Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05)04.2009
Page 1 of 27
JANE DOE No. 102,
Plaintiff,
VS.
Civil Action No
09-80656
ClV-RYSKAMP
VITUNAC
I
FILED by iti 3
D C
INTAKE
MAY - 12009
STEVEN M. 6ARIMORE
J.
C A
COMPLAINT AND
Defendant.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
and states as follows:
1.
At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a
resident of Palm Beach County, Florida.
2.
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault
and abuse of a then minor.
3.
At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstcin, had a
residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
4.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the State of Florida, as he is
currently incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Stockade.
5.
At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an
adult male born in 1953.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210921
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 2 of 27
6.
This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
7.
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a
substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
8.
At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, spanning the
ages of 45 and 55 years old. Epstein is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with
a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power,
and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a
Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration, he maintained his
principal place of residence in the largest home in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story
mansion on the Upper East Side. Upon information and belief, he also owns a $6.8 million
mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named
"Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, a
mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and a home in the Avenue Foch area of Paris.
The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish homes and/or numerous
other locations both nationally and internationally.
9.
Upon information and belief, Defendant has a sexual preference for underage
minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless
vulnerable and relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted,
molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money.
10.
Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant
used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern
of sexually exploitative behavior.
Podhurst Orsecic P.A.
EFTA00210922
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 3 of 27
II.
Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method.
Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less
fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon
them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to
recruit other underage girls. Upon information and belief, Defendant and/or an authorized agent
would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach
residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West
Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who
Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have
credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and
other minor girls, some as young as 12 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach
mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with
"massages."
12.
Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were
perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped
him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would often arrange times for
underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of
underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where
Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove
their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the
conclusion of each "massage appointment," and, upon information and belief, take nude
photographs and/or videos of the underage girls for Defendant with and/or without their
knowledge. Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars.
3
Podhurst Orseck, PA.
EFTA00210923
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05)04.2009
Page 4 of 27
13.
Epstein designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach
mansion where only persons employed and invited by Epstein would be present, so as to reduce
the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more
difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law
enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employees, agents,
and/or assistants or by a taxicab paid for by Defendant in order to make it difficult for the girls to
flee his mansion.
14.
Upon arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would
generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal
contact information. The minor girl would then be led up a flight of stairs to a room that
contained a massage table and a large shower. The staircase leading to the room was plastered
with nude photographs of young girls, including some photographs depicting two or more young
girls engaged in lewd acts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had such
photographs in each of his six homes and/or on his computers.
15.
At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would
be in the room to "lead the way" until Defendant would have her leave. Generally, Defendant
would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed.
Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl
specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove
her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including
fondling the minor's
touching the minor's
performing
and/or
coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or prostitution and/or
4
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210924
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05:04:2009
Page 5 of 27
enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's
presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations
took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts
regularly on a daily basis and, in most Stances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the
daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily
available.
16.
Defendant, Epstein, traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of
luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to
contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable
himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he
conspired with others, including assistants and/or his driver(s) and/or pilot(s), and his socialite
friend/partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to further these acts and to avoid police detection.
Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior referred to in paragraph 10 and
described in paragraphs 11 through the present paragraph occurred in all of Defendant's
domestic and international residences and/or places of lodging and/or modes of transportation.
17.
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money,
wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff.
A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was working as a changing room assistant at The Mar-A-Lago
Club in Palm Beach making approximately S9 an hour when she was first lured into Defendant's
sexually exploitative world. In or about the summer of 1998, when Plaintiff was merely fifteen
years old while attending to her duties at Mar-A-Lago, Plaintiff was recruited by Ghislaine
Maxwell, who lived, traveled, socialized, and worked with Defendant. Ms. Maxwell asked
Plaintiff if she was interested in learning massage therapy and earning a great deal of money
while learning the profession. Plaintiff's father, who was a maintenance manager at The Mar-A-
5
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210925
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 6 of 27
Lago Club, was not apprehensive because he felt comforted that an older woman had approached
Plaintiff with this opportunity. As a result, Plaintiffs father dropped off Plaintiff at Defendant's
mansion that same day. Ms. Maxwell met Plaintiff and her father outside of Defendant's Palm
Beach mansion, where Ms. Maxwell assured the minor girl's father that Ms. Maxwell would
provide transportation home for his teenaged daughter. Ghislaine Maxwell led Plaintiff up a
flight of stairs to a spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant was lying naked on
the massage table. Plaintiff was shocked, but, with no experience with massages, thought this
could be massage therapy protocol. Ms. Maxwell then took off her own shirt and left on her
underwear and started rubbing her breasts across Defendant's body, impliedly showing Plaintiff
what she was expected to do. Ms. Maxwell then told Plaintiff to take off her clothes. The minor
girl was apprehensive about doing this, but, in fear, proceeded to follow Ms. Maxwell by
removing everything but her underwear. She was then ordered to remove her underwear and to
straddle Defendant.
