CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 1 of 21
LRJ, MEDREQ, REF_DISCOV
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM
Doe v. Epstein
Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson
Member case: (View Member Case)
Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM
Cause: 28:1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff
Jane Doe
No. 2
Date Filed: 02/06/2008
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Jurisdiction: Diversity
•
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
Mermelstein & Horowitz PA
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami FL 33160
Fax:
Email:
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
Herman & Mermelstein
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami FL 33160
NM=
Fax
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
Mermelstein & Horowitz PA
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
Miami FL 33160
LEAD ATTORNEY
https://ecIfIsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175589
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 2 of 21
V.
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 102
Como] Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 101
Consolrlabitiff
Jane Doe 11
represented by Katherine Warthen Ezell
Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al
City National Bank Building
25 W Flagler Street
Suite 800
Miami , FL 33130-1780
ax:
Emai
LEAD
Robed I Josefsberg
Podhurs
rseck Josefsberg et al
City National Bank Building
25 W Flagler Street
Suite 800
Miami , FL 33130-1780
'ax:
Email
LEAD
represented by Katherine Warthen Ezell
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Robert
Josefsberg
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Isidro Manuel Garcia
Garcia Elkins & Boehringer
224 Datura Avenue
Suite 900
West Palm Beach , FL 33401
ax:
Email:
https://eculsd.uscourts.govicgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175590
Chi/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 3 of 21
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 6
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 7
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Bradley James Edwards
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
401 East Las Olas Blvd
Suite 1650
Ft. Lauderdale , FL 33301
Fax:
Email:
LEAD ATTORNEY
Paul lassell
Email:
LEAD ATTORNEY
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175591
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 4 of 21
PRO HAC VICE
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Consol Plaintiff
represented by Jack Patrick Hill
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &
Shipley
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
PO Drawer 3626
, FL 33402-3626
Fax: 22/11....
Email:
LEAD ATTORNEY
Richard Horace Willits
Richard H Willits PA
2290 10th Avenue North
Suite 404
•L 33461
Fax:
Email:
LEAD ATTORNEY
Consealtintiff
Jane Doe No. 5
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 4
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175592
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 5 of 21
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Consol Plaintiff
Jane Doe No. 3
V.
Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein
represented by Adam D. Horowitz
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Jeffrey Marc Herman
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Stuart S. Mermelstein
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
represented by Jack Alan Goldberger
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
, FL 33401-5012
Fax: 8
Email:
Martin G. Weinberg
20 Park Plaza
2116
Fax: 338-9538
PRO HAC VICE
https://ecfflsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/D1ctRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175593
•
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 6 of 21
Michael James Pike
Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman
515 N Flagler Drive
Suite 400
West Palm each , FL 33401-2918
Fax: 515-3148
Email:
Michael Ross Tein
Lewis Tein
3059 Grand Avenue
Suite 340
Coconut
e , FL 33133
Fax: 442-6744
Email:
TERMINATED: 05/20/2009
Robert Deweese Critton , Jr.
Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman
515 N Flagler Drive
Suite 400
West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918
Auricus
United States of America
represented by
Fax:
Email:
e
a es
ome
Office
500 East Broward Blvd
7th Floor
uder
, FL 33394
, ext. 3546
Fax: 3511S
inimi
Email:
.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
Date Filed
#
Docket Text
02/06/2008
1
COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein; Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 542215,
filed by Jane Doe No.2.(1k) (Entered: 02/06/2008)
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175594
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 7 of 21
02/06/2008
2 Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Epstein. (Ik) (Entered: 02/06/2008)
02/08/2008
a Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and Joint Scheduling Report.Signed by
Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 2/8/08.(ir) (Entered: 02/08/2008)
05/22/2008
4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey
Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered:
05/22/2008)
05/22/2008
5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on
5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (Ik) (Entered: 05/27/2008)
05/27/2008
6 NOTICE of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer: re 4 Affidavit of
Service filed by Jane Doe. Error: Wrong Event Selected;
Correction=Redocketed as "Summons returned executed", D.E. 5 . Instruction
to Filerin the future please select "summons returned executed" as the proper
Event. (Ik) (Entered: 05/27/2008)
05/29/2008
7 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane
Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A and B, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Default
Ord)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
06/06/2008
8 CLERK'S NOTICE Denying for Improper Service 2 Plaintiffs MOTION for
Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant (tp) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
06/11/2008
9 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant, or
Alternatively, for an Enlgargement of Time to Serve Process, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jane Doe. Responses due by 6/30/2008
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered:
06/11/2008)
06/13/2008
IQ NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Alan Goldberger on behalf of
Jeffrey Epstein (Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008)
06/13/2008
11 RESPONSE to Motion re 9 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter
Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargement of Time to
Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey
Epstein. Replies due by 6/23/2008. (Attachments: # I Affidavit for Richard
Bamett)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008)
06/20/2008
12 Defendant's MOTION to Stay by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 7/10/2008
(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
06/20/2008
la Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise
Respond To Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. (Goldberger, Jack) (Entered:
06/20/2008)
06/24/2008
J4 MEMORANDUM in Support re 9 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to
Enter Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargement of
Time to Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jane
Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/24/2008)
06/30/2008
15 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Of Filing Deposition (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)
(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/30/2008)
https://ecIfIsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pft482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175595
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 8 of 21
07/01/2008
14 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Concerning Motion To Stay [DE 12]
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 07/01/2008)
07/08/2008
17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Ross Tein on behalf of Jeffrey
Epstein (Tein, Michael) (Entered: 07/08/2008)
07/10/2008
111 Plaintiffs MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 12
Defendant's MOTION to Stay by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of
Proposed Order)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 07/10/2008)
07/10/2008
19 Sealed Document. (yc) UNSEALED see DE 23 . Modified on 7/17/2008 (bs).
(Entered: 07/10/2008)
07/10/2008
20 Sealed Document. (yc) UNSEALED see DE 24 . Modified on 7/17/2008 (bs).
(Entered: 07/10/2008)
07/10/2008
21 UNSEALED MOTION to Seal by Jeffrey Epstein. (previously filed as 19
sealed document) (bs) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
07/10/2008
24 UNSEALED Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action by
Jeffrey Epstein (previously filed as 20 sealed document) (bs) (Entered:
07/17/2008)
07/16/2008
21 ORDER denying motion to file Ex Parte and Under Seal. The clerk shall
unseal DE 19 and 20 and make them available for inspection through
CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
7/16/08. (ir) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2008: # 1 docket sheet)
(bs). (Entered: 07/16/2008)
07/16/2008
22 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against
Defendant. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Judge
Kenneth A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008)
07/18/2008
21 RESPONSE to Motion rela Defendant's MOTION to Stay and Memorandum
of Law filed by Jane Doe. Replies due by 7/28/2008. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A)(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/18/2008)
07/21/2008
26 AFFIDAVIT signed by : Jeffrey M. Herman. re 22 Order to Show Cause and
Service of Process by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/21/2008)
07/25/2008
2Z MOTION for Hearing Defendant's Request for Oral Argument by Jeffrey
Epstein. (Tein, Michael) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
07/25/2008
28 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
7/25/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
07/28/2008
29 UNSEALED Sealed Document. (tas) -Modified on 8/12/2008 "For Image
please see DE # 31 **(gp). (Entered: 07/28/2008)
07/28/2008
30 UNSEALED Sealed Document. (tas) -Modified on 8/12/2008 **For Image
please see DE # a ** (gp). (Entered: 07/28/2008)
07/28/2008
31 MOTION to File Under Seal Reply to Plaintiffs' responses to his motions for
stay, under seal by Jeffrey Epstein. {Originally DE # 29 } (gp) Modified on
8/12/2008 (gp). (Entered: 08/12/2008)
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DIctRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175596
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 9 of 21
07/28/2008
a REPLY to Response to Motion re 12 Defendant's MOTION to Stay filed by
Jeffrey Epstein. (Originally DE # 30 } (gp) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
07/29/2008
31 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Tein, Michael) (Entered:
07/29/2008)
07/30/2008
32 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Waiver of Service (Tein, Michael) (Entered:
07/30/2008)
08/05/2008
33. ORDER denying 12 Motion to Stay; granting nunc pro tune 1$ Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond ; denying as moot 27 Motion for Hearing.
Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/4/08. (ir) (Entered: 08/05/2008)
08/05/2008
34 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL. The Clerk shall unseal DE 30
Sealed Document, 29 Sealed Document and make them available for public
inspection through CM/ECF. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/4/08.
(ir) (Entered: 08/05/2008)
08/06/2008
35 Joint MOTION to Approve Stipulation for Acceptance of Service of Process
and Agreed Date for Defendant's Response to Complaints by Jane Doe.
(Attachments: # 1 Stipulation, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Order Approving
Stipulation)(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/06/2008)
08/07/2008
36 ENDORSED ORDER granting 35 Motion to approve stipulation for
acceptance of service of process and agreed date for defendant's responses to
complaints. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/6/08. (ir) (Entered:
08/07/2008)
08/07/2008
Reset Answer Due Deadline: Jeffrey Epstein response due 9/4/2008. (ir)
(Entered: 08/07/2008)
08/27/2008
39 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 08/27/2008)
08/27/2008
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael James Pike, Robert Deweese
Critton, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein See DE 39 for image (tp) (Entered:
08/28/2008)
08/28/2008
Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 39 Notice
(Other) filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Error - Wrong Event Selected; Correction -
Redocketed by Clerk as Notice of Attorney Appearance. Instruction to Filer -
In the future, please select the proper event. It is not necessary to refile this
document (tp) (Entered: 08/28/2008)
09/04/2008
4Q Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses
due by 9/22/2008 (rein, Michael) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
09/22/2008
41 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 4Q Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss t
Complaint filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/22/2008)
09/22/2008
42 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Jane Doe.(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered:
09/22/2008)
09/23/2008
43 ORDER denying as moot 4A) Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 13 Motion
for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRptpl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175597
CM/ECI: - Live Database - flsd
Page 10 of 21
Marra on 9/23/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/23/2008)
09/25/2008
44 SCHEDULING REPORT- Rule 26(f). (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered:
09/25/2008)
09/30/2008
45 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 1/25/2010 09:00 AM in West
Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Calendar Call set for
1/22/2010 10:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A.
Marra., Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2008. Discovery due by 8/3/2009.
Motions due by 8/31/2009. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge
Linnea R. Johnson for Discovery Proceedings, ORDER REFERRING CASE
to Mediation. 15 days to appoint mediator. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra
on 9/29/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
10/06/2008
46 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More
Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton,
Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008)
10/24/2008
4/ Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 46
Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More
Definite Statement by Jane Doe. (Attachments: ti I Text of Proposed Order)
(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
10/27/2008
41 ORDER granting (47 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Unopposed MOTION for
Extension of Time to File Response as to (46) Defendant's MOTION to
Dismiss (42) Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement
( Responses due by 10/31/2008) in case 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM; granting (43)
Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (47 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM)
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to (46)
Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss (42) Amended Complaint and for More
Definite Statement in case 9:08-cv-80232-ICAM; granting (55) Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond re (47 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Unopposed
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to (46) Defendant's
MOTION to Dismiss (42) Amended Complaint and for More Definite
Statement in case 9:08-cv-80380-ICAM; granting (53) Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond re (47 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) Unopposed MOTION for
Extension of Time to File Response as to (46) Defendant's MOTION to
Dismiss (42) Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement in case
9:08-cv-80381-KAM in case 9:08-ev-80119-ICAM. Signed by Judge Kenneth
A. Marra on 10/24/2008. (ir) (Entered: 10/27/2008)
10/28/2008
Reset Deadlines as to Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss (49) Amended
Complaint and for More Definite Statement. Responses due by 10/31/2008.
(ir) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
10/31/2008
49 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 4.6 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42
Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement filed by Jane Doe.
(Attachments: i4 I Exhibit A)(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
11/10/2008
50 RESPONSE/REPLY to 42 Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion
to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 11/10/2008)
11/10/2008
51 REPLY to Response to Motion it 44 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42
https://ectflsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175598
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 11 of 21
Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
See DE 50 for image (tp) (Entered: 11/13/2008)
11/13/2008
52 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 5Q
Response/Reply (Other) filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Error - Wrong Event
Selected; Correction - Redocketed by Clerk as Reply to Response to Motion
to Dismiss". Instruction to Filer - In the future, please select the proper event.
It is not necessary to refile this document. (tp) (Entered: 11/13/2008)
12/30/2008
53 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein of Withdrawal as Co-Counsel (rein, Michael)
(Entered: 12/30/2008)
02/12/2009
54 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to
Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Kenneth
A. Marra on 2/12/2009. (ir) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
02/23/2009
55 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Change of Name of Plaintiff's Counsel (Horowitz,
Adam) (Entered: 02/23/2009)
02/27/2009
5_6 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second), filed by Jane Doe.(Horowitz, Adam)
(Entered: 02127/2009)
03/02/2009
5/ Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of
Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe.
Responses due by 3/19/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # a
Exhibit l)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 03/02/2009)
03/04/2009
58 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 56
Amended Complaint with proposed Order by Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton,
Robert) (Entered: 03/04/2009)
03/05/2009
59 ENDORSED ORDER granting la Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
Complaint. Jeffrey Epstein response due 4/3/2009. Signed by Judge Kenneth
A. Marra on 3/5/2009. (ir) (Entered: 03/05/2009)
03/06/2009
60 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 57
Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of
Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support with proposed
Order by Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 03/06/2009)
03/12/2009
61 ORDER granting O Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re 57
Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of
Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support Responses due
by 3/25/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 3/12/2009.
(kza) (Entered: 03/12/2009)
03/18/2009
62 Defendant's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages with proposed Order by
Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 03/18/2009)
03/25/2009
6,1 RESPONSE to Motion re 57 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to
Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies lie by
4/6/2009. (Attachments: # I Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # a Exhibit M(Critton,
Robert) (Entered: 03/25/2009)
•
https://ectflsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175599
Clvi/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 12 of 21
03/25/2009
64 ORDER Granting 62 Motion to Exceed Page Limitation. Signed by
Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 3/24/2009. (sa) (Entered: 03/25/2009)
03/25/2009
65 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 5¢ Amended Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein.
Respon s due by 4/13/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 2
ExhibitIXPike, Michael) (Entered: 03/25/2009)
03/26/2009
66 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition ofJane
Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Smart) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
04/02/2009
67 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP by Jeffrey Epstein.
Respon
due by 4/20/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # a Exhibit B, # a
Exhibiti)(Critton, Robert) (Entered: 04/02/2009)
04/02/2009
61 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Answers to 1st Interrogs by Jeffrey Epstein.
Respon
due by 4/20/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, 11 a
ExhibitB)(Critton, Robert) (Entered: 04/02/2009)
04/02/2009
62 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint
(Second) by Jeffrey Epstein.(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/02/2009)
04/03/2009
n Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 62 Response
to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of
Documents by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)
(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009)
04/06/2009
71
Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 66
MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane
Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jeffrey Epstein. (Pike,
Michael) (Entered: 04/06/2009)
04/07/2009
72 ENDORSED ORDER granting 71 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re _6.6 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of
Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support. Responses due by 4/13/2009.
Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/7/2009. (ir) (Entered: 04/07/2009)
04/10/2009
73 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 66
MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane
Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support, 72 Order on Motion for
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer, (Amended) by Jeffrey
Epstein. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/10/2009)
04/13/2009
74 ENDORSED ORDER granting (73) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM) MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash
Subpoena for Deposition ofJane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for
Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support in
case 9:08-cv-80 I 1 9-ICAM; granting (65) Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond re (66 in 9:08-ev-80119-ICAM) MOTION for Protective Order and
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175600
CM/E CF - Live Database - flsd
Page 13 of 21
to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate
Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in
Support in case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM; granting (80) Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) MOTION for Protective
Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition ofJane Doe No. 3, Motion to
Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support in case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; granting (31)
Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM)
MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane
Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support in case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM in
case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. Responses due by 4/16/2009. Signed by Judge
Kenneth A. Marra on 4/13/2009. (ir) (Entered: 04/13/2009)
04/13/2009
ZS Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Memorandum
in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action by Jane Doe.
