Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205213DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205213
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: "Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Villafana" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:17:06 +0000 Importance Normal Thanks, and no problem. I was in Bogota too for 8 days visiting my family last week. >>> From: "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" <Ann.Marie.C.Villafanaglusdoj.gov> To: - [email protected] <JPerczek®royblack.com> CC: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <Dexter.Lee®usdoj.gov> Date: 9/29/2011 11:15 AM Subject: Re: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Dear Jackie, Of course. Thank you for being so accommodating with my previous requests. A. Marie Villafana, AUSA From: Jackie Peraek (malito:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:08 AM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Hi Marie, I would like to ask Judge Marra until October 14 to file replies re: Epstein's motion to intervene. I ran this by Paul Cassell who has no objection. Can I fil

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: "Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Villafana" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:17:06 +0000 Importance Normal Thanks, and no problem. I was in Bogota too for 8 days visiting my family last week. >>> From: "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" <Ann.Marie.C.Villafanaglusdoj.gov> To: - [email protected] <JPerczek®royblack.com> CC: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <Dexter.Lee®usdoj.gov> Date: 9/29/2011 11:15 AM Subject: Re: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Dear Jackie, Of course. Thank you for being so accommodating with my previous requests. A. Marie Villafana, AUSA From: Jackie Peraek (malito:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:08 AM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein/Doe I. USAO Hi Marie, I would like to ask Judge Marra until October 14 to file replies re: Epstein's motion to intervene. I ran this by Paul Cassell who has no objection. Can I file the motion as unopposed and tell the Judge that the govt does not object either? Thanks, Jackie Jackie Perczek, Esq. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 O: (305) 371-6421 Fax: (305) 358-2006 www.royblack.com The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this transmission (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by email reply. Thank you. EFTA00205213

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: I I I I a EFTA00209306 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIF

16p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (2020)

In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (2020) 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1020 955 Pad 1196 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. IN RE: Petitioner. No. 19-13843 (April 14, 2020) Synopsis Background: Alleged victim of child sexual abuse brought civil action against federal government, alleging that government violated Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with alleged victim before entering into non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with alleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's requested remedies were denied and the action was dismissed, 411 F.Supp.3d 1321. Alleged victim petitioned for writ of mandamus. (Holding:) The Court of Appeals, Newsom, Circuit Judge, held that as a matter of first im

44p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawyers Seek to Reopen Federal Case Against Jeffrey Epstein Over Secret Plea Deal

The passage details an active lawsuit alleging that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping a secret non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific off Lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does alleging a secre They argue federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of

5p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01711951

100p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.