Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00207934DOJ Data Set 9Other

Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00207934
Pages
5
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: extra pages Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:07:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks for asking -- yes everything went smoothly. Paul Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. C. :fa , is Subject: RE: extra pages No objection to the extra pages. I hope that all went well on Friday. ----Original Message-- From: Paul Cassell [mailto:cassellp©law.utah.edu] Sent: Sunday December 04 2011 1:55 PM Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: extra pages Sorry I had to leave the call early Friday. Meant

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: extra pages Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:07:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks for asking -- yes everything went smoothly. Paul Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. C. :fa , is Subject: RE: extra pages No objection to the extra pages. I hope that all went well on Friday. ----Original Message-- From: Paul Cassell [mailto:cassellp©law.utah.edu] Sent: Sunday December 04 2011 1:55 PM Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: extra pages Sorry I had to leave the call early Friday. Meant to check with you on this then. I am working with Brad to finalize our pleadings to be filed on Monday in response to the motion to dismiss. We are filing an unsealed pleading (that does not discuss grand jury material) as well as a sealed pleading (that discusses only the grand jury material and related issues). The unseal pleading is 24 pages long and the sealed pleading is 7 pages long. We also have a response to the motion to stay which is well under the 20 page limit. Any objection to a motion for the extra pages (4 + 7, although Pm not sure whether we count the 7) to respond to your motion to dismiss? EFTA00207934 Thanks for your help on getting back to us. PC Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Conference call 11:15 AM Florida time - Friday Paul, We will take care of the arrangements for tomorrow at 11:15 a.m. Thanks. From: Paul Cassell mailto:cassellSlaw.utah.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 01 2011 4:59 PM Subject: RE: Conference call 11:15 AM Florida time - Friday Hi all, Does 11:15 AM Florida time on Friday work? If so, please call my cell phone as well as Brad - Ed/Dexter can y'all initiate the conference call or set up a call in number? Looking forward to chatting. PC Paul G. Cassell— Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein - conference call at 5 PM today? EFTA00207935 Hi everyone - Sony, I am having a very busy duty week. Tomorrow I have court at 9:00 probably until 11:00 and then again from 3:00 until 5:00. I have a debriefing at 1:00, but I should be able to step out after 1:30. So, 11:15 or 1:30 are best for me, but your schedules take priority. Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein - conference call at 5 PM today? Unfortunately, that doesn't work for us today. Can we set up a time for tomorrow? -----Original Message-- From: Paul Cassell [mailto:[email protected]]Vmailtolmailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:22 PM Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein - conference call at 5 PM today? Thanks for the call. Sony I was on the other line. Can we set up a time certain? That way Brad can participate. He is in a depo until 4:30, but should be free at 5 PM your time today (Thursday). Does that work? EFTA00207936 Looking forward to chatting. PC Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments • is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. -----Original Message-- From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:25 AM We will shortly be filing a motion to compel Government responses to our discovery requests — discovery which, as you know, Judge Marra has already ordered. We realize, of course, that the Government has filed a motion to dismiss/stay. But if the Government's position is rejected on those motions, then the next issue is what discovery can we expect to receive from the Government. If the motions are denied, will the Government voluntarily produce anything to us? Will the government at least agree to produce the following: EFTA00207937 (I) The Government's initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26; (2) Answers to all of the victims' requests for admission; (3) All documents, correspondence, and other information that the Government distributed to persons or entities outside of the federal Government or received from persons or entities outside of the federal government; and (4) All documents, correspondence, and other information covered by the victims' discovery request that is not subject to a claim of privilege. And, for all other information withheld, will the Government agree to produce a document-bydocument privilege log, as required by the local rules? Thanks for your help on these questions and Brad and I have. Sincerely, Paul Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe N2 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. EFTA00207938

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>

From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> To: Cc: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: extra pages Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:55:18 +0000 Importance: Normal Heys, and Ed, Sorry I had to leave the call early Friday. Meant to check with you on this then. I am working with Brad to finalize our pleadings to be filed on Monday in response to the motion to dismiss. We are filing an unsealed pleading (that does not discuss grand jury material) as well as a sealed pleading (that discusses only the grand jury material and related issues). The unseal pleading is 24 pages long and the sealed pleading is 7 pages long. We also have a response to the motion to stay which is well under the 20 page limit. Any objection to a motion for the extra pages (4 + 7, although I'm not sure whether we count the 7) to respond to your motion to dismiss? Thanks for your help on getting back to us. PC Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney Co

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell •ci

From: Paul Cassell •ci To: "IN (USAFLS)" ' Cc: , • (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" >, Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: ORDER-omnibus-wrapup.pdf [tried to send this earlier, but it may not have gone out] Dear We haven't seen the sealed order granting the Government's motion for stay either. (Have you?). But, in any event, Judge Marra's order on June 19, 2013 (DE 190) specifically stated that "The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the Government [DE 130] is GRANTED. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of entry of this order, the Government shall . . . [produce various discovery]." For your convenience, I attach a copy of DE 190 ordering the Government to produce discovery within 30 days. So we are expecting to see you produce the bulk of our discovery on July 19, 2013, as specifically directed in DE 190 which granted our mo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:49:44 +0000 Importance: Normal I am out of the office for the afternoon. Can you send Paul the log in Word format? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 01:22 PM Subject: RE: Word version of privilege log Would you be willing to extend us a small favor? It would be helpful if we had a Word / Wordperfect version (or native PDF version) of your two privilege logs, so that we can "cut and paste" responses etc. Would you be willing to provide that to us? Thanks in advance for any help you are willing to extend. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:03 AM Subject: RE: other victims Please see attached information about the victims' requests for production. If this allows the Government to provide us any more information, please let us know promptly. Thanks for your

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.