Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205269DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Paul Cassell •ci

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205269
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Paul Cassell •ci To: "IN (USAFLS)" ' Cc: , • (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" >, Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: ORDER-omnibus-wrapup.pdf [tried to send this earlier, but it may not have gone out] Dear We haven't seen the sealed order granting the Government's motion for stay either. (Have you?). But, in any event, Judge Marra's order on June 19, 2013 (DE 190) specifically stated that "The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the Government [DE 130] is GRANTED. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of entry of this order, the Government shall . . . [produce various discovery]." For your convenience, I attach a copy of DE 190 ordering the Government to produce discovery within 30 days. So we are expecting to see you produce the bulk of our discovery on July 19, 2013, as specifically directed in DE 190 which granted our mo

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Paul Cassell •ci To: "IN (USAFLS)" ' Cc: , • (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" >, Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: ORDER-omnibus-wrapup.pdf [tried to send this earlier, but it may not have gone out] Dear We haven't seen the sealed order granting the Government's motion for stay either. (Have you?). But, in any event, Judge Marra's order on June 19, 2013 (DE 190) specifically stated that "The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the Government [DE 130] is GRANTED. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of entry of this order, the Government shall . . . [produce various discovery]." For your convenience, I attach a copy of DE 190 ordering the Government to produce discovery within 30 days. So we are expecting to see you produce the bulk of our discovery on July 19, 2013, as specifically directed in DE 190 which granted our motion to compel. Looking forward to moving the case towards a resolution. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112.0730 (phone) (fax) You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: M, (USAFLS) [ Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 5:24 PM To: Paul Cassell; .= I. (USAFLS) Cc: , (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Subject: RE: One additional discovery request in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. U.S., No. 08-80736 Paul, You have addressed your additional discovery request to the correct person. In the Court's order denying the government's motion to dismiss, the Court referenced "[t]he stay of discovery pending ruling on the government's motion to dismiss entered November 8, 2011 [DE #1231 is LIFTED." I checked back into my CM/ECF notifications on Outlook, EFTA00205269 and did not find any for D.E. 123. I checked the docket sheet, which indicates a sealed order being entered on November 9, 2011, which is D.E. U 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "[t]he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of other motions) the Court has yet to rule on this particular motion." From this, it appears petitioners also believed the Court had not ruled on the government's motion for stay. In any event, your e-mail states that "you look forward to receiving the discovery materials that the Court has ordered you to produce on the schedule that the Court has ordered them produced." What is your view as to the schedule that the Court has ordered the documents produced? Is that contained in D.E. 123? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Monday June 24 2013 4:07 PM To: I, (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) M Cc: , (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Subject: RE: One additional discovery request in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. U.S., No. 08-80736 Dear I am writing to confirm that you remain the person that we should be contacted with regard to the above-captioned case. If not, please advise as to who the appropriate contact person is (and please forward this message to that person). In light of the Court lifting the stay on discovery, we are writing send one additional discovery request. Of course, this request is in ADDITION to the requests previously sent. It should not be viewed as replacing the other discovery requests or extending the deadline for producing the materials covered by the other discovery requests. We look forward to receiving the discovery materials that the Court has ordered you to produce on the schedule that the Court has ordered them produced. Please let us know if you have any questions. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Voice: Fax: Email: http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&nameatassell Paul You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. EFTA00205270

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" czi To: (USAFL$)" ctl - - Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?l Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:17:00 +0000 Importance: Normal I will be at courthouse. Please call me on my cell. I have a plea that starts at 2:00. Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, January 11 2012 11:27 AM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?I Let's shoot for 1:30. Are you available then, (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda January 11, 2012 11:22 AM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?' (USAFLS) I have calendar call at 1:00 p.m. I should be back by 1:30. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:20 AM To: I. (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?' Sorry, first thing in the morning did not work out. Do you want to talk briefly now, or perhaps at 1:30? Alternatively, I can also call in after my doctor's appointment. Given the waits I often encounter th

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com>

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: Paul Cassell <cassell law.utah.edu> ow mgw att.ent <owlmgvv@att.ent>, "Maria Kelljchian (maria®pathtojustice.com)" <maria@pathtojustice.com> Cc: "Brad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com)" <brad@pathtojustice.com>, "Marvin Simeon" <MSimeon@royblack.com> Subject: RE: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul, Thanks for reaching out to me. Because it is 5:41 p.m. here in Miami, I am not able to get back to you today but will get back to you tomorrow. Jackie From: Paul Cassell [mallto:cassellp@law.utah.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:40 PM To: Jackie Perczek; owlmgw@att.ent; Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Cc: Brad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com); Marvin Simeon Subject: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Dear Jackie, We read with interest Epstein's recent

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:49:44 +0000 Importance: Normal I am out of the office for the afternoon. Can you send Paul the log in Word format? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 01:22 PM Subject: RE: Word version of privilege log Would you be willing to extend us a small favor? It would be helpful if we had a Word / Wordperfect version (or native PDF version) of your two privilege logs, so that we can "cut and paste" responses etc. Would you be willing to provide that to us? Thanks in advance for any help you are willing to extend. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:03 AM Subject: RE: other victims Please see attached information about the victims' requests for production. If this allows the Government to provide us any more information, please let us know promptly. Thanks for your

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.