(Attachments: # I Text of Proposed Order)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered:
04/13/2009)
04'14 ?0(l')
76 ENDORSED ORDER granting (75) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56)
Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; granting (67) Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's
MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM;
granting (82) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-
80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay it (56) Amended Complaint in
case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; granting (73) Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56)
Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM; granting (33) Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's
MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM;
granting (27) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-
80119-1CAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended Complaint in
case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. ( Responses due by
4/23/2009). Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/14/2009. (ir) (Entered:
04/14/2009)
04/16/2009
71 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 66
MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane
Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support, 74 Order on Motion for
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer
72 Order on
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer, by Jeffrey
Epstein. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/16/2009)
04/17/2009
78 ENDORSED ORDER granting (77) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash
Subpoena for Deposition ofJane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for
Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support in
case 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM; granting (84) Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) MOTION for Protective Order and
https://ectflsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DIctRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175601
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 14 of 21
to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate
Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in
Support in case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; granting (35) Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) MOTION for Protective
Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition ofJane Doe No. 3, Motion to
Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support in case 9:08-cv-80993-ICAM in case 9:08-cv-
80119-1CAM. ( Responses due by 4/24/2009). Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 4/17/2009. (ir) (Entered: 04/17/2009)
04/17/2009
22 RESPONSE to Motion re 66 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash
Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for
Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support
filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 4/27/2009. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit
A)(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/17/2009)
04/17/2009
$Q Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 62
Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP, 6.8 Defendant's
MOTION to Compel Answers to 1st Interrogs by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # I
Text of Proposed Order)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/17/2009)
04/20/2009
81 MEMORANDUM in Support re 57 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers
to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered:
04/20/2009)
04/23/2009
82 RESPONSE in Opposition re 65 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 5.6
Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered:
04/23/2009)
04/27/2009
8.1 ORDER Granting 7Q Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a
Reply Memoranda as to 61 Response to Motion to Compel Answers to
Interrogatories and Production of Documents. Reply due by 4/20/2009.Signed
by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 4/27/2009. (sa) (Entered:
04/27/2009)
04/27/2009
$4
ORDER Granting $Q Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a
Response in Opposition to 62 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to
First Request to Produce, 6$ Defendant's MOTION to Compel Answers to 1st
Interrogatories. Response due by 4/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge
Linnea R. Johnson on 4/27/2009. (sa) (Entered: 04/27/2009)
04/27/2009
85 MEMORANDUM in Support re 66 MOTION for Protective Order and to
Quash Subpoena for Deposition ofJane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate
Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in
Support by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/27/2009)
04/29/2009
M. ORDER granting 65. Motion for Protective Order and Consolidating Cases for
Purposes of Discovery. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/28/2009.
(cqs) (Entered: 04/29/2009)
04/29/2009
82 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 67
Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP, 68 Defendant's
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175602
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 15 of 21
MOTION to Compel Answers to 1st Interrogs by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1
Text of Proposed Order)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/29/2009)
05/04/2009
8_8 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re $¢ Order on Motion for Protective Order
by Jeffrey Epstein. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/04/2009)
05/05/2009
B1 Motion for Extension of Time to File REPLY to Response to Motion re 65
Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 16 Amended Complaint filed by Jeffrey
Epstein. (Pike, Michael) Modified on 5/6/2009 (ir). (Entered: 05/05/2009)
05/05/2009
90 Defendant's MOTION to Compel !den* Doe in Style of Case and in Third-
Party Subpoenas by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 5/22/2009
(Attachments: # I Exhibit Exhibit A)(Critton, Robert) (Entered: 05/05/2009)
05/05/2009
D. Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-
Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90) by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses
due by 5/22/2009 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 05/05/2009)
05/06/2009
92 ENDORSED ORDER granting (89) Motion for Extension of Time to Reply re
(65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended
Complaint; granting (81) Motion for Extension of Time to Reply re (65 in
9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended
Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM; granting (97) Motion for Extension
of Time to Reply it (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) Defendant's MOTION to
Stay it (56) Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; granting (82)
Motion for Extension of Time to Reply re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM)
Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-
80381-ICAM; granting (46) Motion for Extension of Time to Reply re (65 in
9:08-ev-80119-1CAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended
Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM; granting (37) Motion for Extension
of Time to Reply re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to
Stay re (56) Amended Complaint in case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM in case 9:08-
cv-80119-ICAM. ( Replies due by 5/20/2009.). Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 5/5/2009. (ir) (Entered: 05/06/2009)
05/06/2009
93 RESPONSE in Opposition re 18 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Answers to
1st Interrogs and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses filed by Jane Doe.
(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 05/06/2009)
05/06/2009
94 RESPONSE in Opposition re 62 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response
to 1st RTP , Overrule Objections and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses
filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit AXHorowitz, Adam) (Entered:
05/06/2009)
05/11/2009
95 Defendant's MOTION for Order Requiring that plaintiff use Proper Case Style
in all Filings by Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton, Robert) Modified on 5/12/2009 (Is).
[Text modified by Clerk] (Entered: 05/11/2009)
05/12/2009
96 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 95 Defendant's
MOTION Require Plaintiff to Use Proper Case Style filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
Error - Docket text does not match document; Correction - Docket text
modified by Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (Is) (Entered:
05/12/2009)
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175603
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 16 of 21
05/13/2009
91 RESPONSE/REPLY to 82 Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or
Continue Action by Jeffrey Epstein. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
05/14/2009
% ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. Hereinafter all motions and other court
filings that relate to discovery and all procedural motions that relate to
multiple cases shall be styled with all of the case names and numbers and shall
be filed in Case No. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA. Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 5/14/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM et al. (ir)
(Entered: 05/14/2009)
05/14/2009
22 ORDER REQUESTING UNITED STATES PROVIDE POSITION TO
MOTION TO STAY. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/14/2009.
(Attachments: # 1 Appendix Motion to Stay DE 51) Associated Cases: 9:08-
cv-80119-KAM et al. (ir) (Entered: 05/14/2009)
05/14/2009
-
100 ORDER denying as moot 25 Motion. See Order consolidating cases.. Signed
by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/14/2009. (Ic3) (Entered: 05/14/2009)
05/15/2009
101 Plaintiffs MOTIOEfapxtension of Time to File Response to Defendant's
Motion to IdentifrEM. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of
Discovery, or AlternatIverlyjigtion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated
Memorandum of Law byM... Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM,
9:08-cv-80811-KAM(Hill, Jack) (Entered: 05/15/2009)
05/18/2009
102 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to (39 in 9:08-
cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion, (40 in 9:08-cv-80994-
KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion by Jeffrey Epstein. Associated
Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM et al.(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/18/2009)
05/19/2009
103 ENDORSED ORDER granting 141 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re a Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and
Third-Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90). Responses due by
5/26/2009. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/18/2009. (ir) (Entered:
05/19/2009)
05/19/2009
.1.(14 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Cases from Current Trial Docket by Jeffrey
Epstein. Responses due by 6/8/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Associated
Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM et al.(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/19/2009)
05/19/2009
11/5 MOTION Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Co-Counsel by Jeffrey Epstein.
