Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
1
THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY, FLORIDA
Complex Litigation,
Fla.R.Civ. Pro.1201
Case No. 50
2009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Plaintiff,
vs.
individually, BRADLEY J.
EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M. individually,
Defendants.
The deposition of MICHAEL LEGAMARO,
called for examination, taken pursuant to the
applicable Rules pertaining to the taking of
depositions, taken before LORRAINE DUNN, a Notary
Public within and for the County of Cook, State of
Illinois, and a Certified Shorthand Reporter of
said state, CSR No. 84-2024, at Suite 500, 77 West
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077425
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, on the 11th day
of March, A.D. 2011, at 12:05 p.m.
APPEARANCES:
(100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394,
IMMIIMMINIMB), by:
appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff;
(2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard,
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409,
), by:
appeared via video teleconference on
behalf of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards.
Madison Deposition Services•70 a Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602oe:312-379-07o2
EFTA01077426
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APPEARANCES: (Continued)
(633 South Federal Highway,
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301,
), by:
appeared on behalf of Clockwork Capital
Advisers, DSquared Holdings,
D3 Capital Club, Razorback Funding.
(77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 500,
Chicago, Illinois, 60601,
), by:
appeared on behalf of the deponent.
REPORTED BY: LORRAINE DUNN, CSR No. 84-2024.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077427
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. APRILL: Whenever you're ready, we will
begin.
(WHEREUPON, the witness was duly
sworn.)
called as a witness herein, having been first duly
sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
EXAMINATION
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Sir, what is your name?
A.
Michael Legamaro, L-e-g-a-m-a-r-o.
MS. STILLMAN: I just want to say, for the
record, we discussed this before we went on the
record. Under Illinois law, any video deposition
has to have a special kind of subpoena or notice.
We were requested yesterday afternoon
by Ms. Aprill's law firm, if I recall, that
defense counsel asked to participate by video. We
were able to accommodate them. We have been
assured by defense counsel who is participating by
video that no taping is being done; that this is
strictly a live transmission.
Is that your confirmation?
MR. QUINLAN: Yes. This isn't for
videotaping purposes. It's just the chance to be
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th et-chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077428
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
able to put faces to the voices I hear during the
depo. I appreciate everybody's cooperation in
setting it up.
MS. STILLMAN: Fine. Then we can proceed.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Mr. Legamaro, my name is Susan Aprill.
We met just briefly before we got on the record.
I represent an individual named Jeffrey Epstein in
connection with a pending lawsuit in the 15th
Judicial Circuit for Palm Beach Florida. That
lawsuit is against Scott Rothstein and Bradley
Edwards.
MS. APRILL: Could you mark this for
identification, please.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 1, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
MS. STILLMAN: Excuse me. You said Scott
Rothstein. The subpoena I have says Scott
Reynolds.
MS. APRILL: Scott Reynolds? Can I see what
you're looking at? It also says Lake County,
Illinois, where we're not.
MS. STILLMAN: Right. We decided not to make
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077429
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
an issue.
MS. APRILL: All right. Well, that's
interesting. I caught the Lake County. Thank
you.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Well, let me ask you this: Have you
ever seen, sir, a notice, or more specifically, a
renotice of taking your deposition for today?
A.
I don't know what I've seen. I have
seen something very similar to what you're
holding.
Q.
I am going to ask the court reporter to
mark this for clarify.
MS. STILLMAN: The witness has seen the
original subpoena. I've never seen the renotice,
either.
MS. APRILL: May I see what you have there
and make sure at least the attachments are the
same, because that's what I'm concerned about.
Schedule A is really what I wanted.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
I am going to show you what our
reporter has marked as Exhibit 1 for today's
deposition and ask you if you have seen it or any
part of it since there may be some portion you
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077430
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
haven't seen?
(WHEREUPON, the document was
tendered to the witness.)
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't know that I've seen all of it
but I have seen part of it.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
At the very end, I think it is the last
two, three pages, there is Exhibit A that is
titled.
Have you seen that before, Exhibit A?
A.
Yes, I have.
Q.
I understand that you are represented
by counsel today. It is never my intention at all
to ask you to disclose anything that is
privileged. If you feel I am asking it, certainly
I will try to rephrase it.
Did you ask anyone to locate any
documents that you believe are responsive to
Schedule A?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object to what he
asked. If you want to ask him what he did to
search for documents, that's fine.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Okay. Did you conduct a search or
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077431
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
36
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
cause a search to be conducted for any documents
you believe to be responsive?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did you identify certain responsive
documents?
A.
Actually, I did not, but I turned my
files over, all of my files over to the firm.
Q.
Have you seen the documents that were
provided to me as a result of that?
A.
I'm not certain what you were provided.
I have seen a set of documents that I was told
were provided to you.
Q.
Is it correct for me to understand that
there are documents in the file that you searched
or caused to be searched that were not produced to
me today?
MS. STILLMAN: Relating to what, counsel?
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Let me ask you this: Do you have --
the documents that were produced to me, did they
come out of a file that was designated by a matter
name or number?
MS. STILLMAN: Counsel, you're assuming that
they came out of a hard copy search as opposed to
an electronic search.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077432
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 2
13
14
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2.4
25
MS. APRILL: Actually, I'm not. I'm asking
the question. I understand that people keep
things in folders.
MS. STILLMAN: Can I hear the question back,
then?
(WHEREUPON, the record was read
by the reporter as requested.)
MS. STILLMAN: If you know.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't know.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Have you ever given a deposition
before?
A.
Yes.
Q.
More than once?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Have you ever given any deposition in
connection with any case where one of the parties
is Scott Rothstein?
A.
No.
Q.
Do you know Scott Rothstein?
A.
I have met him.
Q.
Since you've been deposed before, I
will not belabor the point, but clearly if I ask
you a question and you don't know the answer, I'm
Madison Deposition Setvices.70 W Madison 14th m.chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077433
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
36
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
sure you will tell me you don't know, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And, likewise, if I ask a question that
doesn't make sense to you or needs to be restated,
you'll ask me, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Thank you. When you saw Exhibit A,
which is part of Exhibit 1 that has been marked
which is in front of you today, did you recognize
a particular matter by title that you had worked
on in the firm that you felt would have documents
that might be responsive?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Could you tell me what that matter
how you designate the matter so that when I'm
asking you questions, it will be easier?
A.
Well, we had a matter involving a
client.
MS. STILLMAN: The name of the client -- you
can give the name of the client.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
So the name of the client would be
Ritchie Capital or Thane Ritchie, individually.
MS. APRILL: That makes it a lot easier for
me to focus my questions.
Madison Deposition Services•10 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077434
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you currently represent Thane
Ritchie or Ritchie Capital?
A.
Yes.
Q.
In 2009, did you represent either or
both of them?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Which?
A.
Both.
Q.
Did you represent both Ritchie Capital
and Thane Ritchie, which I am going to refer to
just as Ritchie, if that is okay with you?
A.
Fine.
Q.
In connection with an investigation of
an investment that was being offered by Scott
Rothstein?
MS. STILLMAN: Wait a minute. At the
investigation? I'm going to object as vague.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you represent them -- well, did you
represent them -- strike that. Let's back up.
You said you met Scott Rothstein?
A.
Yes.
Q.
When did you meet Scott Rothstein?
A.
Late September, early October 2009.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077435
12
1
2
3
L
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
:2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2.1
22
23
24
25
Q.
Where did you meet him?
A.
In his office.
Q.
Before you met him in his office, had
you ever spoken to him on the phone?
A.
No.
Q.
What caused you to meet with him in his
office at that time?
A.
I traveled to Florida with a client on
other business and we collectively went to meet
Scott Rothstein.
Q.
Was that client Thane Ritchie?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Were you there for a number of days?
A.
No.
Q.
One day?
A.
We arrived midnight one night and we
left by 10 p.m. the next day.
Q.
What was the purpose of you going to
Scott Rothstein's office?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection. You can ask him
what he did there in the presence of Scott
Rothstein, but the purpose would be privileged.
