Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01077421DOJ Data Set 9Other

BURMAN. CRITTON

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01077421
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEM_AN,LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP J. MICHAEL BURMAN. P.A.' ADELQUI J. BENAYENTE GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA PARALEGALtINVESTICATOR ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR. PA I JESSICA CADWELL BERNARD A. LEIEDEKER BOBBIE M. MCKENNA DANIEL LUSTIG ASHUE STOKEN•BARING MARK T. LUITIER. P.A. BETTY STOKES MICHAEL I. PIKE PARALEGALS MICHAEL I.. SCHEVE RITA H. BUDNYK DEAN t XENICK Of COUNSEL DAVID A YAREMA EDWARD M. RICCI March 29, 2011 Of COUNSEL I TEDIUM BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER (ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO Sent by E-Mail Only Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett, P.A. Phillips Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein et al. Dear Joe: I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Vogeler's demand letter dated March 23, 2011 and my letter to him. I am forwarding a copy of this letter to Jeffrey and Marty Weinberg. Should anyone else need a copy, I will assume that you will forward it to them. I recommend that you contact Mr. Vogeler directly if you want an extension. It seems to me this letter is a shake down/extortion Good Luck. Cordially yo Robe D. Critton, Jr. RDC/clz Enclosures cc: Jeffrey Epstein Martin Weinberg, Esq. 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33401 • PHONE: 561-842-2820 • FAX: 561-84.6929 • MAILMICLCIAW.COM WWW.BCLCLAW.COM EFTA01077421 J. MICHAEL BURMAN, PALI GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. P.A. ' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER DANIEL LUSTIG MARK T. LUTTIER PA MICHAEL) PIKE MICHAEL L SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A. YAREMA If VAUD,. IOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMITTED TO PR/CrICE IN FLORIDA AND COLCRIADO BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN. us YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP March 29, 2011 Sent by Fax anc alail William K. Vogeler, Esq. Gruenbeck Vogeler 9110 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, California 92618 Re: Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein et al. ADELEWI J. BENAVENTE PALLALEGAL/INVES11GATOk JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA H. BUDNYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RiCCI 00 COUNSEL Dear Mr. Vogeler: I received your March 23, 2011 letter on March 28. I know you have a demand deadline of April 1st. I no longer represent Mr. Epstein nor have I since approximately August of 2010. I am, however, forwarding the letter to the appropriate attorneys for Mr. Epstein today and would ask that you grant them an additional ten (10) days within which to respond to your demand. Thank you for your anticipated courtesy. Cordially yo Robert P Critton, Jr. RDC/clz Cc: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Fowler White Burnett, P.A. 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 • PHONE: 561-842-2820 • FAX: 561-844-6929 • FoLAIL€8cLaAw.con4 WWW. BC LC LAW.COM EFTA01077422 A LAW PARTNERSHIP March 23, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION Robert D. Critton, Jr. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re. Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein et al Dear Mr. Critton: I am writing in an attempt to settle my client's claims against your client Jeffrey Epstein. According to my client, Mr. Epstein offered to pay her and other exotic dancers $10,000 each to perform at your client's home several years ago. A popular dancer at Rachel's Strip Club, my client was chauffered to a party at 358 El Brillo Way in West Palm Beach in early 2006. During the party, my client observed other young women dressed provocatively. Some appeared to be as young as 14 years old. My client was directed to an upstairs bedroom, where she saw Mr. Epstein. She recognized him because she had danced for him at the club before. At his home, Mr. Epstein introduced my client to his guest Prince Andrew. My client then danced for the men, undressing until she was wearing only a bra and panties. Mr. Epstein and Prince Andrew then told my client they wanted to have a threesome. She said she was hired to dance, not to have sex. Mr. Epstein said they would pay her later for dancing, and they prevailed upon her to engage in various sex acts. After the men had satisfied themselves, they invted my client to take a trip with them to the Virgin Islands. She declined their invitation. She was then chauffered back to the strip club. To date, your client has paid my client $2,000 of the promised $10,000. My client has not pursued her claims against your client until this time because she is not proud of the circumstances of that night. She was working as an exotic dancer, but she was treated like a prostitute. To avoid unseemly publicity, my client has asked me to keep her name confidential for purposes of settlement. However, she is prepared to asset her rights in the public courts if necessary. THE IRVINE SPECTRUM 91 10 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE IRVINE. CA PHONE: FAX: WWW.GRUENBECKVOGELER.COM EFTA01077423 Based upon my review of the facts and the law, I believe my client has claims for breach of an oral contract, quantum meruit and various torts. While the statute of limitations apparently has run on tort claims such as fraud, false imprisonment, or sexual assault — and the defense of consent may ultmately prevail against such torts -- the statute on an oral contract is four years. In this case, Mr. Epstein did not specify when they would pay for my client's services. In the absence of a specific date for performance, I hereby make a demand for payment at this time. Please be advised that my client has not agreed to keep confidential her interactions with your client in this regard. Moreover, a confidentiality agreement would not be enforceable to prevent her from being compelled as a witness in any other case. With these considerations, my client will agree to keep confidential her interactions with your client in exchange for a payment of $250,000. Naturally, this confidentiality agreement would extend to my client's interactions with Prince Andrew as well. Accordingly, my client's demand to settle this matter confidentiality is $250,000. This offer shall remain open until April 1, 2011. I look forward to your timely response. William K. Vogel EFTA01077424