(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tein, Michael) Modified relief on
5/20/2009 (tp). (Entered: 05/19/2009)
05/20/2009
106 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 105 Motion for
Leave to Withdraw as as Co-counsel filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The Filer
selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the Motion. The
correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document
but future motions filed must include all applicable relief events. (tp) (Entered:
05/20/2009)
05/20/2009
102
ORDER granting10.5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Michael
Ross Tein terminated. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. (ir)
(Entered: 05/20/2009)
https://ectflsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175604
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 17 of 21
05/20/2009
Ma NOTICE be.
of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raise
Lions to
Defendant. Jetey Epstein's Motion to Ag
And/Or IdentifyMf. in the
Style of This Case and Motion to Identi
. in Third-Party Subpoenas
for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte,
With Inorporated Memorandum of Law Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-
KAM et al.(Hill, Jack) (Entered: 05/20/2009)
05/20/2009
109 ortataiSTRIKING in all Epstein cases EXCEPT case no. 08-80119: Notice
be.
of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Epstein's
Motion to Compel and/or Identify. This Notice should only be filed in 08-
80119, not in all of the Epstein cases.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
5/20/2009. Associated Cages: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (1c3) (Entered:
05/20/2009)
05/20/2009
110 RESPONSE/REPLY to 91 Response in Opposition to Motion To Compel
Answers To Discovery by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # I Exhibit "A", # 2
Exhibit "B")(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/20/2009)
05/21/2009
Ill Plaintiffs MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to (91 in 9:08-
cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of
Case and Third-Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90) by Jane Doe No.
6, Jane Doe No. 7, Jane Doe, Jane Doe No. 5, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No.
3. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Mermelstein, Stuart)
(Entered: 05/21/2009)
05/22/2009
112 NOTICE of Compliance with S.D.Fla.L.R.7.1(A)(3) by Jeffrey Epstein re 104
Defendant's MOTION to Strike Cases from Current Trial Docket filed by
Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/22/2009)
05/2212009
.111 Plaintiffs MOTION Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion
for No-Contact Order by Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101. (Attachments:
# 1 Exhaj?it A - Portion to Plea Transcript, # 2 Exhibit B - 4/17/09 letter, ii 2
Exhibit i - 5/16/09 e-mail, # 4 Exhibit D - 5/18/09 letter, # 5 Exhibit E -
5/21/09 letter, # € Text of Proposed OrderXJosefsberg, Robert) (Entered:
05/22/2009)
05/26/2009
114 Plaintiffs MOTION to Preserve Evidence Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and
Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # a Text of Proposed Order)
Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM, 9:09-cv-80591-ICAM, 9:09-cv-
80656-KAM(Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/26/2009)
05/27/2009
II5 RESPONSE in Opposition re 101 Plaintiffs MO
Extension of Time
to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Identirfr
in Third-Party
Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua
Sponse, With Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
(Attachments: ii 1 Exhibit "A")(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
05/27/2009
114 NOTICE by Jane Doe it (111 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Plaintiffs MOTION
for Extension of Time to File Response as to (91 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM)
Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-
Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90)Plaintiffs MOTION for Extension
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175605
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
L
of Time to File Response as to (91 in 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) Defendant's
MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-Party
Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90) (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed
Order)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Horowitz, Adam)
(Entered: 05/27/2009)
05/28/2009
117 ORDER STRIKING Notice by Jane Doe in all Epstein cases EXCEPT in case
08-80119. This Notice should only be filed in 08-80119, not in all of the
Epstein cases... Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/28/2009. Associated
Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (1c3) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
05/28/2009
118 Notice of Supplemental Authority re 67 Defendant's MOTION to Compel
Response to 1st RTP, 448 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Answers to 1st
Interrog y Jeffrey Epstein (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # a
Exhibit Ill(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
05/28/2009
1_19
OP VIDag- , ranting 194 Motion to Continue as to Jane Does 2-7 and reserved as
to allii and Jane Doe 80893. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
5/28/2009. (ir) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
05/29/2009
ID NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marie a
on behalf of
9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.
05129/2009)
alit
Marrerra(Enteredi"tedCases:
05/29/2009
DJ RESPONSE to Motion re (72 in 9:08-cv-80380-ICAM) Defendant's MOTION
to Stay re (62) Amended Complaint, (57 in 9:08-cv-80232-KAM) Defendant's
MOTION to Stay re (50) Amended Complaint, (24 in 9:08-cv-80893-ICAM)
Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (1) Complaint, (23 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM)
Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (18) Amended Complaint, (22 in 9:08-cv-
80993-1CAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (19) Amended Complaint, (65
in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (56) Amended
Complaint, (68 in 9:08-cv-80381-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Stay re (60)
Amended Complaint, (51 in 9:08-cv-80811-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to
Stay re (40) Amended Complaint and or Continue Action Filed Pursuant to
Court's Order Requesting Government's Position filed by United States of
A
'
ligailue by 6/8/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et
al.
Marie) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
IIII
05/29/2009
122 ENDORSED ORDER granting 1.11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
re 9J Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and
Third-Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket entry 90). Jane Does 2-7 Responses
due by 6/11/2009. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/28/2009. (ir)
(Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
123 NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein re .19_2 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of
Time to File Reply as to (39 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition
to Motion, (40 in 9:08-cv-80994-ICAM) Response in Opposition to
MotionDefendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to (39 in
9:08-cv-80994-ICAM) Response in Opposition to Motion, (40 in 9:08-cv-
80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion (Attachments: # 1 Text of
Proposed Order Proposed onierXPike, Michael) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
124 RESPONSE in Opposition re (90 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175606
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 19 of 21
MOTION to Compel Identifi Doe in Style of Case and in Third-Party
Subpoenas, (91 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION to Compel
Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-Party Subpoenas (replaces Docket
entry 90) filed by Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101. Associated Cases:
9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
125 ORDER STRIKING (124 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, 105 in 9:08-cv-80811-
ICAM, 74 in 9:08-cv-80993-KAM, 72 in 9:08-cv-80893-KAM, 106 in 9:08-
cv-80232-KAM, 123 in 9:08-cv-80380-KAM, 35 in 9:09-cv-80591-ICAM, 25
in 9:09-cv-80469-KAM, 60 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM, 22 in 9:09-cv-80656-
KAM, 107 in 9:08-cv-80381-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion, filed
by Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101 DO NOT FILE IN EVERY
EPSTEIN CASE. SEE ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES.. Signed by
Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/29/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-
1CAM et al. (1c3) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
12¢ ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 0 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 5.6
Amended Complaint : Motion Hearing set for 6/12/2009 10:00 AM in West
Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Signed by Judge
Kenneth A. Marra on 5/29/2009. (ir) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
122 RESPONSE to Motion re al Plaintiffs MOTION Plaintiffs Jane Doe No.
101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order filed by Jeffrey
Epstein. Replies due by 6/8/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)
(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
128 MOTION for Leave to File UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT by Jane Doe No. 102,
Jane Doe No. 101. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Ezell,
Katherine) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
05/29/2009
122 MOTION for Hearing MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING by Jane Doe
No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.
(Josefsberg, Robert) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
06/01/2009
Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: Calendar Call set for 5/28/2010 10:00 AM
in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra., Jury Trial set
for 6/1/2010 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth
A. Marra., Discovery due by 12/11/2009., Dispositive Motions due by
1/8/2010. (ir) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
06/01/2009
130 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 129 Motion to Reschedule
Hearing. The hearing will not be reset. However, Robert Josefsberg may
r tel honically. Mr. Josefsberg shall contact the courtroom deputy at
chambers at least 24 hours prior to the hearing.. Signed by
Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 06/01/09. (1c3) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
06/01/2009
131 Sealed Document. (igo) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
06/01/2009
n2 ORDER Granting R2 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
Defendant's Motion to Compel. Response due by 5/6/2009. Signed by
Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 6/1/2009. (sa) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
https://ectflsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175607
CWECF - Live Database - flsd
1
Page 20 of 21
06/03/2009
na Defendant's MOTION for Limited Admission by Telephone by Jeffrey
Epstein. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Text of Proposed Order Order)
(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 06/03/2009)
06/03/2009
134 ORDER Granting 1Q2 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time until 5/20/09
to file a Reply to Plaintiffs' Jane Does 2-7 Responses in Opposition to Motion
to Compel Answers to First set of Interrogatories and First Request to
Produce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 6/3/2009. (sa)
(Entered: 06/03/2009)
06/03/2009
,..
