Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211498DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211498
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:33:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2016.04.05_Ltr to_ df Inline-Images: image001.jpg This attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell called me and I picked up the call without knowing who it was. She asked me a series of questions which she claims that she wants to use in the civil suit between Ms. Maxwell and' ;. I have attached her "confirming letter," which doesn't exactly capture what I said to her. I have no desire to be part of that suit and know nothing about it, but I also don't want her misrepresenting what I said. Any thoughts or advice? I thought about something like: Dear Ms. Menninger: I am in receipt of your letter of April 6, 2016, where you have attempted to memorialize our telephone conversation. The United States and the U.S. Attorney's Office are not parties to your suit and I am unaware of the representations that you discuss beyond what you have told me. To clarify, due to pending litigation, th

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:33:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2016.04.05_Ltr to_ df Inline-Images: image001.jpg This attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell called me and I picked up the call without knowing who it was. She asked me a series of questions which she claims that she wants to use in the civil suit between Ms. Maxwell and' ;. I have attached her "confirming letter," which doesn't exactly capture what I said to her. I have no desire to be part of that suit and know nothing about it, but I also don't want her misrepresenting what I said. Any thoughts or advice? I thought about something like: Dear Ms. Menninger: I am in receipt of your letter of April 6, 2016, where you have attempted to memorialize our telephone conversation. The United States and the U.S. Attorney's Office are not parties to your suit and I am unaware of the representations that you discuss beyond what you have told me. To clarify, due to pending litigation, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida has been conflicted off of any investigations related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Thus, this Office does not have a pending investigation of Ms. Maxwell. I am personally unaware of any pending criminal investigation of Ms. Maxwell by any other authority. The Non-Prosecution Agreement has been made public in other suits and the document does not mention Ms. Maxwell by name. I am running off to the ()LEDs, but maybe we can discuss tomorrow? From: Laura Menninger [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 4:11 PM Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell Ms. Villafana — Please see attached correspondence. Best regards, Laura EFTA00211498 CONFIDEN ents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, o cipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving it in any manner. Thank you. EFTA00211499

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio I. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 October 20, 2020 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Christian Everdell, Esq. Mark Cohen, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 33 West 19th Street-4th Fl. New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: In recognition of the Government's ongoing discovery obligations, today we are producing copies of the materials listed in the below index, which materials are stamped with control numbers SDNY_GM_00328070 through SDNY_GM_00356148. The password for the drive is "USAOsdnyl!". The materials are available for pickup at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan. Please note that both this l

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Pagel of 38

Case 20-2413. Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Pagel of 38 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT Docket Number(s): 20-2413 Caption [use short till Motion for. Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Appeal Set forth below precise, compkte statement of relief sought: Ms. Maxwell seeks a stay pending appeal, or in the alternative, a temporary administrative stay to afford this Court sufficient time to consider on the merits the motion to stay pending appeal v. Maxwell MOVING PARTY: Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff-Appellee 9PlaintifT attendant EiAppellant/Petkioner DAppellet/Respondent MOVING ATTORNEY: Adam Mueller [name of attorney, with fon, address, phone number and e-mail) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP OPPOSING ATTORNEY: Sigrid McCawley Court- Judge/ Agency appealed from: Hon.

38p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of

8p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP .,:m.cohengesser <cm October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceed

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

ANnW COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear ..,-:,w.cohengessercom We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.