MS. APRILL: All right.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Let me ask you this: Were you invited
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077436
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
by anyone other than your client to be present at
Mr. Rothstein's office?
A.
Well, not that I'm aware of, no.
Q.
All of this is, of course, if you know
and if you remember.
A.
Not that I recall, right.
Q.
When you went to Scott Rothstein's
office, was there anyone else present there?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you remember who?
A.
Well, John Kurmath, who is the
president of Ritchie Capital and A.J. Discala.
Q.
Did you know A.J. Discala prior it is
this that day?
A.
I had spoken to A.J. Discala a few
years ago, something completely unrelated, and I
met him at breakfast that morning.
Q.
Had you ever represented A.J. Discala?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Were you representing him at the time
you had breakfast with him?
A.
No, not A.J. personally.
Q•
Who else was at the breakfast?
A.
No one.
Q.
Was your client with you as well?
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.2:312-379-0702
EFTA01077437
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes, Thane Ritchie, A.J. Discala.
Q.
And what was the subject matter?
MS. STILLMAN: Of breakfast?
MS. APRILL: Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: To the extent that there
was -- A.J., though, he said personally, but A.J.
was a principal of a client. So, to the extent
that there was any discussion that related to the
client of which A.J. was a principal, we're going
to assert the privilege.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Let me understand something. Is it
your position that the entire conversation was
privileged?
A.
Yes.
Q.
So you didn't talk about the ball
scores or any nonlegal matters?
A.
No, I'm sure we did.
Q•
Can you tell me anything you believq is
not privileged that you talked about that morning?
A.
No, not that I recall.
Q.
So you're saying that although you did
not represent A.J. Discala personally at that
time --
A.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077438
15
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
-- you represented an entity in which
he was a principal?
A.
Yes, in fact -- yes.
Q.
Do you know the name of that?
A.
Clockwork Capital Advisors.
MS. STILLMAN: Clockwork Capital Advisors,
LLC, actually.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Had you represented Clockwork Capital
Advisors prior to that breakfast meeting prior to
that day?
A.
Quite possibly, yes.
Q.
Did you have anything to do with
forming that entity?
A.
No.
Q.
You then went after breakfast to
Mr. Rothstein's office?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you go to the other business
meeting you had?
A.
We did, Thane and I did.
Q.
Do you know what time of day,
approximately, you went to Scott Rothstein's
office?
A.
We let's put it this way: We arrived,
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077439
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
we were in West Palm Beach, so we had to drive
from West Palm Beach after lunch to
Ft. Lauderdale, so we arrived at 2:30 or so.
Q.
So you went to Rothstein's office. Can
you tell me what Mr. Rothstein did when you
arrived?
A.
He greeted us and brought us into his
office.
Q.
And was anyone else there from his
firm?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you have a -- did anyone else join
you during the meeting other than people you've
already mentioned?
A.
No.
Q.
So it was just four of you?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What occurred during the meeting?
A.
Well, Rothstein explained what he was
doing in terms of structured settlements. We
reviewed examples of some of those structured
settlement cases and we left, I suppose, in that
order.
Q.
When you say he explained what he was
doing running structured settlements, had you seen
Madison Deposition Services•70 VI Madison 11th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077440
17
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
22
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
any documentation about what he was doing before
arriving that day?
A.
No.
Q.
Had you ever heard of Scott Rothstein
other than in the context of a privileged
conversation?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you do anything to check him out as
a person before going to the meeting?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you know what he did for a living?
A.
Only by the assumption that he was --
his name was on the door of a law firm, so I
presumed he was a lawyer.
Q.
Did you know anything about the nature
of his practice?
A.
Before : arrived or when I arrived?
Q.
Before you arrived.
A.
No.
Q.
When you arrived, did he explain to you
anything about his practice before talking about
these structured settlements?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What did he say, as best you can
recall?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077441
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
That he was a plaintiff's lawyer and
predominantly they were doing -- well, the firm
itself was a full-service firm, but his particular
background was in litigation, plaintiff's
litigation, predominantly.
Q.
Did he mention that he specialized in
any type of litigation like employment law or
anything?
A.
I think he did, employment, labor, yes,
representing plaintiffs in labor disputes.
Q•
career?
Q.
Have you ever done that in your own
No.
When you were at his office, you said
you reviewed some I think you said some examples?
Q.
Can you tell me how it came about?
Did Scott immediately show you some documents or
how did it occur?
A.
He did not immediately show some
documents. We talked for 30 minutes, maybe
longer, about his structured settlement business
if we call it that, and he invited us to take a
look at case files or what I call case files, I
suppose. He left the room while Thane and I
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077442
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
examined those case files and then he came back
and we talked some more.
Q.
Now, do you know the exact date that
this occurred?
A.
No.
Q.
Do you know what day of the week it
occurred on?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Was it a week day, though?
A.
Absolutely.
Q.
Do you have any calendars or records
that would tell you the exact date if you were to
look at them?
A.
Presumably, yes.
Q.
Are those personal files or firm files?
A.
Firm files, billing matters, billing
files.
Q.
Was this a billable event, this
meeting?
A.
Yes.
Q.
As best you can recall, what did you
look at in these case files? What was the
character of the papers?
A.
They were pleadings predominantly that
I can recall, complaint, maybe motions, motions
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077443
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
practice, that sort of thing. I'm not quite sure
exactly. I don't recall exactly what they were
but they were pleading documents. They were
pleadings. They could be things like motions for
summary judgment, that sort of thing, complaint,
answer, things that I would expect to find in a
piece of litigation.
Q.
Was this file that you -- you looked at
files for multiple plaintiffs?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you look at these files just for
one plaintiff, then?
A.
That's the only one I can recall, yes.
Q.
Do you remember the name of the
plaintiff or how the plaintiff was designated if
not by full name?
A.
There was no name listed for plaintiff.
Indeed your question was accurate in that the
plaintiff was designated by name as LM which
sticks in my head.
Q.
And were you -- during the time that
Scott was talking to you about the settlement, did
he talk to you about what the LM case was about
before he showed it to you?
A.
I don't recall.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chlcago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077444
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did he tell you who the defendant was?
A.
In that case, again, I don't recall.
Just to be clear, he did not -- we could have
chosen any case file. Our conversations were
broader and I picked the case file to be the LM.
He did not show us. There were boxes. He said
those are case files, take a look, and I picked up
LM.
Q.
Now, the room that you were in when you
looked at these files, the LM file, was it a
conference room such as the one we're in?
A.
No.
Q.
Can you tell me what kind of a space
you were in?
A.
Scott Rothstein's office I understood
it to be.
Q.
In that office, was there a seating
area with a sectional sofa and some other
accessory furniture?
A.
Possibly.
Q.
Did you sit on a sofa or at a
table when you were --
A.
Sat at a table
Q.
So was there a conference table in
there?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077445
22
3.
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2C
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes.
Q.
Was it as large as the one we're
sitting at today, which I would say is eight or
nine feet?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Were the boxes that he invited you to
examine, if that's the right way to say it, were
they on the table?
A.
No.
Q.
How were they arranged in the room?
A.
They were in the corner.
Q.
Were they stacked up?
A.
One, two high, maybe. There were
approximately, let's say, approximately four
boxes.
Q.
Again, I jumped to the conclusion that
they were in boxes. These are like the typical
banker boxes that you use in a firm?
A.
Exactly.
Q.
So you think there were about four
boxes in the corner two high?
A.
Tops were open, that I recall.
Q.
Was there any marking on the outside of
the box, a label or a number?
A.
Not that I recall.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077446
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
/,
^fl
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did you move them from the corner to
the table so that you could examine them?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did the others who were with you also
look at the contents?
A.
Yes.
Q.
I'm trying to get a picture of the
scene, forgive me.
Can you describe to me were you each
looking at separate parts of the file or were you
kind of looking all together at any given pages?
A.
Well, there was really only two of us
looking, Thane Ritchie and myself personally.
we
Q.
Mr. Discala was not there?
A.
