To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>
Summary
To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> <Dexter.Lee usduj.gov>, "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:44:53 +0000 Importance: Normal I assume this e-mail was forwarded to me by mistake. I would appreciate being taken off the list of recipients of these communications. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> uate: UM-T/26n 02:21 PM Subject: RE:MTO in the Eleventh Circuit Brad and I are preparing to file today in the Eleventh Circuit a motion to dismiss Epstein's frivolous interlocutory appeal, for reasons outline in our opposition to his motion to stay. What is your position on this motion? We understand you are conferring with Washington DO), and hope that they will agree that expansion of the Perlman doctrine is clearly not in the Government's interest. Thanks for providing us whatever information you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell
Persons Referenced (6)
“...09383 rad Edwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell u : rropasea order,.Jane Does United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules...”
United States“...Edwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell u : rropasea order,.Jane Does United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached plea...”
Jane Doe #1Jane Doe #2“... you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message S along vnth any/all attachments is confidential. This message is int...”
Paul CassellTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
From: la,
From: la, (USAFLS)" To: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: VR materials Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:56:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Yes. Shall we schedule it for 4:30 p.m.? Thanks. From: . I. (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:40 AM To: M, (USAFLS) Subject: RE: VR materials — Do we need a call-in number? I don't think we can conference call all of these numbers. Thanks. From: IIM, (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda Ma 20 2014 9:59 PM To: Cc: ; M I. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: VR materials Thanks. Please excuse my typographical error. Tomorrow is May 21. From: Brad Edwards fmailto. Sent: Tuesda May 20, 2014 09:54 PM To: USAFLS Cc: Subject: Re: VR materials >; (USAF'S) After 4:00 I can be reached on my cell. Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2014, at 9:44 PM, "MI, (USAFLS)" < > wrote: Paul and Brad, Are you available for a conference call tomorrow, May 22, after 3:00 pm, Eastern time? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell (mailto: Sent: Tuesda May 20, 2014 12:54 PM To: USAFLS); Brad Edw
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Subjec
Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message
From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>
From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> To Villafana(%.usdoj.gov>, Cc 'Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:21:18 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and I are preparing to file today in the Eleventh Circuit a motion to dismiss Epstein's frivolous interlocutory appeal, for reasons outline in our opposition to his motion to stay. What is your position on this motion? We understand you are conferring with Washington DO), and hope that they will agree that expansion of the Perlman doctrine is clearly not in the Government's interest. Thanks for providing us whatever information you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.). Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:37 PM ofainslibminliallilSolirad Edwards ([email protected]
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.