U.S. Department of Justice
Summary
• U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation In Reply, Please Refer to Pile No. Seth Lehrman, Esquire Rothstein Rosenfeldt, Adler Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe v. Jeffre Case No: 08-8089 Dear Mr. Lehrman: stein IN/ 16320 N.W. 2nd Avenue North Miami Beach, Florida 33169 October 20, 2009 We are in receipt of your subpoena in the above referenced civil action, received by this office on October 16, 2009. Please be advised that the FBI response to this subpoena is governed by the provisions of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 16.21 et seq. and the Privacy Act (Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a). These regulations specify that no employee of the Department of Justice, past or present, shall in response to a demand, produce or disclose information unless there is compliance with the applicable provisions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Su
Persons Referenced (4)
“...f the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...: Jane Doe ) Pfainre ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-80893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSO Jeffrey Epstein ) ) (If the action is pending in another district, state where: Ph Defenda...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
EXHIBIT Q
EXHIBIT Q EFTA00097394 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X INNIErt INIMINME, Plaintiff, v. GHISLATNE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. EFTA00097395 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 11 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit, and states as follows: INTRODUCTION Despite having taken only three depositions to date, Plaintiff prematurely requests permission to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(aX2)(A)(i) and to conduct 17 separate depositions, almost twice the limit. Without legal support, Plaintiff attempts to conflate the presumptive time limita
MARKUS / MOSS
MARKUS / MOSS July 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring to the Court's attention" an article that I wrote on June 30, 2021, and asked that the Court "issue an order pursuant to Local Rule 23.1(h)" directed at me. (Dkt. No. 309). This Court ordered that I respond (Dkt. No. 312), and I do so here. I respectfully request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of
5/19)22, 3:52 PM
5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward.[196] • A similar $so-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.(L.291 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed. [1.19-] All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.i1X-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.P:t193 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014 su Flts0SE Si KC; stim 1 N)Eccri ncs FT' (<) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights ./W-by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with E stein and his limited 2008
Confidential
Confidential Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS **CONFIDENTIAL** x Continued Videotaped Deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the Defendant herein, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 (866) 624-6221 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00083933 Confidential Page 2 1 2 APPEARANCES: 3 On Behalf of the Plaintiff: 4 BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 333 Main Street 5 Armonk, New York 10504 BY: DAVID BOIES, ESQUIRE 6 7 8 BY: BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER,LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 MEREDITH SCHULTZ, ESQUIRE SIGRID McCAWLEY, ESQUIRE 9 SANDRA PER
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.