No, he left. Just to clarify, again,
talked to Scott. He invited us, Thane and I,
to take -- and presumably John Kurmath who I
believe left on the phone, he departed. Kermath
is, K-e-r-m-a-t-h. I think he was dealing with
other business and he left the room. A.J. Discala
left the room. Scott Rothstein left the room.
Thane and I sat there and reviewed files for a few
minutes and then Scott came back.
Q.
When you say a few minutes, about how
much time did you spend --
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077447
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2C
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Fifteen, twenty minutes.
Q.
Do you recall seeing anything in those
files that contained -- well, you said you saw
court papers, pleadings?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Was the plaintiff
was the
defendant's name on there? I'm not asking you if
you remember it. I mean was it blocked out or was
it visible?
A.
The defendant's name was visible.
There were two defendants, I recall.
Q.
Do you remember, sitting here today,
who they were?
A.
I remember one was named Jeffrey
Epstein and one was a woman.
Q.
Did you know who Jeffrey Epstein was
prior to looking at those papers?
A.
Not really, no. I don't recall.
Q.
Well, did Mr. Rothstein describe
anything about Jeff Epstein before you actually
looked at papers?
A.
I don't remember the order of that, so
I can't say with clarity.
Q.
Did you make any notes about what you
saw in the files?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077448
25
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
I wrote down the case number. That's
the only note I recall taking, the Florida case
file number.
Q.
Do you recall, you said about
30 minutes
you did not.
Do you know how long you spent actually
perusing files?
A.
Fifteen, twenty minutes.
Q.
So I understand it, Scott left several
boxes, you did not look at each of the files in
the boxes?
A.
That's correct.
Q.
You made a random selection?
A.
I believe I took whatever was on the
top.
Q.
Were they in binders, the files that
you looked at?
A.
They were binders in the sense that
they had two-hole punches in there.
Q.
At the top?
A.
Precisely.
Q.
Did Mr. Ritchie, if you know, look at
some of the other files that you didn't look at?
A.
Yes, he did look at other files I did
not look at.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th Fi.•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077449
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Then I presume you discussed them and
that is a privileged conversation?
A.
Yes.
Q.
I think you can tell me this. Did you
talk about them before Mr. Rothstein came back in
the room?
A.
Yes.
Q.
You said you wrote down a case number?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did you make any phone calls when you
were in the room to someone at your firm, for
example, to look up the case?
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you have a laptop or some sort of
device with you to make any notes or go on the
internet to look at the case file?
A.
No.
Q.
Was this, if you remember, a federal or
a state court case?
A.
It was a state court case.
Q.
Do you remember that just because you
remember it or because Scott had described the
case being in state court?
A.
I recall writing down the case number.
It was not a federal case number.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077450
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q•
Did you subsequently yourself or ask a
colleague to look at the complete file in the Palm
Beach court?
A.
On-line?
Q.
Any way.
A.
Yes. I don't know exactly what I
asked, but I asked somebody to examine, make
certain the case was, in fact, filed --
Q.
Okay.
A.
-- once I had returned to Chicago.
Q.
Now, I take it that this case that you
examined was at that time not the subject of one
of the settlements that was being discussed, is
that right?
A.
It was an active case file, so I don't
know that it was or it wasn't.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein show you or make
available for your inspection that day any other
documents that concerned cases that were presuit,
a dispute existed but he had not yet filed a case?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did he talk to you about having
settlements in process for cases that had not yet
been filed?
A.
He may have
I recall him mentioning
Madison Deposition sorvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077451
28
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2.4
25
that he had previously done such cases. I don't
know that he discussed any future cases that he
would have filed; in other words, I want to say
that his business plan as related to structured
settlements in part involved in some cases -- not
necessarily the ones that were active -- but in
some cases were presuit settlements.
Q.
Is it accurate to say that what Scott
Rothstein was talking to you and the others who
were in that room with you about was an investment
in a single settlement?
A.
No.
Q.
Can you tell me what the product was
that you were investing in? Was it a package of
settlements?
A.
No. It was more a prospective proposal
about future settlements and Scott Rothstein's
ability to deliver multiple settlements for future
use.
Q.
What was the purpose then for him
showing you files?
A.
It was giving us examples of cases in
which he had been involved.
Q.
I see.
A.
Or was currently then involved.
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077452
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
24
15
16
11
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
^ r
J
Q.
So you didn't have -- is it correct to
say that you did not believe that any investment
that might be made was going to be in the LM
settlement?
A.
At the time, that's right, yes, that's
correct to say.
Q.
After you looked at the files that
Mr. Rothstein made available, did you have any
further conversations with him?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Can you tell me what he said and what
was said back?
A.
As you may recall, I testified that he
came back to the room. We then presumably -- not
just presumably, we talked about the case file
that we had in front of me and in front of Thane,
which was if I recall similar to if not -- I don't
recall what Thane's case was exactly -- then we
discussed other cases that Rothstein either had
active cases or would in the future start cases.
Q.
that?
Do you remember anything about any of
A.
Well, I remember the latter case, for
example, was a key tab case involving a government
contract with the navy or the army or something
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077453
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
and maybe orange juice or something like this
where supposedly a supplier to the government was
cheating the government, basically.
Q.
So, at that meeting, were your clients
being asked to invest a certain amount of money?
A.
No.
Q.
Would you consider this a preliminary
meeting to -- was this the first time -- strike
that.
How long did you spend at his office,
Rothstein's?
A.
To include waiting in the waiting room
or the front door?
Q.
Well, no, just with him.
A.
In his office, oh, an hour.
Q.
The boxes you said were already in the
room when you came into the room?
A.
Yes.
Q.
You don't remember anyone carrying them
in your presence?
A.
No.
I remember that no one did carry
them in. They were in the room when I was there,
to make that clear.
Q.
Was there anyone who removed those
boxes or any part of the files in your presence?
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077454
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
No.
Q.
Did the meeting conclude with any
agreement to confer further with Rothstein?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What happened?
A.
We agreed to have further conversations
about Rothstein's business of structured
settlements and we -- that was pretty much the end
of it. We said good-bye and left.
Q.
Did you confer further with him?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Can you tell me when that occurred with
respect to this meeting? Was it the next day or
the next month?
A.
In fact, it was probably within an hour
because we were -- we went downstairs to a
restaurant, bar, if you will, and had a drink. We
were waiting for somebody to do something. It may
have been John Kurmath to return to us, I don't
recall exactly. And Rothstein showed up.
Q.
In the restaurant?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if this is the restaurant
in his office building that he owned?
A.
Yes. It is called Bova.
Madison Deposition services•70 N Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602.2:312-379-0702
EFTA01077455
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
13
1 4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did he tell you he owned it?
A.
He did.
Q.
I suppose he picked up the drink tab?
I'm kidding.
A.
I don't recall who did.
Q.
So he joined you at your table or
booth?
A.
Yes, or didn't -- join us isn't the
right word. He showed up. I don't know that he
sat.
Q.
All right.
A.
He said hello, good-bye and it was
chitchat.
Q.
Was he with anyone else that was in the
chitchat?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
After that, when is the next time that
you had any communication with Scott Rothstein?
A.
Within the -- the times are a little
bit -- so within two weeks or so, I would say,
maybe three -- actually maybe not even that long.
I don't recall exactly when the meeting was.
In fairly short order, within a
two-week period, maybe, I called him to ask him to
tell us under what circumstances the selling of
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077456
33
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
structured settlements was permissible without
court approval.
Q.
This was a telephone call?
A.
Right. Actually, let me correct that.
As I recall, I told A.J. Discala from Clockwork
Capital Advisors.
MS. STILLMAN: I object.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
A.J. got Scott Rothstein on the phone.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Were you all on the phone together?
A.
Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: You can talk about once Scott
Rothstein joining the phone call but not before
that.
THE WITNESS: Fair enough.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
By the way, about Clockwork, you say
they were a client of this firm at that time?
A.
Yes. The timing is a bit of a mystery
to me because Nina has instructed me not to look
at my files.
MS. STILLMAN: I can tell you that they were
a client.
BY THE WITNESS:
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077457
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
So the timing is a bit of a problem for
purposes of this, but Clockwork eventually becomes
a client, yes.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
As far as you're concerned, during
these communications we've been discussing,
Clockwork was either a client or seeking legal
advice and about to be a client?