The encounter escalated, with Defendant and Ms. Maxwell sexually
assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff in various ways and in various locations,
including the steam room and shower. At the end of this sexually exploitive abuse, Defendant
and Ms. Maxwell giddily told Plaintiff to return the following day and told her she had "lots of
potential." Defendant paid Plaintiff hundreds of dollars, told her it was for two hours of work,
and directed one of his employees to drive her home.
18.
Defendant and/or his procurers thereafter lured the then minor Plaintiff to his
Palm Beach mansion every day for the next two weeks in order to engage in a similar pattern of
sexual exploitation. Defendant and/or his procurers arranged at the end of each incident the
transportation and scheduling for the following day's appointment. Additionally, Defendant
telephoned the minor Plaintiff himself and/or had Ms. Maxwell telephone Plaintiff to make
arrangements.
Plaintiff was often times driven to and from Epstein's mansion by Epstein
6
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210926
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 7 of 27
himself or his driver. Alternatively, Defendant or Ms. Maxwell would arrange and pay for
Plaintiff's transportation home by taxicab.
19.
During Plaintiff's second incident of being sexually exploited and assaulted by
Defendant at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, Defendant asked Plaintiff to quit her job at The
Mar-A-Lago Club and travel with him to earn much more money while learning the massage
profession. Thus, Plaintiff, an impressionable and vulnerable young girl of modest means, quit
her job as a changing room assistant, was lured by Defendant, and continued to be victimized by
Defendant, who immersed the minor Plaintiff into Defendant's lewd and abusive lifestyle.
Under Defendant's dominion and control, Defendant continuously "groomed" the minor
adolescent. Defendant's daily routine required the minor Plaintiff to perform sexually on
Defendant multiple times per day and to provide Defendant massages multiple times per day.
Plaintiff had absolutely no say as to when, how many times, or what was done during each
sexual encounter. Often, Plaintiff was joined by Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Maxwell's assistant, and/or a
countless array of young women who would be brought to one of Defendant's homes for the
sexual trysts and then be sexually exploited by Defendant.
20.
The first time that Defendant transported Plaintiff to another state in order to
engage in sexual acts with her occurred when she was merely fifteen years old and after only two
weeks of daily sexually abusive encounters with Defendant. Defendant used his private jet to
transport the minor Plaintiff to Manhattan, where he provided her with spending money and
accommodations with him at his mansion. From the time that Plaintiff was 15 years old,
Defendant abused her to serve his every sexual whim, obtaining and purchasing passports and
whatever was needed for her to travel with him and/or for him. Defendant transported Plaintiff
in his private jet to locations that included Palm Beach, New York City, Santa Fe, Los Angeles,
San Francisco, St. Louis, and numerous other domestic destinations, as well as international
7
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210927
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 8 of 27
destinations, including Europe, the Caribbean, and Africa. He provided accommodations with
him in order to have her available to him at all times wherever he went, including while
transporting the minor Plaintiff on his private jet. Each time they would travel to one of these
destinations, the same pattern of sexual abuse would occur, often with a vast array of aspiring
models, actresses, celebrities, and/or other females, including minors, from all over the world.
Upon information and belief, Defendant transported minor girls from Turkey, the Czech
Republic, Asia, and numerous other countries, many of whom spoke no English. To Plaintiff's
knowledge, the only females specifically excluded front Defendant's sexual escapades were
African-Americans.
21.
