Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00103423DOJ Data Set 9Other

Fact Witness Travel Request (Domestic Witness Travel)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00103423
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Fact Witness Travel Request (Domestic Witness Travel) AUSA, see instructions below. To: SDNY Victim/Witness Unit From: Date: August 5, 2021 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Court Docket No: 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) USA° No: 2018R01618 Witness Name: Witness DOB: (Name/DOB as printed here will be forwarded to travel agency and then to TSA and must exactly match the witness's driver's license or other travel ID or TSA will not permit the witness wily) Witness Address: Witness TelNos (mobi Witness e-mail: Witness Needed to Appear in SDNY on Date: August 16, 2021 Time: 1 PM Witness Needed to Appear for: Trial ( ) Date: Grand Jury ( ) Date: Trial Prep ( X ) Date: August 16, 2021 at 1 PM, and August 17, 2021 at 10 AM Estimated Dates Witness will Arrive: August 15, 2021 (any time) Depart: August 17, 2021 (evening) Is the person a Fact Witness and not an Expert Witness? (Yes/No): Yes Current Federal Civilian or Military Employee? (Yes/No): No Is the Witness Fa

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Fact Witness Travel Request (Domestic Witness Travel) AUSA, see instructions below. To: SDNY Victim/Witness Unit From: Date: August 5, 2021 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Court Docket No: 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) USA° No: 2018R01618 Witness Name: Witness DOB: (Name/DOB as printed here will be forwarded to travel agency and then to TSA and must exactly match the witness's driver's license or other travel ID or TSA will not permit the witness wily) Witness Address: Witness TelNos (mobi Witness e-mail: Witness Needed to Appear in SDNY on Date: August 16, 2021 Time: 1 PM Witness Needed to Appear for: Trial ( ) Date: Grand Jury ( ) Date: Trial Prep ( X ) Date: August 16, 2021 at 1 PM, and August 17, 2021 at 10 AM Estimated Dates Witness will Arrive: August 15, 2021 (any time) Depart: August 17, 2021 (evening) Is the person a Fact Witness and not an Expert Witness? (Yes/No): Yes Current Federal Civilian or Military Employee? (Yes/No): No Is the Witness Facing Criminal Charges? (Yes/No): No Does the Witness Reside Outside the Continental United States? (Yes/No): No Is this Witness a Victim-Witness? (Yes/No): No Hotel Required? (Yes/No): Yes Has the Witness advised you of any unusual travel expenses? (Yes/No): No Unusual expenses of fact witnesses can include special travel arrangements care for dependent child or incapacitated family member left at home kennel fees for pets rev. 2019.11.19 EFTA00103423 necessary travel companion extra baggage (more than one bag) Please describe the unusual expense: For Victim-Witness Coordinator: I. (For UEFW other than travel, which must be itemized and approved in advance:) This UEFW is apparently within VWC approval authority and tentatively approved pending receipt(s) for UEFW expenses (Yes/No): 2. Other VWC comments: VWC Initials and Date: Instructions to AUSA: Use this form for all fact witnesses within the U.S. except government employees and military personnel, for whom a Request for Armed Forces or Government-Employee Witness should be used. For foreign witnesses, use the International Witness Travel Request. Complete an Early or Extended stay memo if the witness is being brought in more than 3 business days prior to court/CI testimony. Witnesses may only be brought in under the FEWS appropriation for grand jury testimony that has been scheduled and where the witness is expected to testify before the grand jury; court testimony; or preparation for same. Any other witness travel, e.g., for investigative interviews, must be covered by the investigating component from litigative funds. See Ed Tyrrell. See generally DOJ Instruction 1300.01.01 (approved 9/28/2018) and sources referenced therein. rev. 2019.11.19 EFTA00103424

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

LBUCmaxl

120 LBUCmaxl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 20 CR 330 (AJN) Jury Trial New York, N.Y. November 30, 2021 8:50 a.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER -and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE Also Present: District Judge , FBI NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00068582 121 LBUCmaxl 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Jury not present) THE COURT: Looks like we have everybody. Matt

287p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Defense on November 1, 2021, noticed eight expert witnesses. Def. Br., Ex. 1 ("Notice"). Two of those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony of the remaining six experts. The Defense filed a response on November 19, 2021. The Court addresses the motion to preclude Dr. Hall in this separate opinion. It will address the other five e

17p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)'

From: (USANYS)' To: " CRM" II II Cc: " (CRM)" Subject: R -: n epee ent: Prince n rew: e sa to to to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:58:39 +0000 lane-Images: image001.png Thanks, The below looks good to us. On the penalties: Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423 (transportation of minors) — maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422 (coercion and enticement) — maximum penalty is 5 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591 (sex trafficking) — maximum penalty is 40 years' imprisonment From: (CRM) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 5:49 AM (USANYS) C (CRM) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. Has the witne

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: DAILY BEAST; How Did !rump and Clinton Pal Jeffrey Epstein Escape #Me loot

From: To: Cc: Subject: DAILY BEAST; How Did !rump and Clinton Pal Jeffrey Epstein Escape #Me loot Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 20:08:44 +0000 Importance: Normal How Did Trump and Clinton Pal Jeffrey Epstein Escape #MeToo? Call him Weinstein 1.o: The billionaire with famous friends (Kevin Spacey, Woody Allen) was a secret pervert who used his power and influence to groom teens for abuse. As the Harvey Weinsteins of the world get their comeuppance in the press and in court, another serial predator walks free. Last month, after a flood of allegations by Hollywood actresses, Weinstein was indicted on rape and criminal sex act charges in New York. The disgraced Hollywood executive stands accused of assaulting one woman in 2004 at Miramax headquarters in TriBeCa and raping another woman at a Midtown hotel nine years later. He has pleaded not guilty to these crimes. Since Weinstein's reign of terror was exposed and ignited a #MeToo reckoning other powerful men have found themselves

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.