135 Clerks Notice of Instruction to Filer Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion.
Pursuant to 2B in the Administrative Procedures, a motion to make a limited
appearance must be filed in the conventional manner along with the applicable
filing fee. LOCAL COUNSEL IS INSTRUCTED TO 1. FILE A NOTICE TO
STRIKE DE# 133 Defendant's MOTION for Limited Admission by
Telephone filed by Jeffrey Epstein AND 2. CONVENTIONALLY FILE AN
WITH THE APPLICABLE FILING FEE. (cw) (Entered: 06/03/2009)
06/04/2009
13n REPLY to Response to Motion re (113 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Plaintiffs
MOTION Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-
Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane
Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101,
Jane Doe No. 102. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Ezell,
Katherine) (Entered: 06/04/2009)
06/04/2009
137 ORDER STRIKING (112 in 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM, 111 in 9:08-cv-80232-
KAM, 136 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, 111 in 9:08-cv-80811-KAM, 128 in 9:08-
cv-80380-KAM, 65 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM, 79 in 9:08-cv-80893-KAM, 42
in 9:09-cv-80591-KAM, 27 in 9:09-cv-80656-KAM, 32 in 9:09-cv-80469-
KAM, 79 in 9:08-cv-80993-KAM) Reply to Response to Motion, filed by
Jane Doe No. 102, Jane Doe No. 101 Document stricken for failure to follow
Court's orders. DO NOT FILE A DOCUMENT IN EVERY EPSTEIN CASE
if it is to be filed only in 08-80119. See Case Management Order and contact
CWECF Support for assistance in proper filing.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 6/4/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM et al. (1c3)
(Entered: 06/04/2009)
06/04/2009
138 ORDER denying 133 Motion for Limited Admission by telephone. See Clerks
Office's instructions in DE 135. The attorneys may file motions to appear
telephonically at the hearing if their pro hac vice motions, filed conventionally
06/04/09, are granted.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 06/04/2009.
(Ic3) (Entered: 06/04/2009)
06/05/2009
132 NOTICE of Striking 133 Defendant's MOTION for Limited Admission by
Telephone filed by Jeffrey Epstein by Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael)
(Entered: 06/05/2009)
06/05/2009
140 MOTION for Limited Appearance by Telephone for Martin G. Weinberg,
Filing Fee $75.00, Receipt #725916. (cw) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
06/05/2009
141 STRICKEN BY DE 142 Notice of Supplemental Authority re 124 Response
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DIctRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175608
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
Page 21 of 21
in Opposition to Motion, 11,1 Plaintiffs MOTION Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101
and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order, a Defendant's MOTION
to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-Party Subpoenas
(replaces Docket entry 90) by Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael) Modified on
6/8/2009 (tp). (Entered: 06/05/2009)
06/05/2009
142 NOTICE of Striking 141 Notice of Supplemental Authority, filed by Jeffrey
Epstein by Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
06/05/2009
14,1 Notice of Supplemental Authority re 24 Response in Opposition to Motion, 6,2
Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP, 9 Response in
Opposition to Motion, 119 Response/Reply (Other), 68 Defendant's MOTION
to Compel Answers to 1st Interrogs by Jeffrey Epstein (Pike, Michael)
(Entered: 06/05/2009)
06/08/2009
144 RESPONSE to Motion re (91 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Defendant's MOTION
to Compel Identity of Doe in Style of Case and Third-Party Subpoenas
(replaces Docket entry 90) filed by Jane Doe. Replies due by 6/18/2009.
(Attachments: # I Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-
ICAM et al.(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 06/08/2009)
06/08/2009
14,E NOTICE by Jane Doe re (113 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Plaintiffs MOTION
Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe IO2's Motion for No-Contact Order
-Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 Notice of Joinder Associated Cases: 9:08-ev-80119-
KAM et al.(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 06/08/2009)
06/08/2009
14k RESPONSE in Opposition re 144 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Cases from
Current Trial Docket filed by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered:
06/08/2009)
06/08/2009
147 RESPONSE in Opposition re 104 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Cases from
Current Trial Docket filed by
.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2
Exhibit 2)(Hill, Jack) (Entered: 06/08/2009)
06/09/2009
. 14$ Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct e Answer to Amended Complaint
by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 6/26/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
"A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # a Text of Proposed Order Order)(Pike, Michael)
(Entered: 06/09/2009)
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
06/09/2009 15:28:57
PACER Login: du4480
Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report Search Criteria: K
9:Am08-c
v-80119-
rBillable Pages: 16
Cost:
1.28
•
https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1
6/9/2009
EFTA00175609
Case 9:08-cv-80,
1-KAM
Document 40
Entered
'LSD Docket 0;
,/2008
Page 1 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Defendant.
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and Rule 7.1(A) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of
Florida, moves to dismiss Count I of plaintiff's complaint,' and states as follows:
' The time to answer the remaining allegations of the complaint is tolled pending the Court's
ruling on the present motion. See Beaulieu I Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of W. Fla., No.
3:07cv30/RV/BMT, 2007 WI, 2020161, * 2 (N. . Fla. July 9, 2007) (holding that defendant's
partial motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has
ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan t Univ. of Rochester Med. Ctr., 180 F.R.D. 247,
249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the ling of a motion that only addresses part of a
complaint suspends the time to res nd to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the
subject of the motion"); Schwartz
Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL
i
579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1 7) (noting that there is significant case law to support the
position that "when a defendant files a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss, addressing only some of
the claims contained in the plaintiff's complaint, the defendant is not required to file an answer
until the court rules on the motion to dismiss").
EFTA00175610
Case 9:08-cv-8C
\ -KAM
Document 40
Entered a
'LSD Docket 0:
/2008
Page 2 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
ALLEGATIONS IN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
This action arises out of the alleged assault of the plaintiff. According to the
allegations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him
"a massage for monetary compensation" (Compl. ¶ 12), where Mr. Epstein
allegedly assaulted her "in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes."
(Compl. ¶ 18).
The plaintiff tries to assert a claim for sexual assault (Compl. ¶¶ 15-19.)
This theory of liability, however, cannot be supported by the allegations in the
complaint. In fact, even if everything in the complaint were true, recovery against
Jeffrey Epstein, for Count I, under any formulation, is impossible under Florida
law. Accordingly, this count must be dismissed.
ARGUMENT
A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) should be granted when a
court cannot identify "each of the material elements necessary to sustain a
recovery under some viable legal theory." Snow'. DirectTV, Inc., 450 F.3d 1314,
1320 (I lth Cir. 2006) (quoting Roe'. Aware Woman Ctr. For Choice, Inc., 253
F.3d 678, 684 (11th Cir. 2001)). Moreover, a court should dismiss a complaint
"when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual
allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Educ. I.
Marshal County Gas Dist, 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a
2
EFTA00175611
Case 9:08-cv-80
'-KAM
Document 40
Entered I
'LSD Docket Ot
/2008
Page 3 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
motion to dismiss, plaintiffs must do more than merely state legal conclusions;
they are required to allege some specific factual bases for those conclusions . . ."
Holt'. Grist, No. 06-14617, 2007 WI, 1156938, *2 (11th Cir. Apr. 19, 2007). As
such, "conclusory allegations, unwarranted deductions of facts or legal conclusions
masquerading as facts will not prevent dismissal." Snow, 450 F.3d at 1320.
I.
Count I Fails to State a Cause of Action For Assault Recognized by
Florida Law.
The plaintiff attempts to plead a cause of action against Mr. Epstein for
"sexual assault" based on a "violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes"2 for
the "lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane Doe." (Compl.
18.) Plaintiff cannot assert a cause of action for "violation of Chapter 800, Florida
Statutes" because there is no private right of action under that Chapter. See
generally Am. Home Assurance Co." Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So. 2d 360, 374
(Fla. 2005) (observing that "not every statutory violation carries a civil remedy"
(citing Villazonl. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla.
2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. l. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.
Fla. 1985) (King,
(holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion
statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages).
