Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00128666DOJ Data Set 9Other

FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00128666
Pages
8
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

ti • • FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95) - 1 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of transenpton 0 5/ 0 8/2002 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, date of birth , social security account number occupation financial consultant, business address The Villard House, 457 Madison Ave, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022, telephone number was interviewed at his office. Also present at the interview was EPSTEIN'S attorney JEFFREY SCHANTZ. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, EPSTEIN provided the following information: EPSTEIN owns homes in Aspen, CO, Palm Beach, FL and the Virgin Islands. EPSTEIN stated that LAURENCE S. ZIMMERMAN also owns homes in Aspen and Palm Beach. EPSTEIN was introduced to ZIMMERMAN and they occasionally met or saw each other at social events. In approximately October 2001, ZIMMERMAN asked EPSTEIN for a ride on EPSTEIN'S private plane from New York to Palm Beach. EPSTEIN stated that ZIMMERMAN told him that he was involve

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ti FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95) - 1 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of transenpton 0 5/ 0 8/2002 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, date of birth , social security account number occupation financial consultant, business address The Villard House, 457 Madison Ave, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022, telephone number was interviewed at his office. Also present at the interview was EPSTEIN'S attorney JEFFREY SCHANTZ. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, EPSTEIN provided the following information: EPSTEIN owns homes in Aspen, CO, Palm Beach, FL and the Virgin Islands. EPSTEIN stated that LAURENCE S. ZIMMERMAN also owns homes in Aspen and Palm Beach. EPSTEIN was introduced to ZIMMERMAN and they occasionally met or saw each other at social events. In approximately October 2001, ZIMMERMAN asked EPSTEIN for a ride on EPSTEIN'S private plane from New York to Palm Beach. EPSTEIN stated that ZIMMERMAN told him that he was involved in various financial deals, including deals in the telecommunications industry. ZIMMERMAN asked EPSTEIN if he could contact him with any financial deals that he felt EPSTEIN might have an interest. EPSTEIN told ZIMMERMAN that he could contact him as he is always looking for opportunities to make money and EPSTEIN was aware that many people in the Aspen area had made significant money investing in the telecommunications industry. In December 2001, EPSTEIN was contacted by ZIMMERMAN about an investment that he was making in WINSTAR COMMUNICATIONS INC. (WINSTAR). ZIMMERMAN told EPSTEIN that WINSTAR was a publicly traded company that was presently in bankruptcy proceedings. ZIMMERMAN was putting together a deal through his company, WINTEL TELECOM HOLDINGS INC. (WINTEL) to acquire WINSTAR for approximately $100 million. ZIMMERMAN stated that the assets of WINSTAR were: worth $1 billion. ZIMMERMAN was seeking a $15 million bridge.: loan_filom_EES.TEIN-as -a-down- payment-on--the ---purChase of WINSTAR from the bankruptcy court until he was able to secure a $100 million loan from a bank. ZIMMERMAN offered to put up $15 million of U.S. Treasury Bonds as collateral for the loan. In addition, ZIMMERMAN offered his personal guarantee liwestigmknon 05/08/2002 at New York, New' nm# 196A -MM -93577 Cp c.\7 ca,„. n“( r/ O!7- This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It Is the prope e FBI and As loaned tc?yourigic 1 it and Its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. EFTA00128666 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 196A-MM-93577 Continuation of FD-302 of JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN .0n 05/08/2002 ,page 2 secured by his homes in Aspen and in New York. In consideration of the $15 million bridge loan, ZIMMERMAN agreed to pay EPSTEIN an interest rate of 15% on. the loan and a $500,000 fee. In addition, ZIMMERMAN would give EPSTEIN 3% of the equity (stock) of WINSTAR. EPSTEIN questioned ZIMMERMAN as to why he didn't just borrow against the U.S. Treasury Bonds with a bank since he could borrow nearly dollar for dollar on this collateral. ZIMMERMAN explained to EPSTEIN that his partner had $130 million U.S. Treasury Bonds in an off-shore restricted account. The Bonds could not be repatriated to the U.S. for tax reasons but could be pledged. Due to the time constraints for making the $15 million down payment, going to a bank for the down payment was not an option as he needed the funds as soon as possible. Although EPSTEIN thought the explanation concerning the bonds to be a little unusual he was intrigued about the opportunity to make a significant return on the bridge loan and was interested in ZIMMERMAN'S Aspen home if the deal fell apart. On December 12, 2001, EPSTEIN received a fax from JAMES P. WHITTIER of LANDTEL, 600 Madison Ave, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10022, telephone numbej . The fax included a term sheet which formalized the conversations that EPSTEIN had with ZIMMERMAN concerning the $15 million bridge loan. After reviewing the term sheet, EPSTEIN noticed that there were already current mortgages on the New York and Aspen properties that were to be pledged as collateral. EPSTEIN performed a check of ZIMMERMAN on the Internet and found that there had been two instances of foreclosure on properties owned by ZIMMERMAN in the past. EPSTEIN then contacted ZIMMERMAN and requested supporting documentation regarding all of the loan collateral. EPSTEIN also requested that ZIMMERMAN contact his attorney, JEFFREY SCHANTZ, in all future dealings regarding_the_bridg?_ loan__and.