Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00103691DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 250 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 3

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00103691
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 250 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDIa DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/26/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed schedules for pretrial disclosures and pretrial motions practice. Dkt. Nos. 229, 230. Having considered the parties' respective positions, the Court hereby sets the schedule below, which it deems reasonable and fair. For purposes of this scheduling order, the trial commencement date shall mean the date that the Court will request from the Clerk's Office as the trial commencement date. It does not include any period involving the issuance of a jury questionnaire that may predate that trial commencement date. As explained at the April 23, 2021 conference, the Court is considering the Defendant's request for a continuance

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 250 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDIa DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/26/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed schedules for pretrial disclosures and pretrial motions practice. Dkt. Nos. 229, 230. Having considered the parties' respective positions, the Court hereby sets the schedule below, which it deems reasonable and fair. For purposes of this scheduling order, the trial commencement date shall mean the date that the Court will request from the Clerk's Office as the trial commencement date. It does not include any period involving the issuance of a jury questionnaire that may predate that trial commencement date. As explained at the April 23, 2021 conference, the Court is considering the Defendant's request for a continuance, but until such a request is resolved the parties shall presume that the Court will request July 12, 2021 as the trial commencement date. See also Dkt. No. 221. With that in mind, the Court hereby sets the following schedule: Government expert witness disclosure are due April 23, 2021 (agreement of the parties) Supplemental Pretrial Motions that pertain only to the new charges raised in the S2 indictment (agreement of the parties): o Defense supplemental motions are due May 7, 2021 o Government's response is due May 21, 2021 EFTA00103691 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 250 Filed 04/26/21 Page 2 of 3 o Defense replies are due May 28, 2021 Disclosure of the alleged victims referenced in the S2 Indictment: May 17, 2021 (agreement of the parties) Jencks AcU3500 materials, Rule 404(b) notice, Giglio materials, the Government's witness list. and co-conspirator statements are due seven weeks before the trial commencement date The Government's exhibit lists and marked exhibits are due five weeks before the trial commencement date Defense Expert Witness disclosure is due four weeks before the trial commencement date The Defendant's Rule 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) disclosures and witness list are due three weeks before the trial commencement date Motions in limine are due four weeks before the trial commencement date (agreement of the parties) o Responses to motions in limine are due two weeks before the trial commencement date (agreement of the parties) Requests to Charge, Verdict Sheet, and Proposed Voir Dire are due three weeks before the trial commencement date (agreement of the parties) The Court will address a process and schedule for the parties' proposals regarding a jury questionnaire by separate order. Finally, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer on the Government's proposal that the Defendant submit witness statements pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.2 at EFTA00103692 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 250 Filed 04/26/21 Page 3 of 3 least four weeks in advance of trial. The parties are further ORDERED to submit a joint letter laying out their respective positions and proposals within one week of this Order. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 26, 2021 New York, New York cAsuw Q. ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge EFTA00103693

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 1113/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter dated November 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 403. The Government is hereby ORDERED to confer further with MDC legal counsel and file a letter regarding Defendant's transportation to the courthouse for proceedings in this matter on or before November 8, 2021. The Court hereby authorizes the letter to be filed under seal because such information may implicate security concerns. The Court will also confer with the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York and with the District Executive regarding transportation of the Defendant for upcoming in court proceedings and trial. With respect to legal mail, the Court requires MDC Legal Counsel to consider what additional steps can b

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FRENCH REPUBLIC

FRENCH REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF JUSTICE APPEAL COURT OF PARIS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF PARIS COURT OF JUSTICE Paris, July 8, 2020 DIVISION Section P4 - Public Prosecution Service for Minors. The Public Prosecutor To Prosecutor-General at the Appeal Court of Paris. SUBJECT: Request for international legal assistance in criminal matter addressed to the United States authorities concerning the investigation related to Jean-Luc BRUNEI., and others, in connection with the "EPSTEIN case". N/REF : prosecution number : 19 235 449 V/REF : APPLICANT AUTHORITY The Public Prosecutor at the Paris Court of Justice. AUTHORITY ADDRESSED TO The competent authorities of the United States of America. Having regard to the accord between the European Union and the United States of America dated June 25, 2003 which entered into force on February 1, 2010 ; Having regard to the Article 14 of the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance between France and the United States dated December 10,

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 214 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/19/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: An arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment is scheduled to take place on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Given significant public interest, a video feed of the proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room and Courtroom 9C at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in either the Courtroom or the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. Due to social distancing requirements, seating will be limited to approximately 100 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no ad

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

LBUCmaxl

120 LBUCmaxl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 20 CR 330 (AJN) Jury Trial New York, N.Y. November 30, 2021 8:50 a.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER -and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE Also Present: District Judge , FBI NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00068582 121 LBUCmaxl 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Jury not present) THE COURT: Looks like we have everybody. Matt

287p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.