In addition to being continually exploited to satisfy Defendant's every sexual
whim, Plaintiff was also required to be sexually exploited by Defendant's adult male peers,
including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal
acquaintances. Whenever Defendant transported Plaintiff with him in his private jet to any
destination, Defendant would pay Plaintiff a flat rate per day while he and/or his above-
mentioned associates would sexually exploit and abuse minor Plaintiff.
22.
Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when Defendant knew that
Plaintiff was approximately 15, 16, and 17 years old, and, after years of daily sexual exploitation,
continued into her adulthood. Despite Defendant's stating shortly before Plaintiff's sixteenth
birthday that he soon would have to trade her in because she was getting too old, Defendant
continued to sexually exploit Plaintiff until she fled at age 19. Defendant's predilection for
young girls was well known to those who regularly procured them for him and to his circle of
friends. On one of Defendant's birthdays, a friend of Defendant sent him three 12-year-old girls
from France who spoke no English for Defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so,
they were sent back to France the next thy.
8
Podhurst &Neck P A
EFTA00210928
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 9 of 27
23.
Any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor
Plaintiff are belied by his own actions, and are rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable
federal statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein. at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of
Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant and Ms. Maxwell acknowledged and celebrated Plaintiff's
16th birthday. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly
procured them for him.
24.
As previously stated in paragraph 14, Defendant displayed nude photographs of
underage girls throughout his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of
Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm
Beach. When she asked Defendant about it, he stated dismissively that he had naked photographs
of her in all of his homes.
25.
Upon information and belief, some of the photographs in Defendant's possession
were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest,
police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in
Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant may have taken lewd photographs
of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd
photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using
a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. In addition, while Plaintiff was a
minor teenager and upon Ms. Maxwell's insistence after Ms. Maxwell rejected as inappropriate
photographs that Plaintiff presented of herself fully clothed, Ms. Maxwell photographed Plaintiff
naked in different sexually explicit positions.
Ms. Maxwell then presented these nude
photographs of Plaintiff to Defendant as a birthday present for Defendant from Ms. Maxwell.
9
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210929
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 10 of 27
Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when
she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a
search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information
and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement.
26.
It is virtually impossible to calculate the exact number of times that Defendant
sexually exploited and abused Plaintiff. From the age of 15, Plaintiff was sexually exploited and
abused by Defendant on a daily basis and, most often, multiple times each day. While some of
the precise dates these acts occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known to
Defendant, as he is reported to have kept a written log of each instance in which he engaged in
these lewd acts with then minor Plaintiff and others. Upon information and belief, these logs are
also in the custody of law enforcement.
27.
In or around September 2002, Defendant purchased a commercial round-trip
airline ticket, and provided a passport, U.S. currency, and accommodations for Plaintiff to fly to
Thailand. While thousands of miles away from Defendant on this extended trip alone for the
first time in more than four years, Plaintiff met, fell in love, and married a young man. She
escaped from Defendant's abuse with the help and insistence of her new husband and, instead of
returning to Defendant, boarded a plane to Australia with one suitcase.
28.
Since November 2002, Plaintiff has lived a modest life in Australia, while
maintaining lines of communication with her family and without contact with Defendant or any
of the people in his entourage. However, suddenly, in 2008, Plaintiff received numerous phone
calls from one of Defendant's agents. During these phone calls to Plaintiff, he repeatedly asked
whether she knew anything about the civil cases against Defendant, whether she knew any of the
females who were proceeding with the civil suits, whether she was planning on filing suit,
whether she was communicating and/or cooperating with anyone against Defendant, and whether
10
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210930
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 11 of 27
she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to
track her down on her changed cell phone number halfway across the world, Plaintiff attempted
to reassure Defendant's agent that she would remain quiet. During the course of one of these
phone calls from Defendant's agents, Defendant himself spoke on the phone, continued to
question her intentions, and, upon being reassured by Plaintiff, thanked her for not getting
involved.
29.
Around January 2009, Plaintiff received a letter from the United States Attorney's
Office for the Southern District of Florida, informing her of her potential civil claims against
Defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Plaintiff contacted undersigned counsel within days and
diligently and repeatedly pursued a good faith viable settlement of her claims against Defendant.
Unable to reach a settlement, this lawsuit followed.
30.