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainlaw.com
Domainmailmiclciaw.com
Domainwww.bclclaw.com
Domainwww.gruenbeckvogeler.com
FaxFAX: 561-844-6929
Phone561-842-2820
Phone561-844-6929

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297437

Gratitude America - Google Search Page 1 of 1 403/, GrablUde IntoCa ck Alf Nen fl eas %know Maca atre 8-1linaS TWA, ;mow 44 300.033.4,6Sn 4031 SKWast GratitudeAmerica www.orasiudeamenetwei HONORING OUR. HEROES 'tannin Ow goner dew Reba. Restore. Recreate Reruns DotterteAppty lot a Reheat GratitudoAmetrices wassmn to 10 pomride Retreats Leadership Reba. Reface. & Reesman Out *Vets dem* a supoorton Van mutts Item gratiluleamened org • GratitudeAmerica. Inc - Home j Facebook

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein, Billionaire Pedophile, Goes Free - The Daily Beast

Jeffrey Epstein, Billionaire Pedophile, Goes Free - The Daily Beast Page 1 of 4 THE DAILY BEAST READ THIS SKIP THAT BLOGS & STORIES Billionaire Pedophile Goes Free PRINT Hedge fund mogul Jeffrey Epstein became a free man Wednesday, five years after he was first accused of sexually abusing underage girls. After months of reporting, The Daily Beast's reveals exclusive details of the investigation and the legal wrangling that saved him from a long prison term. She reports: • Palm Beach's police chief objected to Epstein's "special treatment" and gave The Daily Beast an exclusive look at his nine-hour deposition about the investigation. • Earlier versions of the U.S attorney's charges, including a sealed 53-page indictment, could have landed Epstein in prison for 20 years. • Victims alleged that Epstein molested underage girls from South America. Europe. and the former Soviet republics. including three 12-year-old girls brought over from France as a birthday gift. • The v

4p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel

The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)" alMIN>

From: (USAFLS)" alMIN> To: NIEliSAFLSr alMIE>, Subject: Status of Outstanding Motions/Discovery issue Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:36:39 +0000 Importance: Normal (USAFLS)" Hi IN and There are several motions that are fully briefed but have not been decided: DE50: Petitioners' Motion for an Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (this was "held in abeyance" while the Court ordered "limited discovery"). DE51: Petitioners' Motion to Use Correspondence to Provide Violations of the CVRA and to Have their Unredacted Pleadings Unsealed. DE56: Motion to Intervene by Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz DE93: Motion for Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein The first three were all addressed by the Court at the August 12, 2011 hearing, although the Court allowed supplemental briefing after the hearing on DE56. The last of that supplemental briefing was filed on 10/31/2011. DE93 was fully briefed on 10/14/2011. The 90-day mark on D

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.