Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00128674DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00128674
Pages
6
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

• U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation In Reply, Please Refer to Pile No. Seth Lehrman, Esquire Rothstein Rosenfeldt, Adler Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe v. Jeffre Case No: 08-8089 Dear Mr. Lehrman: stein IN/ 16320 N.W. 2nd Avenue North Miami Beach, Florida 33169 October 20, 2009 We are in receipt of your subpoena in the above referenced civil action, received by this office on October 16, 2009. Please be advised that the FBI response to this subpoena is governed by the provisions of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 16.21 et seq. and the Privacy Act (Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a). These regulations specify that no employee of the Department of Justice, past or present, shall in response to a demand, produce or disclose information unless there is compliance with the applicable provisions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Su

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation In Reply, Please Refer to Pile No. Seth Lehrman, Esquire Rothstein Rosenfeldt, Adler Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe v. Jeffre Case No: 08-8089 Dear Mr. Lehrman: stein IN/ 16320 N.W. 2nd Avenue North Miami Beach, Florida 33169 October 20, 2009 We are in receipt of your subpoena in the above referenced civil action, received by this office on October 16, 2009. Please be advised that the FBI response to this subpoena is governed by the provisions of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 16.21 et seq. and the Privacy Act (Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a). These regulations specify that no employee of the Department of Justice, past or present, shall in response to a demand, produce or disclose information unless there is compliance with the applicable provisions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Court. See U.S. ex rel, Touhv v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). To obtain FBI investigative information, the party making the request must provide to this office an affidavit, or statement which describes the nature of the litigation. To comply with the CFR, the statement should explain the specific information requested and its relevance to the proceedings. If testimony is being sought, then scope of that testimony should be explained. In accordance with these regulations, before any information from FBI files may be released, we must receive and have the opportunity to review you CFR statement. In addition, the Privacy Act (Title 5, U.S.C., Section 522a(b), prohibits the release of agency records pertaining to an individual, or information from those records, for a non-law enforcement purpose. The FBI may not disclose this information without the notarized written consent of each record subject, or an Order from a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing its disclosure by the FBI. In the absence of compliance with the CFR, and either the notarized consent of each record subject or an appropriate court order authorizing disclosure, we are statutorily prohibited from testimony or releasing any records to you. Please take this into consideration, as your deposition may have to be postponed. N0 Ca (Cal \APLIckmva Enclosure Di vto veo.40- 62F-MM-A96023-B tjmooRed agsbinoi. Le+ EFTA00128674 A sample Privacy Act Order is enclosed to assist you in the draft. If your motion is granted, provide the Order along with your CFR compliance to this office. If you are providing the notarized consent forms in lieu of the court order, enclose them along with your CFR compliance. You ma direct your correspondence to the attention of Paralegal Specialist , at the above address. In accordance with the above cited law and regu ations, we must receive your CFR compliance and the notarized consent or court order before any documents may be released to you. If ou have an questions or require further assistance, please contact Very Truly Yours, By: Chief Division Counsel 2* EFTA00128675 11/13/09 View Case ICVCM002 10:50:44 Page 1 of 3 view case, then press Enter Case ID • 31E-MM-108062 Class • 031 E WSTA-CHILD PROSTITUTION Status ' P PENDING Squad ' PB2 PB2 Source ' 11 OTHER Case Type Opened • 07/25/2006 Identity Theft . . : N EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Title Summary eacIP_Aoy—t: 1 Command > F1=Help,F3=Exit,F4=Prompt,F6=multv,F7=Bkwd,F8=Fwd,P11=NextPg,F12.cancel F13=ListSerial 4A0 03,074 EFTA00128676 AO SSA (Rev. 01109) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Florida To: Records Custodian Fedeal Bureau Invests ato C/O rth Miami Beach, FL 33169 O Testimony: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action. If you are an organization that is not a party in this case, you must designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment: Jane Doe ) Pfainre ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-80893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSO Jeffrey Epstein ) ) (If the action is pending in another district, state where: Ph Defendant ) ea —liri SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION ‘0 \4°CC Ciat - OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACTION \-1 V.., Place:11W Reporters, Miami, FL 331 Date and Time: 11/09120091:00 em The deposition will be recorded by this method: Recorded ref Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material: Provide any and all evidence involving the Jeffrey Epstein investigation obtained by the FBI or taken from the Palm Beach Police Department and the Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office to include all videos, compact discs, DVD's, photographs, documentary evidence and any other evidence that the FBI seized from the Palm Beach P.D.or in any way relating to any investigation of Jeffrey Epstein The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject t 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential co attached. Date: OCIAM i -C 74b1 CLERK OF COURT OR Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney's signature bpoena, and Rule doing so, are The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) Jane Doe Sia41A.) 014 (inth , who issues or requests this subpoena, are: Brad Edwards, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Suite 1650, 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 954 522 3456. [email protected]. EFTA00128677 AO SSA (Rev. 01/09) Subpoena toTestify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action (Page 2) Civil Action No. 08-80893CIV-MARRAMONNSO PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45) This subpoena for (name of individual and title, ifany) was received by me on (date) O I personally served the subpoena on the individual at (place) on (dale) ; or O I left the subpoena at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or O I served the subpoena on (name of designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) O I returned the subpoena unexecuted because O Other (spec((,): , who is on (date) ; or Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of My fees arc $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of 0.00 Date: I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. ; or Server's signature Printed name and title Server's address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: EFTA00128678 AO 8SA (Rev. 01/09) Subpoena toTestily at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action (Page 3) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07) (e) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction —which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply. (2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required A person commanded to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply: p) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection. (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer from significant expense resulting from compliance. (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (i) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3XBXiii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held; (lip requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: () disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information; (if) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or (iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial. (C) Specking Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party: (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information: (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery. (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection (A) Information Withheld A person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial•preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial- preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(AXii). EFTA00128679

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT Q

EXHIBIT Q EFTA00097394 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X INNIErt INIMINME, Plaintiff, v. GHISLATNE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. EFTA00097395 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 11 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit, and states as follows: INTRODUCTION Despite having taken only three depositions to date, Plaintiff prematurely requests permission to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(aX2)(A)(i) and to conduct 17 separate depositions, almost twice the limit. Without legal support, Plaintiff attempts to conflate the presumptive time limita

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARKUS / MOSS

MARKUS / MOSS July 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring to the Court's attention" an article that I wrote on June 30, 2021, and asked that the Court "issue an order pursuant to Local Rule 23.1(h)" directed at me. (Dkt. No. 309). This Court ordered that I respond (Dkt. No. 312), and I do so here. I respectfully request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5/19)22, 3:52 PM

5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward.[196] • A similar $so-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.(L.291 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed. [1.19-] All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.i1X-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.P:t193 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014 su Flts0SE Si KC; stim 1 N)Eccri ncs FT' (<) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights ./W-by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with E stein and his limited 2008

68p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Confidential

Confidential Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS **CONFIDENTIAL** x Continued Videotaped Deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the Defendant herein, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 (866) 624-6221 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00083933 Confidential Page 2 1 2 APPEARANCES: 3 On Behalf of the Plaintiff: 4 BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 333 Main Street 5 Armonk, New York 10504 BY: DAVID BOIES, ESQUIRE 6 7 8 BY: BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER,LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 MEREDITH SCHULTZ, ESQUIRE SIGRID McCAWLEY, ESQUIRE 9 SANDRA PER

21p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.