As a result of these encounters with Defendant, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, has in
the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering,
emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation,
confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity,
invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with
Defendant's controlling and manipulating her on a daily basis for years into a perverse and
unhealthy way of life.
31.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed the above-referenced acts upon Plaintiff in
violation of federal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in
prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex
trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a
minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, transport of child pornography, child exploitation
enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated
11
Podhurst Orseck, P A.
EFTA00210931
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 12 of 27
in 18 U.S.C. § 2421, § 2422(a), § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), § 2423(e), § 2251, § 2252, §
2252A(a)(1), and § 2252A(gX1).
32.
In June 2008, after investigations by the Palm Beach Police Department, the Palm
Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas
of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and
the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in
Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is in the same position as if he had
been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against Plaintiff and, as such, must
admit liability unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102. Plaintiff hereby exclusively seeks civil remedies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
COUNT ONE
(Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Enzaze in Prostitution or
Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(b))
33.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
34.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign
commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Jane Doe No. 102, when she was
under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person
can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).
35.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
12
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210932
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 13 of 27
36.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT TWO
(Cause of Action for Transportation of Minor with Intent to Encase in Criminal Sexual
Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2423(a))
37.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above.
38.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported then minor Plaintiff, Jane Doe
No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in
prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
offense, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27.
13
Podhurst Orseck, P A
EFTA00210933
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 14 of 27
Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international
borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood
with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her.
39.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
40.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff
incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional
medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the
capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are
permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jut), on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
14
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210934
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05'04:2009
Page 15 of 27
COUNT THREE
(Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Eneape in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant to 18
U.S.C.6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2423(b))
41.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
42.
Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, traveled in interstate
and/or foreign commerce with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18
U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 2423(b).
43.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
44.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
income in the figure, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
15
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210935
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 16 of 27
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT FOUR
(Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement to Ens& in Prostitution or Sexual Activity
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(a)1
45.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above.
46.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, and/or
coerced Jane Doe No. 102 to travel in interstate and/or foreign commerce to engage in
prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense,
or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a).
47.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
48.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress.
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
16
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210936
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05(0412009
Page 17 of 27
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff; Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by juty on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT FIVE
(Cause of Action for Transportation with Intent to Enzaze in Criminal Sexual Activity
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 24211
49.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
50.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported, or attempted to transport,
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff
engage in prostitution and/or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a
criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421. As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21,
and 27, Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across
international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 yews old
through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her.
51.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
52.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
17
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210937
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 18 of 27
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff
incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional
medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the
capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are
permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT SIX
1Cause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in
Violation of 18 U.S.C.$ 22511
53.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
54.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the
then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual
depiction of such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251. As previously stated in paragraphs
14, 24, and 25, Defendant kept and displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls
throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each
of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm
18
Podhurst Orsedc, P.A.
EFTA00210938
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 19 of 27
Beach. Upon information and belief many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant
were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest,
police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in
Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken
lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have
transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and
elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information
and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were
confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of
Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those
photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement.
55.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
56.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
19
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
1
EFTA00210939
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05(04'2009
Page 20 of 27
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT SEVEN
(Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Enzaaing in Sexually Explicit
Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252(a)(1)1
57.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
58.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via
computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual
depiction of the minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
2252(a)(1). As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, Defendant displayed a myriad of
nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York
City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw
photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of
herself naked as a minor at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. As previously stated in paragraph
24, Defendant told Plaintiff that he had photographs of her naked in all of his homes. Upon
information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with
hidden cameras set up throughout his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police
found two hidden cameras and nude photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's
home.
Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd
20
Podhurst Orseck, P A.
EFTA00210940
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 21 of 27
photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported
lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere
using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief,
one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were
confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of
Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those
photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement.
59.
As previously stated in paragraph 23, any assertions by Defendant that he was
unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by
the provision of applicable federal and state statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse
of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew
and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant's preference for underage girls
was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him.
60.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
61.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
21
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
1
EFTA00210941
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 22 of 27
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant.
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT EIGHT
(Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornoeraphv pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in
Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 22S2Aralint
62.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
63.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via
computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(1).
64.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
65.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
22
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210942
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 23 of 27
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
COUNT NINE
(Cause of Action for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252A(e))
66.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by
reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above and Counts One through
Eight above.