2 Chapter 800, Florida Statutes, is entitled, "Lewdness; Indecent Exposure."
3
EFTA00175612
Case 9:08-cv-80
-KAM
Document 40
Entered I
'LSD Docket Of.
/2008
Page 4 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRAJJOHNSON
Where a plaintiff brings a civil action pursuant to a criminal statute that
provides no civil remedy, her complaint is properly dismissed for failure to state a
cause of action. See Mantoothl. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA
1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping
where "the mentioned statutes concern only criminal violations and do not afford
a civil remedy") (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
Even if Chapter 800 provided a civil remedy (which it does not) the statute
does not apply to the plaintiff. The statute prohibits sexual activity with or lewd or
lascivious offenses against "a person . . . less than 16 years of age." § 800.04, Fla.
Stat. (2008) (emphasis added).
By her own admission, the plaintiff was
"approximately 16 years old." (Comp(. I 8.) (emphasis added). Plainly, the
plaintiff falls outside of the scope of the statute's protection. Accordingly, the
plaintiff's claim for sexual assault against Mr. Epstein, pursuant to a violation of
Chapter 800, Florida Statutes, must be dismissed.
Should the Court look beyond the plain language of the plaintiff's complaint
and construe Count I as a claim for common-law assault, that claim would also
fail. As the court explained in Lay" Kremer, 411 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1982), an assault is "an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to
another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward another under such
circumstances as to create a fear of imminent peril, coupled with the apparent
4
EFTA00175613
Case 9:08-cv-8a
-KAM
Document 40
Entered'
LSD Docket OE
/2008
Page 5 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
present ability to effectuate the attempt." An assault thus requires "an affirmative
act—a threat to use force, or the actual exertion of force." Sullivan, AIL Fed.
Say. & Loan Assoc., 454 So. 2d 52, 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (affirming dismissal of
assault claim where there was no affirmative act).
In this case, there is no such affirmative act. The only thing that Mr. Epstein
is alleged to have said to the plaintiff is "to take off her clothes" and "to give him a
massage." (Compl. ¶ 12.) These allegations fall far short of an "offer of corporal
injury by force." There are no allegations that Jane Doe was placed in any fear of
imminent peril. See Gatto 's. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla.
3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was
placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff does
not even allege that Mr. Epstein touched her. Thus, there was no assault.
Accordingly, because the plaintiff has failed to plead a cause of action for
assault recognized in Florida, Count I against Mr. Epstein must be dismissed.
Conclusion
For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully
requests that Count I of the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed.
5
EFTA00175614
Case 9:08-cv-80
-KAM
Document 40
Entered I
LSD Docket OS
'2008
Page 6 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Respectfully submitted,
3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
Tel:
Fax:
By: /s/ Michael R. Thin
GUY A. LEWIS
MICHAEL R. TEIN
WEISS, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm
Palm
Florida 33401
Tel.
Fax.
By:
Jack A. Goldberger
Fla. Bar No. 262013
[email protected]
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTT1ER &
COLEMAN, LLP
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West
Florida 33401
Tel.
Fax.
6
EFTA00175615
Case 9:08-cv-80(
•KAM
Document 40
Entered d
LSD Docket Ofd
'2008
Page 7 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
By: Robert D. Critton, Esq.
Fla. Bar No. 224162
[email protected]
Michael J. Pike, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Jetty Epstein
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1
Undersigned counsel has conferred in good faith with counsel for the
plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
/s/ Michael R. Tein
Michael R. Tein
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 4, 2008, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the
foregoing document is being served this day on all individuals on the following
service list via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
/s/ Michael It Thin
Michael R. Tein
EFTA00175616
Case 9:08-cv-80(
•KAM
Document 40
Entered d
LSD Docket OR
2008
Page 8 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Service List
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
Herman & Mennelstein, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218
Miami Florida 33160
Fax:
8
EFTA00175617
Case 95118-cci-80i
LKAM
Document 56
Entered c.
LSD Docket 02.
2009
Page 1 of 8
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Defendant.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey
Epstein, as follows:
Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
1.
Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui
juris.
2.
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the
Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a
minor.
3.
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
4.
This is an action for damages in excess of $50 million.
5.
This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28
§1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs;
and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
6.
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28
§1391(a) as a substantial
part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
- I -
EFTA00175618
.
Case 9:08-6-80(
-KAM
Document 56
Entered ci
LSD Docket 02
2009
Page 2 of 8
Factual Allegations
7.
At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52
• years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to
billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his
principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach,
FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
8.
Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for
underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily
economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave
them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's
trap and became one of his victims.
9.
Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted
girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas.
10.
Epstein's scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit underage girls. (Upon
information and belief, the young girl who brought Jane Doe to Epstein was herself a minor victim
of Epstein, and will therefore not be named in this Complaint). Under Epstein's plan, underage girls
were recruited ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm
Beach mansion. The recruiter would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm
Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf would direct
the recruiter to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. The recruiter, upon information
and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from western Palm
Beach County who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally $200 to $300 per
"massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have
- 2 -
EFTA00175619
Case 9:08-u-80
-KAM
Document 56
Entered J
LSD Docket 02i
2009
Page 3 of 8
credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of
Epstein's plan.
11.
Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at
Epstein's mansion, the underage victim would be introduced to
Epstein's assistant,
who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number. Ms.
would then bring the girl up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition
to othcr furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway hall and in the
bedroom. The girl would then find herself alone in the room with Epstein, who would be wearing
only a towel. He would then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, and direct the girl
to remove her clothes. Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts,
including
and
the
12.
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Jane Doe was recruited to give
Epstcin a massage for monetary compensation. Jane was brought to Epstein's mansion in Palm
Beach. Once at the mansion, Jane was introduced to
who led her up the flight of
stairs to the room with the massage table. In this room, Epstein told Jane to take off her clothes and
give him a massage. Jane kept her panties and bra on and complied with Epstein's instructions.
Epstein wore only a towel around his waste. After a short period of time, Epstein removed the towel
and rolled over.
Epstein began to masturbate and he sexually assaulted Jane.
13.
After Epstein had completed the assault, Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the
room and go back down the stairs. Jane was paid $200 by Epstein. The young girl who recruited
Jane was paid $100 by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
14.
As a result of this encounter with Epstein, Jane experienced confusion, shame,
humiliation and embarrassment, and has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries.
- 3 -
EFTA00175620
.
Case 9:08-j-80
-KAM
Document 56
Entered
I
LSD Docket 02,
2009
Page 4 of 8
COUNT I
Sexual Assault and Battery
15.
Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
16.
Epstein acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Jane Doe, or an imminent
apprehension of such a contact, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension.
17.
Epstein made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane
Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril.
18.
Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Jane Doe,
with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent.
19.
Epstein tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein's acts
were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
20.
Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were
done willfully and maliciously.
21.
As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and
will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and
emotional damages.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this
Court deems just and proper.
COUNT H
Intentiimal Infliction of Emotional Distress
22.
Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
23.
Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
24.
Epstein's conduct with a minor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds
- 4 -
EFTA00175621
.
Case 9118-6-80
.KAM
Document 56
Entered
LSD Docket 02/
2009
Page 5 of 8
of decency.
25.
Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted
in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or
emotional health to be significantly impaired.
26.
Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doc. Epstein knew or had
reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and
damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing
severe emotional distress to Jane Doe.
27.
As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane
Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this
Court deems just and proper.
COUNT III
Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 I.
$2422
28.
Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
29.
Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade,
induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or
sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.
30.
On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida §§ 796.07
and 796.03, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case nos. 2008-cf-
009381AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and
scheme as alleged herein.
31.
As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of
- 5 -
EFTA00175622
Case 9:08-cv-80
KAM
Document 56
Entered I
LSD Docket 02,
2009
Page 6 of 8
Florida Statute §796.07(2) (including subsections
(d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) thereof), and other
criminal offenses including violations of Florida Statutes §§798.02 and 800.04 (including
subsections (5), (6) and (7) thereof).