-the- issue -of -- - --- - supporting- documentatfori-fOr the loan collateral. On December 13, 2001, EPSTEIN received a fax from ZIMMERMAN with a LANDTEL coversheet. The fax included a copy of a BLOOMBERG screen printout relating to $15,514,000 of U.S. Treasury Bonds identified with CUSIP #912827W81. EPSTEIN was a EFTA00128667 maxAmmlaersm 196A-MM-93577 Continuation of FD-302 of JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN .0'105/08/2002 Page 3 little annoyed with ZIMMERMAN since this BLOOMBERG screen did not provide any information to him. EPSTEIN contacted ZIMMERMAN and told him that he was not satisfied with the collateral since it did not provide him any information regarding the Bonds. EPSTEIN stated that ZIMMERMAN also provided an appraisal on the New York property that he was putting up as collateral. On December 17, 2001, EPSTEIN received a fax from ZIMMERMAN. The fax included an Institutional Custodial Safekeeping Receipt, an Institutional Receipt and a Special Addendum Institutional Custodial Safekeeping Receipt all making reference to $20 million of U.S. Treasury Bonds. All three documents received by EPSTEIN were on WILLIAMS MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL GROUP, LTD. (WMACGL) stationery. The address for WMACGL was listed as 5721 178th Place, SW, Suite 105, Lynnwood, Washington 98037, telephone number . The Beneficiary listed on the documents was CENTURY CAPITAL, S.A. and the Assignee was listed as WINTEL TELECOM HOLDINGS, INC. All three documents included a Bank Officer Verification and Bank Stamp signed and stamped by KEVIN KEON, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Lynnwood, WA. Later on December 17, 2001, EPSTEIN received two more faxes from ZIMMERMAN. One fax included WINTEL'S bank wire instructions for the bridge loan. The second fax was a "form" commitment letter to the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware regarding EPSTEIN'S intent to immediately fund $15 million to WINTEL which EPSTEIN was instructed to fill out, sign and return to ZIMMERMAN. EPSTEIN telephonically contacted WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, located in Lynnwood, WA and requested to speak with KEVIN KEON. EPSTEIN was advised that there was no one by that name at that branch. EPSTEIN was further advised that a KEVIN KEO used to work at the branch but had moved to the Monroe_branch_of_WELLS______ FARG07 EPSTEIN- contacted KEO and was advised that it was not his signature on the Safekeeping Receipts. ME° advised that the safekeeping receipts with the name KEVIN KEON were not received or reviewed by WELLS FARGO. KEO advised EPSTEIN that WMACGL was currently under investigation by WELLS FARGO regarding other questionable conduct. EFTA00128668 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 196A-MM-93577 ContinuaUon of FD-302 of JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN .On 05/08/2002 Page After finding out this information EPSTEIN was angry and contacted ZIMMERMAN. EPSTEIN confronted ZIMMERMAN with the forged Safekeeping Receipts and informed him that the deal was off. EPSTEIN also wrote a letter to the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware detailing the chain of events concerning the $15 million bridge loan. EPSTEIN stated that he never had a conversation with ZIMMERMAN'S associates, JAY PHILLIP PARKER or JAMES P. WHITTIER. Various faxes that were received by EPSTEIN from LANDTEL had WHITTIER'S or PARKER'S name on them. EPSTEIN never spoke with MARK WILLIAMS or anyone at WMACGL. All of EPSTEIN'S dealings regarding the bridge loan were with ZIMMERMAN. Approximately two weeks ago EPSTEIN'S secretary received a call from a JOHN MACARI. MACARI was very aggressive and pushy on the phone and demanded that he speak with EPSTEIN. The secretary was very upset with MACARI'S conduct on the phone but would not connect him with EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN has not returned the call to MACARI.and does not intend to ever return the call. EFTA00128669 FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95) - 1 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of transcription 05 08 / 2 002 JEFFREY E. STEIN, date o social security account number 0907.1t;3, 4_.oc,c_ .1A. ,a . "anTria.acess The illard House, 452, MadisorcAge, tth-stuut, 14ew—York, NY-70'02Z- eiephone numbgr..421.2*7.54,a89.5,t rag-rifferviewed,4t his office, _Also present at the interview was EPTIflfrgThatf6iriey JEFFREY SCHANTZ. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, EPSTEIN provided the following information: EPSTEIN owns homes in Aspen, CO, Palm Beach, FL and the Virgin Islands. EPSTEIN stated that LAURENCE S. ZIMMERMAN also owns homes in Aspen and Palm Beach. EPSTEIN was introduced to ZIMMERMAN and they occasionally met or saw each other at social events. In approximately October 2001, ZIMMERMAN asked EPSTEIN for a ride on EPSTEIN'S private plane from New York to Palm Beach. EPSTEIN stated that ZIMMERMAN told him that he was involved in various financial deals, including deals in the telecommunications industry. ZIMMERMAN asked EPSTEIN if he could contact him with any financial deals that he felt EPSTEIN might have an interest. EPSTEIN told ZIMMERMAN that he could contact him as he is always looking for opportunities to make money and EPSTEIN was aware that many people in the Aspen area had made significant money investing in the telecommunications industry. In December 2001, EPSTEIN was con acteEl by ZIMMERMAN about a' investment that he was making in NSTAR COMMUNICATIONS INC. T ZIMMERMAN told EPSTEIN t at WINSTAR was a publ ly traded company that was present in bankruptcy proceedings. ZIMMERMAN was putting toge her a deal through his company, WINTEL TELECOM HOLDINGS INC. (WINTEL) to acquire WINSTAR for approximately $100 million. ZIMMERMAN stated that the assets of WINSTAR were worth $1 billion. ZIMMERMAN was seeking a $15 million bridge_loan_from_EPSTEIN__as-a-down-payment-on-the---------------- purchase of WINSTAR from the bankruptcy court until he was able to secure a $100 million loan from a bank. ZIMMERMAN offered to put up $15 million of U.S. Treasury Bonds as collateral for the loan. In addition, ZIMMERMAN offered his personal guarantee InvesUgation on 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 