67.
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise,
as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX1). As more fully
set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. §
1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 2251, 2252(a)(1), and 2252(AXaX1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal
sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, and 2423). As more fully set forth above
in paragraphs 9 through 32, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless
separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in
concert with at least three other persons.
23
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210943
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 24 of 27
68.
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in
18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
69.
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered,
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy,
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and
leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation,
actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as
this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right
by a jury.
ktta
_12
Ka E
Robert C. JosefsWerg, Bar No. 0408563
Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, Florida 33130
(305) 358-2800
(305) 358-2382 (fax)
riosefsbergApodhurst.com
24
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210944
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05(04:2009
Page 25 of 27
kezell@podhurst.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Plaintiff demands to have her case tried before a jury.
866A LAy-4.44-r kr
kIC'
Robert C. Josettherg, Bar No. 040856
Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771
Podhurst Orsecic, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, Florida 33130
(305) 358-2800
(305) 358-2382 (fax)
rjosefsberg .podhurst.com
kezellapodhurst.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
25
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
EFTA00210945
.
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 26 of 27
NOS 44 (Rm. 1105)
The JS 44 civil cover shod and the information contained herein neither replace nor SOPPleMalt the filing and service of pleadings or other papasas required by law, except as provided
by load rules of mud. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for the use of the Cat of Court for the purpose of initiating
the civil docket shed. (SEE. INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate AD Re-filed Cases Below.
1. (a) PLAINTIFFS
Jane Doe No. 102
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
West Palm Beach
(EXCEPT IN US. PLAINTIFF CASES)
(e) Attorntylt (him Name. Adtress. and Telephorc Number)
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800
Miami FI
oq-
- 80(05 -
Id) Check County Where Action Arosc: 1 M IAM I I) Slit
I MIN ROE. 6 4.
•
tio?)1,
D
PALM BEACH
DEFENDANTS
Jeffrey Epstein
County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
West Palm Beach
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CATPQ OnLYI
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION C/441,60119, so
iQIIR
LAND INVOLVED.
I `WAKE.
4tArr
I
I
1Cnount)
i
MAY
1 2009
1
0
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., AtterburX Gold
ger, et al., 250 S. I
Australian Ave., #1400, West Palm'Beatths.FEN31340.11011.obett D. is
0 MARTIN O ST. LUCIE
3 INDISIOILHEIELRI LIMMCIICkg
CLEF"( a ' S. Csts'T
HIGHLANDS
(Place an IC in One Box Only1
Cl I
US. Lantana
/7 3 Federal Quedka
Plaintiff
(US. Cowman Not a Party)
0 2 U.S. liacnunent
0 4
Diversity
Defendant
(Indicate Covens/up of Plirnel in hem Ill)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES:risss arr MOM Box for Plair4iff
ffor Diversity Cara Ocly)
and One Boa for DeRriclars0
PTE
Cilia-nor This State
7
I
Citizen of. nother State
0
2
Citizen or Subject of a
0
3
Forei
Country
DEE
PTF
DEF
t
Incorporated or Principal Flax
of Business In This Stale
1
4
O 4
O 2
Incorporated and Pink:oat Place
of BUSITC13 In Another State
O
5
0
5
0
3
Foreign Nation
0
6
0 6
I
cdIlial
TO
BANKRUPTCY
OTHER s-rAints
I
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Milk, Act
140 Nepotist* instrument
150 Recovery of Os anayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicate Act
152 Recovery of Dcfaubcd
Student Leans
(Excl. Veterans)
0 153 Recovery of Ovapiameat
of Veterans &oaks
0 160 Siockholders' Suits
0 190 Other Contract
0 195 Comma Product Liability
O 196 Emnehise
PERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
0 310 Milan
0
362 Personal Injury •
0 315 Aiffilane Product
Ma Malpractice
Liability
O 365 Personal Injury-
0 320 Astault. Ltd @
Product Liability
Slander
O
368 Ashestiza Personal
1 DO Federal Employers*
Injury ProSuci
Liability
Liability
0 340 Marine
0 345 Marine Product
1
370 Other Saud
LIMED
0
171 That in Ladies
0 350 Motor Vehicle
0
MO Other Personal
O 355 Motor Vehicle
Property Damage
Ptoduct liability
Cl
385 Pmpeny Denude
8 360 Other Perscal
Product liability
Injury
0
610 Agriculture
0
620 Other Food & Drug
3
623 Drug Related Mame
of Property 21 USC MI
0 630 Liquor Lens
Cl 610 R R. & Truck
0 630 Mane Rep.