A.
Yes.
Q.
You were saying --
A.
So the three of us and maybe one other
in my office were on the phone and called Scott to
say hey, our research has indicated that --
MS. STILLMAN: Okay. This is what you said
in the call?
THE WITNESS: Exactly.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
So our research has indicated that at
least we have an issue with regard to selling
structured settlements outside of court approval
and I wanted to know on what basis he could do so.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
What did he say?
A.
He said oh, we're not settling tort
cases. There is some reason, I can't remember
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-C702
EFTA01077458
35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
what it is, he's like there was a reason. He may
have tried to call somebody else to get them on
the phone. He said I'll get back to you, and then
he did via an e-mail.
Q.
He sent you an e-mail explaining why
these cases did not require court approval?
A.
That's right.
Q•
Is that one of the documents you
produced to me?
A.
I believe so.
MS. STILLMAN: Yes.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Then what happened as far as
communications with Scott?
A.
As far as I can recall, I had no
further attempts to contact Scott nor do I recall
him speaking to me directly, with him directly.
Q.
Ever?
A.
Ever.
Q.
Do you know Dean Kretschmar?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Where did you meet him?
A.
Well, he became -- he borrowed money
essentially from an entity controlled by Thane
Ritchie.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077459
36
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2n
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Do you know what that entity was?
A.
Mercata Justa, LLC, M-e-r-c-a-t-a
J-u-s-t-a, LLC, lent money to an entity controlled
by Dean Kretschmar. He guaranteed the loan.
Q.
Do you know why he borrowed the money?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection. You're asking him
to
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you ever talk to Dean Kretschmar
personally?
A.
Yes, but not about the loan. When
Scott Rothstein was arrested, then I met Dean
Kretschmar. I've had several conversations with
Kretschmar.
Q.
Your recall of meeting Dean occurs
after Scott Rothstein was arrested?
Q.
What I was wanting to ask you about
Mercata Justa doesn't really go to privilege. Was
the money, if you know, or the entity he was
borrowing it for to be invested in a Rothstein
matter?
A.
I don't know why it was borrowed, but
eventually I know it was, in fact, invested in
something called D3.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077460
37
1
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Is that the D3 Capital Club, LLC?
Yes, that is my impression.
Q.
Did you ever hear of the D3 Capital
Club, LLC prior to Scott Rothstein's arrest?
A.
Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: Okay. If you learned about it
in a privileged conversation --
MS. APRILL: I'm not asking that.
MS. STILLMAN: She has the right. Did you
and when.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Yes, the answer is yes.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Club?
Do you know who formed the D3 Capital
MS. STILLMAN: If you know outside of a
privileged --
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I do not.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
You never represented D3?
A.
That's correct.
Q.
When I say you, I mean you or anyone in
your firm.
A.
That's correct, to the best of my
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL'Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077461
38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
knowledge about the firm, that's right, yes.
Q.
Is it your testimony that you never met
Dean Rretschmar at any time while in Scott
Rothstein's suite of offices?
A.
That's what I recall, yes. I do not
recall meeting Dean Kretschmar with Scott
Rothstein.
Q.
Did you ever meet Dean's stepfather,
Mr. Von Allman?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you ever know David Von Allmen?
Did you ever hear that name?
A.
David Von Allmen?
Q.
Doug Von Allmen, excuse me. There are
several Von Allmen.
A.
Yes. I have heard that name, yes.
Q.
After you talked to Scott Rothstein on
the telephone and he answered you by e-mail, did
you ever speak to him at all even in a brief phone
call?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
So I'm understanding -- well, your
testimony is you were only in his office on one
occasion?
A.
That's right, very clearly, only in his
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077462
39
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
office on one occasion.
Q.
Were you ever in the Judge Advocate
Corps?
A.
I was, in fact.
Q.
In which branch of the military?
A.
In the army.
Q•
Sometimes called the JAG, right?
A.
It is indeed.
Q.
Did you ever mention while in Scott
Rothstein's office that you had been involved in
the prosecution of cases of abuse or something
like that when you were in the JAG?
MS. STILLMAN: In front of Mr. Rothstein?
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Not that I recall.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you remember ever telling him that
you had been in the JAG Corps?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you, in fact, ever investigate or
prosecute cases concerning sexual abuse or --
A.
Yes.
Q.
Something like this
A.
I did.
Q.
You did?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•F:312-379-0702
EFTA01077463
40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2C
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes, I did.
Q.
Did they have any similarity to the
kind of allegations that you read in the files at
Rothstein's office?
A.
Generally, no. They were young
children. My impression of the LM case is that
she was not as young. She would have been a
teenager.
Q.
So your own experience as an attorney
in the military was prosecuting perpetrators of
crimes against very young children?
A.
No. I had, of course, many trials as a
prosecutor in the army, but my child sexual cases
were, to the best of my recollection, only young,
little children.
Q.
Like under ten?
A.
Yes, like under ten, exactly.
Q.
But that experience was in the
military, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you remember ever discussing it with
any -- if not with Scott Rothstein -- with anybody
with whom you don't claim a privilege while you
were in Florida?
A.
While in Florida, not that I recall.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.F:312-319-0702
EFTA01077464
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Now, do you recall if the day that you
visited Rothstein's office, A.J. Discala -- you
have to decide if this is privileged or not?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm waiting to hear.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
-- told you that he had attended a
Dolphins-Jets game the night before?
MS. STILLMAN: Even if he was a client, it's
not a privileged statement, so you can answer.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't recall that at all. A.J.
Discala never told me he attended a Dolphins-Jets
game.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein mention that he had
provided complimentary passes or tickets for
individuals who might be interested in investing
with him for that, for a game like that the day
before you were there?
A.
No, never told me.
Q.
You said that Scott Rothstein
you
went to his office and he told you about the
nature of the investments in the structured
settlements.
Can you tell me what he said the terms
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL'Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077465
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
of the deal would be?
A.
Of the various deals, they were
typically involved -- his prototypical case
involved sexual harassment complaints between
employer and employee, and employee would threaten
or actually sue employer who then became concerned
about confidentiality and ultimately would settle
the case on the premise that in large part he was
buying -- sorry -- the employer, was buying
confidentiality.
So Scott Rothstein was working, was
creating value for his plaintiffs by reference to
the confidentiality of the ultimate settlement.
Q.
What was the structured part of it?
A.
Well, once the plaintiff and defendant
settled, the plaintiff -- I'm sorry -- the
defendant would post money into a bank account
which would be released to the plaintiff over a
period of time or upon date in the future. The
settlements were structured in a way so that they
were assignable.
In some cases, then, the plaintiff was
interested in being paid immediately or soon. So
what would happen is that Rothstein would arrange
for people to purchase the cash in the bank, so tc
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077466
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
speak, in advance, generate proceeds which he
would then turn over to his plaintiff and she or
he, as the case may be, would be out.
Q.
So the plaintiff would be paid in full
at a much earlier date than they would be if there
were no third parties investing?
Yes, exactly right.
Q.
Did you understand if the money was
being paid in by a defendant at one time, the
front end of the settlement, why they just didn't
pay it all to the plaintiff?
A.
Again, it was based on -- I asked Sco
Rothstein exactly that question.
His answer was it was based upon the
confidentiality component that the defendants were
very concerned that the plaintiff would breach the
confidentiality component and, as such, intended
to leave the confidentiality or better yet the
payment of the larger settlement as a hammer, if
you will, over the head of the plaintiff.
So to the extent that typically the
cases you might imagine that he was talking about
involved a male employer who might actually be the
boss of the company and his -- somebody in the
office who became disgruntled upon the end of a
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077467
44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
112
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
prior affair. So the idea was that the scorned
woman, if you will, which is exactly how Scott
would describe it, would be --
Q.
Bought off?
A.
-- bought off quickly.
Q.
Sorry. I didn't mean to answer for
you.
A.
Understood.
Q.
I'm missing something here. If these
settlements could be assigned -- the right to
collect the money could be assigned, then the
individual, for example, LM --
A.