02 at New York, New York Datedictated 05/08/2002 01-55? ) - 1 (-(2_ This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. EFTA00128670 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 196A-MM-93577 Continuation of FD-302 of JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ,on 05/08/2002 ,Page 2 secured by his homes in Aspen and in New York. In consideration of the $15 million bridge loan, ZIMMERMAN agreed to pay EPSTEIN an interest rate of 15% on the loan and a $500,000 fee. In addition, ZIMMERMAN would give EPSTEIN 3% of the equity (stock) of WINSTAR. EPSTEIN questioned ZIMMERMAN as to why he didn't just borrow against the U.S. Treasury Bonds with a bank since he could borrow nearly dollar for dollar on this collateral. ZIMMERMAN explained to EPSTEIN that his partner had $130 million U.S. Treasury Bonds in an off-shore restricted account. The Bonds could not be repatriated to the U.S. for tax reasons but could be pledged. Due to the time constraints for making the $15 million down payment, going to a bank for the down payment was not an option as he needed the funds as soon as possible. Although EPSTEIN thought the explanation concerning the bonds to be a little unus he was int• gued about the opportunity to make a significa return on e bridge loan and was interested in ZIMME S Aspen ho if the deal fell apart. On Dece er 12, 2001, EPSTEIN received a fax from JAMES P. ITTIER of allEg DTEL, , 25th Floor,. New Yo ;77-72 10 2, teltpho ri r "TiTe'ThSciiiefUVererr'%%.4, Id eet Which f rmalized-I e conversations that EPSTEIN had with ZIMMERMAN co cerning the $15 million bridge loan. After reviewing the term sheet, EPSTEIN noticed that there were already current mortgages on the New York and Aspen properties that were to be pledged as collateral. EPSTEIN performed a check of ZIMMERMAN on the Internet and found that there had been two instances of foreclosure on properties owned by ZIMMERMAN in the past. EPSTEIN then contacted ZIMMERMAN and requested supporting documentation regarding all of the loan collateral. EPSTEIN also requested that ZIMMERMAN contact his attorney, JEFFREY SCHANTZ, _ _in_alt_future_dealings_regarding_tha_bridge_loan_and_the_issue_of_______ supporting documentation for the loan collateral. On December 13, 2001, EPSTEIN received a fax from ZIMMERMAN with a LANDTEL coversheet. The fax included a copy of a BLOOMBERG screen printout relating to $15,514,000 of U.S. Treasury Bonds identified with CUSIP #912827W81. EPSTEIN was a EFTA00128671 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 196A-MM-93577 Continuatton of FD-302 of JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ,on 05/08/2002 .page 3 little annoyed with ZIMMERMAN since this BLOOMBERG screen did not provide any information to him. EPSTEIN contacted ZIMMERMAN and told him that he was not satisfied with the collateral since it did not provide him any information regarding the Bonds. EPSTEIN stated that ZIMMERMAN also provided an appraisal on the New York property that he was putting up as collateral. On December 17, 2001, EPSTEIN receive ZIMMERMAN. The fax included an Institutional Safekeeping Receipt, an Institutional Recei Addendum Institutional Custodial Safekeep' reference to $20 million documents received by CAPITAL GROUP, LTD. Vamg—Trt-ecra—gl Walgit4W0A0.31tel?pticTie ' number Ereliciary listed on the do8aMente wa the Assignee was listed as WINTEL TE three documents included a Bank Off' Stamp signed and stamped by KEVIN Lynnwoodtar c f U.S. Treasu STEIN were on CGL) station 8th Place, SW, COM cer V EON, a fax from ustodial and a Special g Receipt all making Bonds. All three ILLIAM MAUGEMENT AND fore-(WVACQJ uite 105, Lynnwood, "The CENTURY CAPITAL, S.A. OLDINGS, INC. All rification and Bank LLS FARGO BANK, NA, and Later on December 17, 2001, EPSTEIN received two more faxes from ZIMMERMAN. One fax included WINTEL'S bank wire instructions for the bridge loan. The second fax was a "form" commitment letter to the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware regarding EPSTEIN'S intent to immediately fund $15 million to WINTEL which EPSTEIN was instructed to fill out, sign and return to ZIMMERMAN. EPSTEIN telephonically contacted WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, located in Lynnwood, WA and requested to speak with KEVIN KEON. EPSTEIN was advised that there was no one by that name at that branch. EPSTEIN was further advised that a KEVIN KEO used to _ work at the branch but had moved to the Monroe branch of WELLS FARGO. EPSTEIN contacted KEO and was advised that it was not his signature on the Safekeeping Receipts. KEO advised that the safekeeping receipts with the name KEVIN KEON were not received or reviewed by WELLS FARGO. KEO advised EPSTEIN that WMACGL was currently under investigation by WELLS FARGO regarding other questionable conduct. EFTA00128672 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 196A-MM-93577 Continuation of FD-30201 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN On 05/08/2002 ,page After finding out this information EPSTEIN was angry and contacted ZIMMERMAN. EPSTEIN confronted ZIMMERMAN with the forged Safekeeping Receipts and informed him that the deal was off. EPSTEIN also wrote a letter to the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware detailing the chain of events concerning the $15 million bridge loan. EPSTEIN stated that he never had a conversation with ZIMMERMAN'S associates, JAY PHILLIP PARKER or JAMES P. WHITTIER. Various faxes that were received by EPSTEIN from LANDTEL had WHITTIER'S or PARKER'S name on them. EPSTEIN never spoke with MARK WILLIAMS or anyone at WMACGL. All of EPSTEIN'S dealings regarding the bridge loan were with ZIMMERMAN. Approximately two weeks ago EPSTEIN'S secretary received a call from a JOHN MACARI. MACARI was very aggressive and pushy on the phone and demanded that he speak with EPSTEIN. The secretary was very upset with MACARI'S conduct on the phone but would not connect him with EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN has not returned the call to MACARI and does not intend to ever return the call. EFTA00128673