0 660 Occupational
SafayiHealth
3 690 Other
0 422 Appeal 28 USC 158
il 423 Withdrithil
28 USC 137
400 Slate ReaPPollicfacellt
410 Ammo
430 Banks and Mankind
430 Continent
460 Detonation
470 Racketeer Influenced and
Comp Organizations
480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
810 Selective Service
830 SeanitiesiCorarnodines.
Exchange
873 Custom Challenge
12 USC 3410
890 Other Statutory Actions
891 Agrieultund Ads
892 Economic Subilirmion Act
893 Emirontnental !damn
894 loan Allocation An
893 Freedom of [animation
Act
91)0Appeal of Eve Dffenntration
Under Equal ACcess
toJustice
0 MO Coanitunornlity of
State Smiths
MI a :fil . Ka a:ICH:IC
3 F20 Copyriptuts
1 830 Patna
r) 840 Todeniark
LABOR
SOCIAL SECURITY
0
710 lair Labor Sander&
Ad
0
720 LabooMgras Reheats
0
730 LaborthIgni.Reporting
dt Diatom= Aar
0
740 Railway Libor Act
O 790Oilter Lake Litiggioe
0
791 Encl. Ret. Inc.
Scarily Act
1861111A 1139510
0 862 Black Lung (923)
0 863 DINX1DIWW NOS(®
0 864 SSID Title XVI
0 865 RSI (405(0)
I
REAL PROPERTY
CIVIL RIGHTS
O 870 fates (DS. Plaintiff
or Defendant,
O 871 IRS— fItird Pany
26 USC 7609
0 210 Land Condrinnaam
0 220 ForecIosure
0 230 Rem Lae & E,CcIIIICI.
O 240 Tons to 1 and
O 245 Ton Product Lability
O 290 All Other Real Property
0 441 Voting
Cl 442 Employment
0 443 Dousing'
Accommodations
0 444 Welfare
3 443 Artier. wOnabilities .
Repayment
3 446 AMT. *tifibilitiCS •
Other
3 440 Other Civil Rights
1
510 Simian to li'acage
Manx
Habeas Corpus:
1
510 Gan)
I
MS Death Penalty
1
540 Mandamus & Other
0
550 Civil Rights
0
555 Pate Condition
V. ORIGIN
vi 1 rul
ing
Waco a 'X" imOne Ha Only)
Transferred from
O 2 Removal from
n
3
Ro-fded-
O 4 Reiman:dm Cl 5 anotherdistaiet
O 6 M916district
St to Court
ate VI below)
Reopened
Dina y)
litigation
Appeal to District
CI
idge from
'
Magistrate
lodgment
CASE(S).
(See atrouctions
letabl
a) Re-filed Case OYES 0 NO
JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra
b) Related Cases GIYES O NO
DCICKET See Attached
NUMBER
VII. CAUSE OF
ACTION
Cie the U.S. (
Mange under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do Dot cite jurisdklIonal statutes unless
dIvenhy):
18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b), 2423(b), 2423(e), 2251, 2252, 2252A(a)( 1), 2252A(g)( I)
LENGM OF TRIAL nth 4
days estimated (for both sides to try tine ease)
UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
COMPLAINT:
DEMANDS
CHECK YES only if demanded 'n complaint:
JURY DEMAND: is Yes ri
No
SIG.
TURE 01:ATTORNEY tr7( 0
DATE 5) I) 9
R °MOE USE ON.I.So
AMOIJN4 tce.
)
RECEIPT/ rinal
14.3(7
EFTA00210946
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009
Page 27 of 27
FOR: Jane Doe 10Lv. Jeffrey Epstein
VI:
08-80069
08-80119
08-80232
08-80380
08-80381
08-08804
08-80811
08-80893
08-80993
08-80994
08-80469
09-80591
EFTA00210947