32.
Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 181= §2422.
33.
As a result of Epstein's violation of 181= §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal
injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
34.
Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them a
reasonable attorneys' fee.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein for all damages available under 18 ill
§2255(a), including without limitation, actual
and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as
this Court deems just and proper.
Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action on all claims so triable.
Dated: February 27, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
By:
s/ Adam D. Horowitz
Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
ssmasexabuseattomev.com
6980)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
Miami-
60
Tel:
Fax:
- 6 -
EFTA00175623
Case 9:08-cV-80(
•KAM
Document 56
Entered
LSD Docket 02/
2009
Page 7 of 8
I hereby certify that on February 27, 2009,1 electronically filed the foregoing document with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this
day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of
Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those
parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
- 7 -
EFTA00175624
Case 9:08-cv-80'
KAM
Document 56
Entered q
LSD Docket 02/
?009
Page 8 of 8
SERVICE LIST
DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jack Alan Goldber cr Esq.
Robert D. Critton. Esq.
Is/ Adam D. Horowitz
- 8 -
EFTA00175625
Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enter
in FLSD Docket
D2/2009
Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2
I
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his
undersigned attorneys, files his Answer to the Second Amended Complaint and states:
1. Without knowledge and deny.
2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment
privilege against self-Incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d
1099 (Fla. 41b DCA 1983)• Malloy I
Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth
Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "Mt would be incongruous to have different
standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared
prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5
Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-
incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a
specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —
.. a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting
EFTA00175626
'
Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enter(
n FLSD Docket;
32/2009
Page 2 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 i Epstein
Page 2
the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute
the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff
bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
3. As to the allegations In paragraph 3, deny.
4. As to the allegations in paragraph 4, deny.
5. As to the allegations in paragraph 5, without knowledge and deny.
6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment
privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d
1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth
Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different
standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared
prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court"); 5
Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-
Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a
specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur 2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —
"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting
the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute
the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff
bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
7. As to the allegations in paragraphs 7 through 14 of Plaintiff's Second Amended
Complaint, Defendant exercises his Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-
EFTA00175627
Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enter(
n FLSD Docket
02/2009
Page 3 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 J Epstein
Page 3
incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA
1983); Malloy J Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-
Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment - "[fit would be incongruous to have different standards
determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution,
depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. &
Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific
denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2c1 Evidence §592. Defendants In civil actions. —"... a civil
defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the
privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the
kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing
a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
8.
In response to the allegations of paragraph 15, Defendant realleges and adopts
his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth
in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
9. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-Incrimination to
the allegations set forth In paragraphs 16 through 21 of the Second Amended
Complaint See DeLisi
Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983);
Malloy J. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination
Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment - "[fit would be incongruous to have different standards determine the
EFTA00175628
Case 9:08-cv
I 19-KAM
Document 69
Enters
n FLSD Docket
)2/2009
Page 4 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 ' Epstein
Page 4
validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on
whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court"); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d
§1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must
treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24
Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises
an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-
incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary
application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking
affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
10. In response to the allegations of paragraph 22, Defendant realleges and adopts
his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth
in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
11. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to
the allegations set forth in paragraphs 23 through 27 of the Second Amended
Complaint. See DeLisi I Bankers ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983);
Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination
Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the
validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on
whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d
§1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must
treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24
EFTA00175629
Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enten
in FLSD Docket.
02/2009
Page 5 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 I Epstein
Page 5
Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises
an affirmative defense Is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-
Incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary
application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking
affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
12. In response to the allegations of paragraph 28, Defendant realleges and adopts
his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth
in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
13. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to
the allegations set forth in paragraphs 29 through 34 of the Second Amended
Complaint. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983);
Malloy I. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination
Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment - "Mt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the
validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on
whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court.")• 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc, Civ. 3d
§1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must
treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24
Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises
an affirmative defense Is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-
Incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary
EFTA00175630
Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enten
)n FLSD Docket.
02/2009
Page 6 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 1 Epstein
Page 6
application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking
affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff.
Affirmative Defenses
1. As to all counts, Plaintiff consented to and was a willing participant in the acts
alleged.
2. As to all counts alleged, Plaintiff consented to and participated in conduct similar
and/or identical to the acts alleged with other persons which were the sole or
contributing cause of Plaintiffs alleged damages
3. As to all counts, Defendant reasonably believed that the Plaintiff had attained the
age of 18 years old at the time of the alleged acts.
4. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the rejipf sought by Plaintiff.
Robert D. Cfitton, Jr.
Attorney f r Defendant Epstein
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being
served this day on all counsel of re rg,jpentified on the following Service List in the
manner specified by CM/ECF on this
y of April , 2009:
EFTA00175631
.Case 9:08-cv
119-KAM
Document 69
Enter(
n FLSD Docket
02/2009
Page 7 of 7
Jane Doe No. 2 I. Epstein
Page 7
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2218
60
ax:
ssm
orne .com
ahorowitzasexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
Jack Alan Goldberger
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
o- ounse or e endant Jeffrey Epstein
Respectfully sub
By:
Florida Bar o. 224162
rcritabcicl w.com
Florida Bar #617296
mpikeabcIclaw.com
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
000
or
1
B ach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
(Co- ounse
efendant Jeffrey Epstein)
EFTA00175632
. Case 9:08-cv-f.,.. 19-KAM
Docun',..
46
Enterea
FLSD Docket 10k. ..2008
Page 1 of 10
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 2
1.
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
DEFENDANT'S, EPSTEIN, MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE
DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves
to dismiss and for more definite statement of Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 2's Amended
Complaint. Rules 12(b)(6), and 12(e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). In support of his
motion, Defendant states:
Introduction
Defendant is filing similar motions to dismiss and for more definite statement
directed to the Amended Complaints filed against Defendant in this Court in JANE DOE
NO. 2, JANE DOE NO. 3, JANE DOE NO. 4 and JANE DOE NO. 5. The motions are
directed to the Counts for "Sexual Assault and Battery," and "Coercion and Enticement
to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18
. §2422" in each of the respective complaints.
However, there are distinctions in the four motions filed based on the complaint
allegations. For example, Defendant challenges the Plaintiffs' allegations as to assault
in all four actions, and challenges the battery allegations in JANE DOE NOS. 2 and 3,
EFTA00175633
. Case 9:08-cv-L. .19-KAM
Docum. 146
Enterea
FLSD Docket 10/. ,2008
Page 2 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 2
but not in JANE DOE NOS. 4 and 5. Defendant moves to dismiss the §2422 count in all
four actions.
Motion
1. Counts I and III of the Amended Complaint are required to be dismissed for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has
failed to allege sufficient factual allegations in the Counts and instead alleges labels and
conclusions, and an attempted formulaic recitation of the elements in each Count.
2. In the alternative, Defendant seeks more definite statement of Count I and III. In
Count I, the Plaintiff is required to more definitely allege what was done to her; what
EPSTEIN said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff; what
was the intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and
battery. In Count III, Plaintiff is required to more definitely state the underlying factual
allegations to support her claim as set forth in the statute, 18
. §2422(b) and
§2455. Rule 12(e). See discussion of law below herein.
3. Also, Plaintiffs reference in Count III to 28
. §2255, pertaining to habeas
corpus proceedings is required to be stricken as immaterial. Rule 12(f). Plaintiff is
required to more definitely state what statutory provision she is relying on. Rule 12 (e).
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court dismiss Counts I and
III, strike the immaterial statutory reference, and require Plaintiff to more definitely plead
the underlying elements of her claims.
Supporting Memorandum of Law
Standard on Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss
As established by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp.'. Twombly, 127
S.Ct. 1955 (2007), a motion to dismiss should be granted if the plaintiff does not plead
EFTA00175634
Case 9:08-cv-L .19-KAM
Docuri... 1c 46
Enteret, i FLSD Docket 10/, 42008
Page 3 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 3
"enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Id, at 1974.