The plaintiff, yes.
Q.
-- the plaintiff would be getting all
of the money at an earlier date -- should be
getting a lower amount of money but at an earlier
date.
A.
Yes.
Q.
So instead of getting a million
dollars, perhaps the plaintiff would get half a
million dollars?
A.
Precisely.
Q.
At which time she would have no
incentive to keep quiet, right?
A.
Yes.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077468
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Didn't that defeat the whole purpose of
having the settlement?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I asked Rothstein exactly this line of
questions.
MS. STILLMAN: He cannot opine on whether
this was a good deal, bad.
MS. APRILL: I'm asking what Scott told you
about it.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Because I asked Scott Rothstein a very
similar line of questioning. And his answer was
that the plaintiffs -- sorry -- defense counsel
inevitably didn't really know that this
transaction was occurring.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
I see.
A.
And, as such, they were not keen to
draft their settlement agreements in a way so that
they were not assignable.
Q.
Did you have any experience, prior to
talking with Scott Rothstein, in structured
settlements?
No.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077469
46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
A.
You are not a litigator, sir, are you?
I am not.
Q.
How do you describe your practice?
A.
I am a tax lawyer.
Q.
In any particular subspecialty or are
you just a tax lawyer?
A.
I practice what I call global private
client work. We provide an integrated,
multi-jurisdictional, multi-practice group of
services for very wealthy clients, usually
families.
Q.
Sounds good. So this investment that
you talked to Scott Rothstein about, was this
typical of the kinds of investments that your
clients --
MS. STILLMAN: Objection to typical.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
-- in your experience?
Had you ever heard of an investment
product like this before?
A.
I've heard of, I suppose, structured
settlements, but I'd never been involved in any,
no.
Q•
Now, did Scott Rothstein tell you
anything about this defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-373-0702
EFTA01077470
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
:0
11
12
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
and the woman who was named on the file you looked
at?
A.
I believe he told me that he was a
billionaire living in south Florida.
Q.
At that time, did he show you any
dossier or any information about Mr. Epstein?
A.
No, he did not.
Q.
Did he ever show you a document that he
represented to be a flight log from an airplane?
A.
Yes, he did.
Q.
Was that one of the documents in the
boxes that you produced?
A.
I don't think so, no.
Q.
Can you tell me what you recall about
seeing this flight log?
A.
It was by this point presumably copied.
It was not a good -- I don't know what flight logs
look like, but it was not a very well -- it was an
original document for certain, and in fact, if
memory serves, it was copied poorly so it was
tilted. On it were names of people and -- yes,
names of people.
Q.
Did he say why he was showing it to
you?
A.
Well, he was claiming that this flight
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077471
48
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
manifest was, in fact, a flight manifest for a
plane in which Epstein -- Epstein's plane I
believe is what he said -- and young girls and
high-profile celebrities.
Q.
Did you recognize any a names on the
manifest?
A.
I believe that one of them was Prince
Andrew.
Q.
Do you remember if Bill Clinton was on
the list?
A.
I don't know if Bill Clinton was on
that list. It was either Bill Clinton was either
on that list or Prince Andrew was on that list,
and the other lists which he refers he had other
ones with somebody else, you know, the other party
on it.
Q.
What did you understand to be the
purpose of him showing that to you?
A.
He was saying that here's a flight list
with Jeffrey Epstein, a high-profile celebrity,
and young girls.
Q.
Do you believe this was part of his
pitch to you as to why confidentiality was
important to the defendants?
A.
Yes, yes.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14:h FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077472
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did he tell you Jeffrey Epstein had
agreed to enter into any settlement with LM, for
example?
A.
Not that I recall at this time.
Q.
Did he tell you who in his firm
negotiated the settlement, settlement that he
described?
A.
Well, they were -- he left the distinct
impression that there was essentially a machine of
sorts involving various partners or whatever in
the firm that was organized in a fashion so that
either lawyers within the firm or co-counsel from
outside the firm fed these structured -- fed cases
to the firm so that they could be packaged, if you
will, for settlement purposes.
Q.
Did he ever mention the names of any of
those individuals?
At the firm?
Q.
Yes.
A.
No, not that I recall.
Q.
Did you notice when you were looking at
the files that he made available for your review
the names of any of the attorneys who had signed
the pleadings or papers?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison. 14th FL•C:cago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077473
50
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Do you remember who any of them were?
A.
I remember somebody by the name of Brad
Edwards.
Q.
Did you ever meet Brad Edwards?
A.
I had not, that I recall.
Q.
Did you ask Mr. Rothstein about him,
anything about him?
A.
About Brad Edwards?
Q.
Yes.
A.
No, not that I recall.
Q.
Did you learn anything about Brad
Edwards other than his name was on the papers?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you determine whether he was a
skilled attorney? Successful is maybe a better
word.
A.
No.
Q.
So when you talked about this machine a
moment ago
A.
Yes.
Q.
-- within that, do you know whether you
were told by Scott Rothstein who actually in his
firm would be the one to negotiate the settlement
terms?
A.
Maybe he said that the lawyers -- I
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077474
51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
presume --
MS. STILLMAN: Well, if you remember.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't recall what he said.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did he talk about Brad Edwards as being
good at these kinds of cases?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did he talk about any other lawyers by
name in his firm who he relied upon to assist him
with this packaging of settlements?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did he mention the next named partner,
Stuart Rosenfeld, in any capacity?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Russell Adler?
A.
Again, not that I recall.
Q.
Do you know if you met anyone else from
the firm, even when you were in the waiting area?
You mentioned you were waiting to see Scott for a
time.
A.
Yes, I mean, obviously, I didn't
meet -- greeted by the receptionist. Then there
is somebody outside Scott's office that we said
hello to and that was it.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077475
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did Scott tell you about the
investigative team he had assembled to investigate
defendants such as Jeffrey Epstein?
A.
Yes. I don't know -- he may not have
mentioned it in the context of Epstein or he
discussed an investigative team or at least an
investigator.
Q.
Did he tell you the name of the person
or persons?
A.
I suspect he did at the time because I
remember it was a former police chief or sheriff
or something like that.
Q.
Does the name Ken Jenny sound --
A.
No, I wouldn't recall.
Q.
You said former sheriff, so I thought
I'd try that.
A.
It was a former reasonably high profile
somebody in the area.
Q.
Did you ever come to learn that
Mr. Rothstein liked to collect other reasonably
high profile lawyers or retired judges at the
firm?
A.
Yes, of course, because his walls were
plastered with John McCain and regaled us with his
stories of John McCain and Charlie Crist,
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077476
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
:0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. It's all part of
the Rothstein mystique, I'm sure you're aware of.
Q.
Not as much as you might think. That's
partly what I'm asking you about. I've never been
in that office.
So he did spend some time boasting?
A.
Oh, sure he did. Most of it.
Q.
Getting back to the investigators for a
moment, the investigators -- so he mentioned that
this one that was a former police chief or
sheriff?
A.
Right. In fact, as I recall, it was --
they were about to start or hadn't started or just
started. They were new.
Q.
Did he talk about the kind of -- any
techniques that his investigators used that he
thought were special?
A.
He described it as trash diving or
trash collecting or Dumpster diving -- I'm not
sure exactly what the term of art is -- but the
idea of going through people's trash. That's what
made his investigative skills unique.
Q.
He hasn't been to the back of my house.
So he described that as part of his
operation?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•p:312-379-0702
EFTA01077477
54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes, exactly, which is where I believe
the flight manifest was supposedly produced. In
fact, I believe it was really in that context, oh,
we have crack investigators, we look through
people's trash, here's a flight manifest, look
what we have.
Q.
Did you get the impression that Scott
Rothstein himself did any work on these files,
legal work?
A.
Legal work, I don't know about legal
work, but certainly he would represent them as his
clients.
I believe he had relationships. I
would consider them to be classically
attorney-client relationships notwithstanding the
fact that he may not have gone to court concerning
them but may have had relationships with
plaintiffs, yes.
Q.
Did you ask him if you would be able to
interview any plaintiffs?
No.
Q.
