPORTATION WITH INTENT To ENGAGE IN CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACrIVITY.— A person who knowingly transports an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, with intent that the individual engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which EFTA00102398 any person can be charged with a criminal offense, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life. From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:57 AM To: 'I Subject: RE: Press Conference Advisory, Thursday, July 2, 2020, 12:00 p.m. Hi Thanks so much for this! Do you know how many years of jail Maxwell risks because of this six counts? Approximately at least? Kind regards, AFP From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:52 AM Subject: Press Conference Advisory, Thursday, July 2, 2020, 12:00 p.m. United States Attorney Southern District of New York There will be a press conference today at 12:00 p.m. to announce charges against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in the sexual exploitation and abuse of multiple minor girls by Jeffrey Epstein. The press conference will be livestreamed on Facebook @USAOSDNY. Relevant documents are attached. Please note: In order to comply with social distancing protocols and provide for the safety of all attendees and participants, press personnel should arrive at least 30 minutes before the start of the press conference, wear face coverings, submit to temperature screening, and comply with seating and standing demarcations. WHO: Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York , Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation WHAT: Press Conference WHEN: Thursday, July 2, 2020 12:00 p.m. WHERE: U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York CONTACT: EFTA00102399 NOTE: Please silence all cell phones, PDAs, and pagers before start of press conference. MANDATORY COVID-19 PROTOCOLS WILL BE IN PLACE. CLICK HERE FOR GUIDANCE. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. IF YOU HAVE UESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE PRESS OFFICE AT EFTA00102400

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

LBUCmaxl

120 LBUCmaxl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 20 CR 330 (AJN) Jury Trial New York, N.Y. November 30, 2021 8:50 a.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER -and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE Also Present: District Judge , FBI NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00068582 121 LBUCmaxl 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Jury not present) THE COURT: Looks like we have everybody. Matt

287p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR

Subject: Fw: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:51:10 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: U.S._v._Ghislaine_Maxwell_Indictment.pdf; Ghislaine_Maxwell_Indictment_PR.pdf Inline-Images: image001.png Hi who should we include for this release in the monthly news bulletin? ublic Affairs Specialist FBI New York Sent: Thursday, July 2, 20201:20 PM Subject: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Southern District of New York GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS Maxwell is Alleged to Have Facilitated, Participated in Acts of Abuse Additionally Charged With Perjury in Connection With 2016 Depositions Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Will

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.