Jane Doe #2
Petitioner
Mentioned in 2 documents. Roles: Petitioner, Original Petitioner
Jane Doe #2 is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
4 sources for document mentions
court filing: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-1
“The document discusses a court case where two additional victims, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, sought ”
Court Order: 208-1
“The court denies the motions by Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 to join the action under Rule 21 and the m”
court filing: 9:08-cv-80736
“The document is a court filing by the US government arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement with ”
Epstein lawsuit details alleged sexual abuse scheme and property holdings
2025-11-11
“The passage repeats widely reported allegations about Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, property locations, a”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 13 documents”
Known Connections (6)
Document Mentions (4)
court filing: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-1
The document discusses a court case where two additional victims, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, sought to join the action as petitioners under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, and later, the original petitioners moved to amend their petition under Rule 15 to include them. The Government opposed both motions, and the court ultimately denied the motion to amend.
Court Order: 208-1
The court denies the motions by Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 to join the action under Rule 21 and the motion by Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to amend their pleadings under Rule 15. The court also strikes certain factual details from the record as immaterial and impertinent to the central claim.
court filing: 9:08-cv-80736
The document is a court filing by the US government arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein does not preclude future federal prosecution and that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) does not provide a basis for invalidating the agreement. The government asserts that due process requires adherence to the terms of the agreement and that petitioners have had opportunities to confer with government attorneys about Epstein's offenses.
Epstein lawsuit details alleged sexual abuse scheme and property holdings
The passage repeats widely reported allegations about Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, property locations, and recruitment tactics. It provides no new names, dates, financial transactions, or connections to h Jane Doe #2 filed a $50 million lawsuit alleging abuse by Epstein in 2008. Epstein is described as a financier with residences in New York, New Mexico, St. Thomas, and Palm Be Allegations detail a re
This dossier on Jane Doe #2 was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.