Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00103794DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00103794
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: MCC Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:12:46 +0000 Thanks. Will calashortly. From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, September 6, 20191:10 PM To: USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: MCC Also, from a quick search, I found a formal advisory opinion from the New York State Committee on Open Government that includes, in relevant part, the following: If the autopsy report was performed in New York City by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, It has been held that §557(g) of the New York City Charter has the effect of a statute and that It exempts records from the Freedom of Information Law [see Mu[lady v. Bogard, 583 NYS 2d 744 (1992); Mitchell v. Borakove, Supreme Court, New York County, NYU, September 16, 1994). https://docs.dos.ny.gov/cooglitext/f9880.htm That is consistent with what appears on the OCME web page which indicates that only next of kin can request an autopsy. From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 1

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: MCC Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:12:46 +0000 Thanks. Will calashortly. From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, September 6, 20191:10 PM To: USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: MCC Also, from a quick search, I found a formal advisory opinion from the New York State Committee on Open Government that includes, in relevant part, the following: If the autopsy report was performed in New York City by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, It has been held that §557(g) of the New York City Charter has the effect of a statute and that It exempts records from the Freedom of Information Law [see Mu[lady v. Bogard, 583 NYS 2d 744 (1992); Mitchell v. Borakove, Supreme Court, New York County, NYU, September 16, 1994). https://docs.dos.ny.gov/cooglitext/f9880.htm That is consistent with what appears on the OCME web page which indicates that only next of kin can request an autopsy. From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 1:03 PM To USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: MCC =I- Per our discussion, some bullets below: We have just gotten a copy from OCME of their full autopsy report, which includes not only their medical findings, but attaches all of the documents/materials they relied upon in reaching their conclusion. By way of background, and to assist the OCME it completing its autopsy, we provided them certain materials that OCMCE had requested from our investigation, including a draft FBI 302 of our interview of a key MCC witness, Lt. I= who was on duty at the time the body was found. We understand that OCME has gotten a request for the autopsy from Epstein's next of kin, his brother Mark Epstein, and it is OCME's standard practice to release the report to next of kin where the cause of death is suicide (by contrast, OCME typically does not release the autopsy where the cause of death is homicide out of respect for the ongoing criminal investigation). Because we provided OCME with certain material now included in its report — and because we obviously are conducting an ongoing criminal investigation — we have asked OCME to make certain redactions before producing its report to Epstein's brother. In particular, we have asked them to redact/withhold the FBI 302 and other documents we obtained from the MCC, and to redact any references to those documents and materials in whatever they do produce. OCME has indicated its willingness to comply with this request and has asked us to propose redactions, which we have now done. A copy of the full repot, with our proposed redactions, is attached. EFTA00103794 We plan to provide our proposed redactions to OCME on Monday September 9. We understand they plan to produce the report as redacted to Epstein's brother at some point next week. The material we are asking OCME to redact is quite sensitive — it includes, for example, the names of the prison guards who we are investigating (names that have not previously been made public), key details and statements made by our potential targets and others at the time the body was found, a draft FBI 302 of a potential key witness, and sensitive MCC documents that would be important to our ability to bring charges. We are also unlikely to make our request for redaction permanent — we would likely be willing to revisit the issue if and when a charging decision has been made. As noted, OCME has indicated to us that it will comply with our request to partially redact its report before providing it to Epstein's next of kin. We separately wanted to flag for you that in an unredacted portion of the report, OCME makes reference to a "handwritten note" that was found in Epstein's cell at the time of his death, although the report also makes clear it was not a suicide note. We have a photograph of the note but it is difficult to read. It appears to be a list of grievances about the conditions at MCC — including about the food, the showers and the presence of bugs -- but we agree with the OCME assessment that it does not appear to be a suicide note We are in the process of obtaining a copy of the note itself and expect to have that on Monday. EFTA00103795

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01655495

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS

From: Cc: Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:15:07 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-14.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 EFTA00094360 Contents Public Corruption Epstein General Crimes Sprecher Violent and Organized Crime Walter Civil Division NYCHA Securities and Commodities Fraud Margulies Sharma and Farkas Matters of Interest Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jiLD, to be selected Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras.

28p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01655948

16p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031699

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00033663

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Contents Public Corruption 2 Epstein 2 General Crimes 14 Sprecher 14 Violent and Organized Crime 20 Walter 20 Civil Division 22 NYCHA 22 Securities and Commodities Fraud 24 Margulies 24 Sharma and Farkas 26 Matters of Interest 28 Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jury to be selected 28 Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act 30 Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel 34 Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 36 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors 38 1 EFTA00094388 SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras. They w

38p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.