Although the complaint need not provide detailed factual allegations, the basis for relief
in the complaint must state "more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic
recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Id, at 1965. Further, "[f]actual
allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level ... on the
assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact)." Id.
On a motion to dismiss, the well pleaded allegations of plaintiffs complaint are taken as
true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.
L. DeKalb County
Sch. Dist., 446 F.3d 1153, 1156 (11th Cir.2006).
Significantly, the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp.'. Twombly abrogated the
often cited observation that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a
claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove not set of facts in
support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley
I. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme
Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can] survive a
motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings le[ave] open the possibility that a plaintiff
might later establish some %et of [undisclosed] facts' to support recovery." Id. As
explained by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp., supra at 1664-65:
While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) moti
to dismiss does not
need detailed factual allegations ibid.; Saniva
. American Bd. of
Psychiatry and Neurology. Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251
.7 1994), a plaintiffs
obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief' requires
more than labels and conclusions, and a formulpic recitation of the elements
of a cause of action will not do, see Papasan I. AIlain, 478 U.S. 265, 286,
106 S.Ct. 2932, 92 L.Ed.2d 209 (1986) (on a motion to dismiss, courts "are
not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual
allegation"). Factual allegations naist be enough to raise a right to relief
above the speculative level, see 5
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and
EFTA00175635
Case 9:08-cv-i„ .19-KAM
Docuri, 146
Enterer, ...i FLSD Docket 10i„,2008
Page 4 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 4
Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller)
("[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement of facts
that merely creates a suspicion [of] a legally cognizable right of action"), on
the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if
doubtful in fact), see, e.g., Swierkiewicz ii. Soremail. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508,
n.
1,
122
S.Ct.
992,
152
L.Ed.2d
1 (2002
; Neitzke
. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,
327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989) ( Rule 12(b)(6) does not
I
countenance ... dismissals b sed on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's
factual allegations"); Scheuer . Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683,
40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a we -pleaded complaint may proceed even if it
appears "that a recovery is very remote and unlikely").
Pursuant to Rule 12(e), a party may move for more definite statement of a
pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed where the pleading "is so vague or
ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably frame a response." The motion is required
to point out the defects and the desired details. Id.
Count I — "Sexual Assault and Battery" is sublect to dismissal as Plaintiff has
failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
It is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action.
Erie R.Co. I. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Pursuant to Florida law, although the term
"assault and battery" is most commonly referred to as if it were a legal unit, or a single
concept, "assault and battery are separate and distinct legal concepts, assault being the
beginning of an act which, if consummated, constitutes battery." 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault
§1. An assault and battery are intentional acts. See generally, Spivey'. Battaglia 258
So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972); and Travelers lndem. Co.'. PCR. Inc., 889 So.2d 779 (Fla.
2004).
An "assault" is an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force,
or exertion of force directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a
reasonable fear of imminent peril. See Lay'. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA
1982). It must be premised upon an affirmative act - a threat to use force, or the actual
EFTA00175636
Case 9:08-cv-t, ,19-MM
Docum,. 46
Enteret,
FLSD Docket 10k.42008
Page 5 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 5
exertion of force. See 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault §1("The essential element of the tort of
assault is the violence offered, and not actual physical contact.").
Tort of "battery" consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon
another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is
imminent. Quilling'. Price 894 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)• Sullivan
Atlantic
Federal Savings & Loan 454 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)("a battery consists of the
intentional infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon the person of another"). See
3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault §1.
With the standard of pleading established in Twomblv, supra, in the context of
the elements for assault and battery, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6). As to the elements of assault, here are no factual
allegations as to what was said or done to Plaintiff such that it constituted an
"intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or exertion of force
directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a reasonable fear of
imminent peril." See ¶12 of Am. Comp. The same is true for the claim of battery.
Plaintiff makes the general allegation that "he (Defendant) sexually assaulted Jane."
The other allegations in ¶12 pertain to what Plaintiff allegedly did. Under applicable law,
Plaintiff is required to give more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation
of the elements of a cause of action. Twombly, supra. Plaintiff is required to allege the
facts of what was done to her; what EPSTEIN said and did, if anything, to create fear
and apprehension in Plaintiff; what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact?
As noted in the introduction and as this Court is well aware, there is more than
one action brought against this Defendant attempting to allege similar sounding claims.
EFTA00175637
Case 9:08-cv-L .19-KAM
Docurrk_.I 46
Enterec., _.1 FLSD Docket 10k .,2008
Page 6 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 6
With all due respect, the details as to a particular claim asserted by a particular Plaintiff
are important to give this Defendant fair notice of Plaintiffs claim so he may properly
respond. Accordingly, under applicable law, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for
sexual assault and battery.
In the alternative to dismissing Count I, Defendant requests that Plaintiff be
required to give more definite statement as to what was done to her; what EPSTEIN
said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff; what was the
intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and battery.
Rule 12(e).
Ill — "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18
42422" - Is subject to dismissal as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim
upon which relief can be grill
Rule 12(b)(8). Count Ill also contains an
immaterial reference to 28
. 42255, which is required to be stricken
and more definitely stated.
Count III of Plaintiffs Complaint attempts to assert a claim for "Coercion and
Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18
. §2422." In her prayer for relief in
Count III, Plaintiff "demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all
damages available under 28
. §2255(a),
."
Although the reference to "28
§2255," pertaining to habeas corpus
proceedings - federal custody and remedies on motion attacking sentence, is probably
a typographical error by Plaintiff, and the reference to "28" was meant to be "18,"
Defendant requests that Plaintiff correct this error so that Defendant may have fair
notice of the claim Plaintiff is attempting to assert.
Whether or not the "28" is
typographical error, Defendant is still entitled to dismissal of the count.
The applicable version of these statutory provisions, (pre-2006 Amendments, as
the Amended Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005," ¶8), provides:
EFTA00175638
Case 9:08-cv-L .19-KAM
Docurri. I( 46
Enteret.
FLSD Docket 10/, ,2008
Page 7 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 7
CHAPTER 117--TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY
§ 2422. Coercion and enticement
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any
individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or
Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual
activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or
attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
20 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign
commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the
United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any
individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution
or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned
not less than 5 years and not more than 30 years.
CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF
CHILDREN
§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241II) 2242 2243
2251, 2251A, 2252 2252A, 2260 2421, 2422 or 2423 of this title and who
suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any
appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual
damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable
attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be
deemed to have sustained damages of no less than $50,000 in value.
(b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the
complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in
the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after
the disability.
Relevant to Plaintiffs complaint, 18
. 2255(a) creates a civil remedy for "a
minor who is a victim of a violation of section ... 2422 ... of this title and who suffers
personal injury as a result of such violation ... ." Plaintiff has failed to plead any factual
allegations whatsoever pertaining to violations of 18
2422. Rather, Plaintiff has
alleged conclusory allegations simply attempting to track parts of the statutory language
EFTA00175639
• Case 9:08-cv-r.... .19-KAM
Docurrk.
46
la
.1 FLSD Docket 10i. ..2008
Page 8 of 10
Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson
Page No. 8
in the statute without underlying factual allegations pertaining to the Plaintiff and any
conduct by Defendant. See ¶29 of Am. Comp. Plaintiff's allegations, (or lack of factual
allegations), are precisely what the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Bell
Atlantic Corp. prohibits — Plaintiff's complaint alleges only "labels and conclusions, and
a (partial) formulaic recitation of the elements."
First, the Amended Complaint fails to designate whether Plaintiff is relying on
§2422(a) or §2422(b). Second, although the complaint does contain a partial tracking of
the language in 18
§2422(b), it contains absolutely no factual allegations
concerning the requisite "using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign
commerce" by Plaintiff to state a cause of action based on a violation of 18
2422(b). As well, there are no underlying factual allegations involving this Plaintiff as to
the requisite elements that a defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or
coerced any individual (Plaintiff in this case)