Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205212DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczekcegoyblack.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205212
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczekcegoyblack.com> Subject: Doe I. USAO Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:48:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline- Images: ATT00001 In a little while, I will be filing Epstein's omnibus reply in support of his motion to intervene. It is one pleading, that replies to your response and to Cassell's response. It was better and more efficient to do one pleading. It will be 19 pages. Do you oppose a motion to file an overlong pleading? Cassell says he opposes anything longer than 15 pages. Also, my reply to Cassell's response to the supplemental briefing filed by the would-be intervenor lawyers is due early next week. I will be filing a motion for an extension until October 31. Cassell has no objection. Can I say the govt has no objection either? Thanks, Jackie Perczek, Esq. The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczekcegoyblack.com> Subject: Doe I. USAO Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:48:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline- Images: ATT00001 In a little while, I will be filing Epstein's omnibus reply in support of his motion to intervene. It is one pleading, that replies to your response and to Cassell's response. It was better and more efficient to do one pleading. It will be 19 pages. Do you oppose a motion to file an overlong pleading? Cassell says he opposes anything longer than 15 pages. Also, my reply to Cassell's response to the supplemental briefing filed by the would-be intervenor lawyers is due early next week. I will be filing a motion for an extension until October 31. Cassell has no objection. Can I say the govt has no objection either? Thanks, Jackie Perczek, Esq. The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this transmission (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by email reply. Thank you. EFTA00205212

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.