Did he offer to make any plaintiffs
available to talk about their case?
Q.
Did he say that his investigators used
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL.chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077478
55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
^ r
J
any electronic surveillance or bugs?
A.
Not that 1'n aware of. Not that I
recall.
Q.
He didn't say one way or the other?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did he show you any pictures that
appeared to be taken by unknown surveillance?
A.
No, he did not show us pictures.
Q.
How long have you been with this firm?
A.
Since July of 2009.
Q.
Prior to that, were you with a firm?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What firm was that?
A.
Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal.
Q.
A.
Q.
Here in Chicago?
Yes.
Was Ritchie, the entity and the person,
a client of yours when you came to the firm?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did you prepare any documentation for
your clients such as a private placement
memorandum to be used in connection with any
Rothstein investment?
A.
I did not, no.
Q.
Did you review any such document
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077479
56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
prepared by anyone else such as Rothstein?
MS. STILLMAN: Wait a minute. He can say
whether he reviewed a document prepared by a
nonclient but not whether any of the clients might
have sent him any drafts.
MS. APRILL: I don't think I asked him
anything about the clients in that one.
MS. STILLMAN: You said such as Rothstein, so
I just wanted to make sure
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Rothstein never sent me a private
placement memorandum to review, no.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did any attorneys working for any other
nonclient send you any private placement
memorandum in connection with any investments
being pitched by Scott Rothstein?
Q.
Did you ever use the letters PPM in an
e-mail?
A.
Q.
What does that stand for?
A.
Private placement memorandum.
Q•
Let me show that to you in a moment.
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to want a very brief
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077480
57
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
break when you come to a stopping point.
MS. APRILL: Let me go just through a couple
of these.
MS. STILLMAN: Sure.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Without invading any area you consider
privileged, with respect to the Scott Rothstein
matters, what legal services did you provide?
Can you characterize, I mean, was it going to meet
with him or was there some other thing you did?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm not sure
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Let's do it this way: We represented,
for example, Mercata Justa in a loan to Dean
Kretschmar or an affiliate of Dean Kretschmar in
connection which, in turn, became a source of cash
by which he put in D3, as I understand it, and D3
purchased supposedly something from Rothstein, for
example.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Was there anything else like that?
A.
Well, we were asked to --
MS. STILLMAN: No, no. All you can say is
you provided legal advice to our clients in
connection with the variety of deals.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077481
58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APR1LL:
Q.
Did you prepare any documents after
meeting with Scott Rothstein -- well, at any time
before or after, but in connection with the
Rothstein investment that were sent to nonclients
such as a letter of intent or a term sheet?
A.
I don't recall. No, I don't recall.
Q.
You say you don't recall. You did
review some of your files before coming here
today?
A.
Yes, of course.
Q.
You didn't see anything like that?
A.
Maybe if you ask the question again.
You asked me do I recall now.
MS. STILLMAN: The only documents he reviewed
in preparation for this deposition were the
documents that were produced to you on the
subpoena. He did not review any other documents
in preparation for this deposition.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Well, I thought I understood you to say
earlier that those were culled out of a file, the
ones that have been produced to me?
A.
I just pulled the file.
Q.
You didn't do the culling?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago 11. 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077482
59
2
3
4
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Correct.
Q.
There may or may not be a letter or a
term sheet in there but you don't know?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection to the form of the
question.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Is that right?
A.
That's right, there may or may not be.
Q.
Did you deal with any other attorneys
in connection with your legal representation of
Ritchie from another office besides Scott
Rothstein's firm?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object to the
extent that he dealt with clients' attorneys.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Well, let me ask you this: I'm not
sure what that objection is. Clients attorneys
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Not in-house counsel.
BY MS. APRIL::
Q.
Okay. Not in-house counsel. I assume
you know Bill Hobbs, for example?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And he is in-house counsel?
A.
Exactly.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077483
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
I don't know that that's a privileged
question but I don't need to pursue that because I
have some other ones.
Did anybody else at this firm, Morgan
Lewis, provide services to any of your firm
clients in connection with the Scott Rothstein
investment or effort to sell an investment?
MS. STILLMAN: You're asking if other lawyers
in this firm worked on these deals?
MS. APRILL: Yes, that's what I'm asking.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Yes.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Is one of them Elizabeth Perdue?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What kind of an attorney is she? Does
she work with you?
A.
She does. She's in what is called the
business finance practice. She's really a finance
lawyer.
Q.
She's still with the firm?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if she provided services to
Ritchie, Thane Ritchie and his company?
A.
Yes.
Madison. Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077484
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Q.
Do you know if she provided services to
Clockwork, for example?
A.
I believe she provided, yes, I believe
she provided services to Clockwork, as well.
Q.
Are there any other attorneys who you
can recall working on matters that in any way
relate to Scott Rothstein?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object -- well,
let me think about that. To the extent that there
were attorneys working internally on privileged
matters, I'm not sure you're entitled to know who
they were.
MS. APRILL: What privilege is that?
MS. STILLMAN: Depending on the nature oi :he
attorneys working on it and their practice areas
might disclose the fact of what we were looking
at, what we were focusing on from a legal issues
perspective.
MS. APRILL: Work product, is that the
privilege you're relying on?
MS. STILLMAN: Both work product and
attorney-client privilege.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you recall if there were any
other -- this is not a name, it's a yes or no --
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077485
62
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
-fl
_L)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
any other attorneys who provided any services to
anybody with respect to anything that you
discussed with Scott Rothstein?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if any of them were
disclosed to persons outside of your firm; for
example, to a lawyer for another investor?
A.
You mean their names?
Q.
Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: Well, to the extent that there
were attorneys who were disclosed to nonclients,
those are listed, if at all, on the documents that
were provided to you in response to the subpoena.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know the name Marsha Foreman?
A.
I do not.
Q.
Did you recall seeing any files at the
Rothstein office that concerned a defendant named
Elite Delivery Systems?
A.
Not that I recall, no.
Q.
Do you recall seeing any engagement
letters between the Rothstein firm and any of
these plaintiffs that were the subject of the
settlements discussed with him or the cases that
could turn into settlements?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077486
63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
When?
Q.
At any time after you spoke to Scott
Rothstein that day or otherwise.
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did you see them in his office at a
subsequent date?
A.
Subsequent date.
Q.
Can you tell me how you came to see any
additional documents?
A.
They were either e-mailed to me or
mailed to me. I believe they were e-mailed. I
don't recall exactly how I got them.
Q.
From Scott --
A.
Yes. The word was engagement letter?
Q.
Yes.
A.
I'm sorry, I should say I don't recall.
MS. STILLMAN: Can we just take a brief
break?
MS. APRILL: Yes, sure.
(WHEREUPON, a recess was had.)
MS. APRILL: We're back.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Mr. Legamaro, do you remember talking
to me about October of last year?
A.
I remember talking to you. I don't
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077487
64
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
i1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
94
25
remember when it was, yes.
Q.
We had a brief conversation?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Thank you for talking to me. At that
time, my notes reflect that you said to me that
you were interested in the quality of the cases
that the Rothstein firm was -- I keep using the
word pitching because I'm not sure of the offering
to include in this settlement investment.
Do you remember talking to me about
that?
A.
I'm not sure. I don't recall that, no.
Q.
We didn't talk very long. I wanted to
pursue what you meant. What were you looking for
in those files?
A.
I would not be interested in the
quality.
Q.
You were not interested in the quality?
Maybe I misunderstood you.
A.
Q.
What is it in particular you were
looking for?
MS. STILLMAN: Are you asking for his work
product, analysis?
MS. APRILL: He has already told me what he
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077488
65
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
was looking for.
MS. STILLMAN: You obviously didn't get it
right, so I'm not going to let him testify to
that. He disagrees with what you recollect as
what he was looking for.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q•
You were just looking to confirm they
were actual cases?
A.
Yes.
Q.
I may have misunderstood you. When you
were describing the Scott Rothstein's office
MS. STILLMAN: When, in this deposition or in
this phone call?
