Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
(USANYS)"
To:
(USANYS)" alMIE>
Cc:
(USANYS)" •MIMIMIN>
Just got out of a meeting. Once I re-group, free until 3. Or after about 3:30. . . .
Original Messa e
From:
(USANYS)
>
To:
USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)
If you have two minutes to discuss something else, let me know.
Original Messa e
From:
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)....
To:
Ok.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 1:04 PM,
(USANYS) aMIN>
wrote:
al
and
'ust stopped by. They feel strongly, so I drafted the bullets I just sent for-
conversation with
> From:
(USANYS)
> Sent: Frida September 6, 2019 1:03 PM
> To:
(USANYS) ale
> Cc:
(USANYS)
> Subject: MCC
— Per our discussion, some bullets below:
> • We have just gotten a copy from OCME of their full autopsy report, which includes not only their medical
findings, but attaches all of the documents/materials they relied upon in reaching their conclusion.
> • By way of background, and to assist the OCME it completing its autopsy, we provided them certain materials
that OCMCE had requested from our investigation, including a draft FBI 302 of our interview of a key MCC
witness, Lt.=, who was on duty at the time the body was found.
> • We understand that OCME has gotten a request for the autopsy from Epstein's next of kin, his brother Mark
Epstein, and it is OCME's standard practice to release the report to next of kin where the cause of death is
EFTA00103792
suicide (by contrast, OCME typically does not release the autopsy where the cause of death is homicide out of
respect for the ongoing criminal investigation).
> • Because we provided OCME with certain material now included in its report — and because we obviously are
conducting an ongoing criminal investigation — we have asked OCME to make certain redactions before
producing its report to Epstein's brother. In particular, we have asked them to redact/withhold the FBI 302 and
other documents we obtained from the MCC, and to redact any references to those documents and materials in
whatever they do produce.
> • OCME has indicated its willingness to comply with this request and has asked us to propose redactions,
which we have now done. A copy of the full repot, with our proposed redactions, is attached.
> • We plan to provide our proposed redactions to OCME on Monday, September 9. We understand they plan to
produce the report, as redacted, to Epstein's brother at some point next week.
> • The material we are asking OCME to redact is quite sensitive — it includes, for example, the names of the
prison guards who we are investigating (names that have not previously been made public), key details and
statements made by ow- potential targets and others at the time the body was found, a draft FBI 302 of a potential
key witness, and sensitive MCC documents that would be important to our ability to bring charges.
> • We are also unlikely to make our request for redaction permanent — we would likely be willing to revisit the
issue if and when a charging decision has been made.
> • As noted, OCME has indicated to us that it will comply with our request to partially redact its report before
providing it to Epstein's next of kin.
> • We separately wanted to flag for you that in an unredacted portion of the report, OCME makes reference to a
"handwritten note" that was found in Epstein's cell at the time of his death, although the report also makes clear
it was not a suicide note.
> • We have a photograph of the note but it is difficult to read. It appears to be a list of grievances about the
conditions at MCC — including about the food, the showers and the presence of bugs -- but we agree with the
OCME assessment that it does not appear to be a suicide note
> • We are in the process of obtaining a copy of the note itself and expect to have that on Monday.
> <OCME_Reportn
Epstein_Redboxed v2.pdf>
EFTA00103793