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Good afternoon all,

Good afternoon all, Below please find complaints from Epstein's attorneys. Can you check to see if he has toilet paper and that his CPAP is plugged in? I am less concerned regarding his complaint of having had two calls, but they were on unmonitored lines, so there is no recording of them. Is his phone account set up so he can get a call on the ITS when 30 days has elapsed? iiih Thank you, Supervisory Staff Attorney CLC New York M r li n orrectional Center New York. New York 10007 >» Good afternoon Mr. Our client, Jeffrey Epstein, has informed us that he has no toilet paper in his cell. he was unable to use it. > 8/6/2019 3:20 PM >>> Also, since his arrival at MCC, he has only been able to make two fifteen minute phone, with officers present. Thank you in advance for your help. Best, New York NY 10016 His CPap machine was not phone calls. Both times, the plugged in last night, so calls were on speaker NOTICE: This message may contain information that is privileg

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) -1 of 2- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OrmumBzoono ...,... ..... Date of entry 72/31/2019 , date of birth , was interviewed at 505 S Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida. Present for the interview was FBI Victim Specialist , Detective and Special Agent . After being advised of the identities of the above listed individuals and the nature of the interview, provided the following information: grew up i . She is currently married and works at an anthropology store. She attended Middle school and High school. She then attended College. was attending High School at the time of the incident. The incident was around 2004 when she was 15 years old. believed it was during the summer because she had more of an open schedule. Her parents had divorced and her mother purchased a business. Because of this, her mother was very busy, and started becoming very rebellious and started using drugs. Her friend , whose last name did not wish to shar

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.