MS. APRILL: In this deposition today. I
don't think we went through his office and the
call. It was a really short call.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Just an hour or so ago when you were
describing what was in his office that you were
permitted to examine, you mentioned there were
some boxes maybe stacked only two high in the
corner of the room. I thought I heard you say
that there were only about four boxes. Is that
correct, or were there more?
A.
Four, five. There weren't very many.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicag0 IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077489
66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
It wasn't like 15 or 19?
A.
No, it was definitely not 15 or 19.
Q.
Was Mr. Ritchie present in Scott
Rothstein's office -- if you are able to answer
this -- on behalf of Ritchie Capital or for
himself?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object. He can't
speak for Thane Ritchie.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
The principals of Clockwork that you
mentioned earlier were Mr. Ritchie and
Mr. Rretschmar, is that correct?
A.
No.
Q.
I'm sorry. Mr. Discala?
A.
Mr. Discala is a principal of
Clockwork, yes.
Q.
Do you know who any other principals
were?
A.
Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: At which time?
MR. FREVOLA: And how does he know?
MS. STILLMAN: He can tell you who he -- let
me think this through.
MS. APRILL: Let me start with a yes or no
question.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077490
67
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. STILLMAN: Okay.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know who all the principals of
Clockwork were?
A.
All, no.
MS. APRILL: And you were about to say?
MS. STILLMAN: I was going to ask you what
time frame, too.
MS. APRILL: In October of 2009.
MS. STILLMAN: In October of 2009, okay.
Your answer is still no?
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
What is a principal is the first
question. So the answer is no, I don't know all.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you see any sworn statements or
depositions in the files that you examined at
Mr. Rothstein's office?
A.
I don't know that I did.
Q.
Does that mean that you didn't?
A.
I mean to say I recall seeing only
pleadings. There may have been other things in
the file, but I don't recall reading them.
Q.
When you say you don't recall reading
them --
Madison Deposition Sorvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077491
68
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
I'm certain I didn't read them. It
doesn't mean they weren't there.
Q.
I understand you didn't read the whole
file. In the time frame, you surely didn't. But
I am interested in determining what was made
available for your examination.
So you don't believe there was any
deposition transcripts or you do believe they were
there?
A.
I don't know.
Q.
Do you know if there were any -- were
these documents in folders or some you said were
bound, punched on the top?
A.
The only file I saw was similar to what
you have there, which is basically -- maybe it was
an eight-and-a-half by eleven, two-hole punch with
things, pleadings in it, for example.
Q.
Was it tabs the way I've got these
numbered tabs between pleadings?
A.
I don't recall.
Q.
Were there any witness interviews, any
folders with witness' names on them?
A.
Not that I saw.
Q.
Again, I'm not asking you if you read
them, I'm just saying do you recall if they were
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077492
69
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
there?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you see any files that contained
case law, research?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you see any handwritten notes,
anything handwritten?
A.
Other than the manifest?
Q.
Other than the manifest.
A.
Other than the manifest, no, which was
not, by the way, in the file.
Q.
Mr. Rothstein produced that to you
separately?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Was that after you looked at the file?
A.
I believe so, yes.
Q.
Did he show you any newspaper articles
or internet news articles?
A.
No.
Q.
Did he show you -- you said he showed
you no photos at all, right?
A.
No photos at all other than Charlie
Crist, John McCain on the wall.
Q.
Didn't have Jeffrey Epstein on the
wall?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077493
70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
No, I don't think, not that I would
know what he looked like.
MS. STILLMAN: I was going to say do you even
know what he looks like.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did Mr. Rothstein describe the return
he anticipated from this structured settlement
investment that he discussed with you and your
client?
You mean internal return?
Q.
Yes.
A.
Yes, he discussed it because
MS. STILLMAN: Just did he discuss it.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
What did he say about it?
A.
Well, I asked him, for example, how he
could be -- that whether he had contingent fee
cases, for example, and the impact of that
question on the structured settlement. So I
inquired about his relationship, if you will, to
the plaintiff and to the split that related to the
investor, and particularly whether he, you know,
reduced his fee accordingly.
Q.
How did he answer that?
A.
He said that he, I recall, he said he
Madison Deposition Secvices•70 W Madison 14th FLiChicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077494
71
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
did not reduce his fee accordingly or that it was
between he and his plaintiff. He got the
plaintiffs to agree that he would be paid whatever
he was paid up-front.
Q.
Did he give you some -- any numbers
whatsoever about any -- was there any particular
settlement that he said that was being offered and
how much money he was looking to raise?
A.
Perspectively?
Q.
Yes.
A.
No. We did not discuss current
Scott Rothstein and I never discussed current
prospective deal in terms of what he would get or
otherwise. He discussed in the past what other
cases he had been involved with, yes.
Q.
Did he discuss any deal where an
investment of $18 million would yield $30 million
in a short
A.
Not that I recall from Scott, no.
Q.
Subsequent to your meeting with Scott
Rothstein, were you made aware of any specific
settlement that he invited your clients to invest
in or that A.J. Discala -- whether he said A.J.
Discala --
MS. STILLMAN: If you learned it from
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077495
72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Rothstein, not if you learned it in a privileged
communication from your client.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I did not learn of such things from
Scott Rothstein.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you learn it from any nonclient of
yours, any specific settlements?
A.
No.
Q.
So I'm clear, as we sit here today,
you're not aware -- well, did you ever become
aware of any specific settlement, again with a
dollar amount disclosed, that was offered to your
clients as an investment?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection, if he learned about
it from his clients or in a privileged
communication. You didn't qualify it.
MS. APRILL: All right.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
It's qualified now, I guess, by your
lawyer. I guess she's telling you not to answer
otherwise.
MS. STILLMAN: in other words, if you only
learned about it --
BY THE WITNESS:
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077496
73
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
From a client?
MS. STILLMAN: Right.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No. The answer is no. I think the
question --
MS. STILLMAN: The answer is no, as
qualified.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
So you never did any business with
Scott Rothstein in 2009, right?
A.
No, nor did we represent clients that
did.
Q.
The D3 Capital Club that was discussed
a bit earlier
A.
Yes.
Q.
-- do you know what the name derives
from, if D3 represents three people?
MS. STILLMAN: If you know from a
nonprivileged communication.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't know.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q•
Did you ever meet Doug Von Allmen?
A.
I've never met Doug Von Allmen.
Q.
Did you ever meet anyone named Von
Madison Deposition Services•70 a Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077497
74
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allmon?
A.
I've never met anyone, that I recall.
Q.
Let me just ask you about some of these
people who may have been involved.
John Antilic (sic), do you know him?
A.
I do not.
Q.
Chris Pedaris (sic)?
A.
Yes.
Q.
How do you know Chris Pedaris?
A.
Chris Pedaris a principal of Clockwork
Capital and I had occasion to meet him after Scott
Rothstein was arrested.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know when Scott was arrested,
approximately?
A.
I want to say November, first week in
November 2009.
Q.
Do you know how you learned he was
arrested?
MS. STILLMAN: If you learned separate and
apart from privileged conversation.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I think I saw Scott Rothstein was
arrested maybe on the internet or the press or
something.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th Pi.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077498
75
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1C
:1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you ever meet a person named
Michael Szafranski?
A.
1 did.
Q.
Who is Michael Szafranski?
A.
He worked for a company by the name of
Onyx, and we met at Bova when we were drinking.
He was there.
Q.
When you say a company, do you know if
Onyx is a hedge fund?
A.
I have no idea what Onyx is.
Q.
You met him, this is the day -- later
in the day after you met with Scott?
A.
Exactly.
Q.
Did Scott introduce you?
A.
No. I think Thane may have introduced
or A.J.
Q.
Did you know what role he had, if any,
with respect to the Rothstein settlement,
structured settlement investments?
MS. STILLMAN: If you know that outside of
privileged conversation with Thane or A.J.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No, I don't know outside of a
privileged conversation.
US
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077499
76
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did he speak to you other than to say
hello and where he worked?
A.
Chitchat, not connected to what -- not
connected to structured settlements or Scott
Rothstein, per se.
Q.
Did he ever -- so he did not tell you
that he was --
A.
What he was doing.
