Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00209277DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00209277
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: ' To: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Draft Declaration for S/A Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:16:58 +0000 Importance: Normal - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 I United States and I do not specifically recall documenting mental health issues or any Baker-acts that may have occurred. I checked with Twiler and the Palm Beach County Victim Service referrals did not get copied to our file. BUT, that being said, we do have HIPAA issues. We have Medical Records for one of our victims to include billing and birth records. We also have Mr. Epstein's Treatment/Medical records from one or two of his Chiropractors. I would like the Declaration to include the verbiage you stated in your email to about the fact that if these victims statements are released that it would not just merely cause embarrassment but that it has and would continue to psychologically harm and disrupt the lives of these girls. and I feel very strongly about the effect this would have to many of victims. It was very

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Draft Declaration for S/A Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:16:58 +0000 Importance: Normal - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 I United States and I do not specifically recall documenting mental health issues or any Baker-acts that may have occurred. I checked with Twiler and the Palm Beach County Victim Service referrals did not get copied to our file. BUT, that being said, we do have HIPAA issues. We have Medical Records for one of our victims to include billing and birth records. We also have Mr. Epstein's Treatment/Medical records from one or two of his Chiropractors. I would like the Declaration to include the verbiage you stated in your email to about the fact that if these victims statements are released that it would not just merely cause embarrassment but that it has and would continue to psychologically harm and disrupt the lives of these girls. and I feel very strongly about the effect this would have to many of victims. It was very traumatic for many of these girls to relive and discuss what happen to them. Not to mention the media circus and how cruel some were to characterize and judge the victims. I have tried to reach you on several occasions by phone. Call me if you want further explanation or you have any questions. FBI Miami/PBCRA PH: FAX: From: (USAFLS) [mailto sent: Fricla Au ust 30, 2013 2:27 PM To: Subject: RE: Draft Declaration for S/A - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 1 United States Any time we asked about a victim's mental health or noted that she was Baker-acted or that we had talked to the counselor at Palm Beach County Victim Services it could be considered HIPAA material. We also obtained medical records for T.M. Any others? Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: [mailto Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:51 AM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: Re: Draft Declaration for S/A - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2I. United States EFTA00209277 I like your verbage but not sure what 302s or info in case file is HIPPA. I haven't reviewed in awhile and could u refresh my memory. From: To: I (USAFLS); Cc: Sent: Fri Aug 30 11:13:05 2013 Subject: RE: Draft Declaration for S/A R. (MM)(FBI) - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2I. United States You may also want to add that the 302's and the file include information covered by HIPAA and that the disclosure of this information in these types of cases doesn't merely cause "embarassment," it can cause psychological harm, disruption of family relationships, disruption of professional careers, etc. We had victims who threatened suicide during the investigation and part of our job was seeking counseling for those girls in need. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: U, (USAFLS) Sent: Frida Au ust 30 2013 11:03 AM To: (USAFLS); (FBI); =., R. (MM)(FBI) Cc: (FBI) Subject: Draft Declaration for S/A - Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2I. United States Colleagues, I have prepared a draft declaration for review by S/A I want to establish that Operation Leap Year is an open investigation, and the embarrassment that would be suffered by the victims should their FBI 302's be disclosed to third parties. I ask you views on whether the declaration can be filed publicly. Please feel free to make any corrections. Our responses to the victims' objections to our privilege claims are due on Tuesday, September 3, 2013. Thanks for your assistance. Have an enjoyable Labor Day weekend. « File: >> EFTA00209278

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 49

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 03'21'2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION TO HAVE THEIR FACTS ACCEPTED BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FAILURE TO CONTEST ANY OF THE FACTS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to accept all of their facts in their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The victims have been attempting to negotiate with the Government for more than 30 months on a stipulated set of facts. Despite repeated opportunities to advise the victims of what facts they are contesting, the Government in the last few days has flatly declared that it will not discuss the facts in this case. This is violation of the Court's direction to the parties as well as the local rule on

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.