Q.
-- was doing on the settlements?
A.
Correct.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein tell you there was
any independent verifiers of the investments?
A.
Yes, I believe he did.
Q.
Can you tell me what he said with
respect to that subject?
A.
He would hire somebody to verify that
the money was in the bank. The basic premise was
that the transaction would be funded by defendant
into an escrow account, if you will, at the banks,
somebody would go on behalf of the, quote,
"investor," whoever that might be, and confirm
that the money was, in fact, in the bank accounts.
Q.
This somebody was hired by Scott
Rothstein, is that what he said?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•F:312-379-0702
EFTA01077500
77
2
3
4
5
6
1
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
No, I don't believe so, that somebody
was hired by the investor, or at least that's what
I recall.
Q.
Was that description provided to you
during your face-to-face meeting with Scott?
A.
I believe so, yes, yes, inexplicably,
yes.
Q.
Scott never mentioned that Szafranski
was any verifier, did he?
A.
Not that I recall, no.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein ever mention the
name of an individual named Michael Fisten to you?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Do you know Barry Bekkedam?
A.
I do not.
Q.
What about the name Ballamor Capital,
was that name brought to your attention?
A.
I've heard that name, yes.
Q.
Do you know what Ballamor Capital is?
MS. STILLMAN: As long as you know separate
and apart from what you've been told in privileged
communication.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Ballamor Capital and maybe even Barry
Bekkedam I met I believe when Scott Rothstein was
Madison Deposition Secvices•70 M Madison 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077501
78
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
:9
20
21
22
23
24
25
returning from Morocco in early November.
Q.
After things happened?
A.
Exactly.
Q.
After Scott was -- before he was
arrested but after it was known that his firm was
suffering from some problems?
A.
Yes, exactly.
Q.
How did you refer to that, what
happened to his firm?
A.
Well, in terms of what the firm
the
firm imploded, is that what you mean?
Q.
it.
Yes, for a shorthand way to describe
You say you learned of Ballamor Capital
after that?
A.
Or Barry. Maybe I met Barry even once
briefly. He's Ballamor Capital. The name rings a
bell.
Q•
Do you know where you were?
A.
At the time, yes.
Q.
Where?
A.
I was in Ft. Lauderdale.
Q.
Were you in Ft. Lauderdale on business
related to the Rothstein matters?
A.
Yes.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077502
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Can you tell me what that business was?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection. If there was no
nonlawyer there, he can't testify to that --
excuse me, if there was no nonclient there.
MS. APRILL: Barry was not a client, right?
MS. STILLMAN: Was he at the meeting?
THE WITNESS: He came and went. I mean, I
met Barry --
MS. STILLMAN: Why don't we determine who was
at the meeting.
THE WITNESS: I met several people and it's
probably not privileged. Let me take this one.
MS. STILLMAN: You're not the one to make the
decision.
THE WITNESS: Let me tell you who I met -
MS. STILLMAN: Say who you met first.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I met George Levin. I met Barry
Bekkedam, probably. He is a tall guy, I think. I
met Jack Samat -- Jack Somoni, something. I met
my partner, Ivan Harris, my litigation partner.
Chris Pedaris was there. A.J. Discala was there.
Dean Kretschmar was there and another guy whose
name escapes me.
MS. STILLMAN: So those are the ground rules.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•F:312-379-0702
EFTA01077503
80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
You can talk about any meeting at which George,
Barry, Jack, and Dean, to the extent that he was
there personally and not in his capacity in any
relationship to Clockwork.
MR. FREVOLA: My concern is early on from
what I know there were times when there were
people trying to figure out what was happening
where they were seeking joint legal advice even
though they might not have ultimately wound up
becoming clients.
THE WITNESS: True.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
So let me ask this question: The
meeting with these people, was there an attorney
there who was talking to them about their legal
rights?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And they were seeking counsel?
A.
Yes, exactly.
MS. STILLMAN: Then I would take the position
all of those meetings.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did that occur shortly after Scott
returned from Morocco, is that the timing?
A.
In fact, he was landing. It was the
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077504
81
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
day he landed was the day of that meeting.
Q.
Do you know where the meeting occurred?
A.
It was in George Levin's office
building but not in his office. There was an
adjacent room, empty adjacent room across the way.
To say it was a meeting was probably an
overstatement.
Q.
A gathering?
A.
A gathering, exactly.
Q.
Did you meet Frank Preve?
A.
Yes. He was also
Q.
At that group?
A.
-- at that group.
Q.
Is he part of Banyon Capital
Investment?
A.
I'm not sure.
Q.
Is that what George Levin's business
was?
A.
I think that's right, yes.
Q.
Did you meet Preve at any other time
before that?
A.
I may have met him at Scott Rothstein's
office briefly.
Q.
Is that on the day that you described?
A.
Right. In other words, while this is
Madison Deposition Services•70 ➢i Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077505
82
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
postdisaster, the earlier October meeting he may
have been there. I think he was, in fact. I
think I was introduced to him.
Q.
So when you say he may have been there,
do you mean he may have just -- you might have met
him briefly --
A.
Shook his hand sitting in the waiting
room, correct.
Q.
So did he ever describe to you
anything, Preve, I mean, about the investment that
Scott described?
MS. STILLMAN: In this meeting?
MS. APRILL: No.
MS. STILLMAN: Separate and apart from this
gathering.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
When you met him the day at Scott's
office before the implosion?
A.
Before the implosion, not that I
recall, no.
Q.
Adam Fisher, was he there?
A.
That's the other guy who I couldn't
remember.
Q•
Did you know Adam Fisher before that?
A.
I believe I had spoken to him on the
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077506
83
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
phone.
Q.
Going back to Scott's meeting since
obviously that is a focus, when you were there
with Mr. Ritchie and A.J. Discala --
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object to the
extent that A.J. left the meeting, if you recall.
He was not there for the whole meeting.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Well, you said you were only in one
meeting in Scott's office one time?
A.
Yes.
Q.
So when I say the meeting with Scott,
that's it.
A.
Although keep in mind -- let's go back
to the earlier testimony. We were all there.
Scott and A.J. left maybe separately, I don't
remember, and then Scott came back. Whether A.J.
came back, I don't recall.
Q.
At the meeting with Mr. Rothstein in
October?
A.
It was one day, call it an hour in
length, but broken up through a stretch of time.
MS. STILLMAN: She's just trying to get the
time frame. He testified late September, early
October.
Madison Deposition Setvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077507
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
All right. Did Scott tell you that he
had 18 other girls lined up to bring actions
against Jeffrey Epstein?
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did he tell you he had any number of
young women lined up to bring actions?
A.
Against Jeffrey Epstein personally?
Q.
Yee.
A.
He had lots of cases lined up, cases
against lots of people. The numbers against
Jeffrey Epstein, I don't recall.
Q.
Did he mention some of the other
defendants or soon to be defendants?
A.
I remember the name -- he mentioned the
name of a particular company. I don't recall the
name of it now. It was somebody in the supplying
juice or some such things to the government.
There was a pharmaceutical case that he
named. The exact -- it was a big pharmaceutical
manufacturer. I can speculate as to who it was
MS. STILLMAN: Don't speculate.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't recall. And a host of other
related cases, you know, not related but unrelated
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077508
85
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
'70
21
22
23
24
25
cases that Scott Rothstein was absolutely --
MS. STILLMAN: Just what he said.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did he tell you or do you remember him
saying that there were two sisters who were
victims of Mr. Epstein that were his clients or
that one of them was a client of his?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein talk in terms of
investment returns using the tranche, is that the
word?
MS. STILLMAN: T-r-a-n-c-h-e.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I do not remember him using that term,
no.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you see any police reports in the
boxes of documents?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
I know I asked you what he told you
about his investigators, but did you see anything
in the boxes, even if you didn't read them, that
appear to be investigators' reports?
A.
No, I did not. Not that I recall.
Again, I looked at pleadings.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077509
86
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
1
12
13
14
:5
16
17
18
19
2C
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did you make any copies of anything?
A.
No.
Q.
Did Mr. Rothstein tell you that he
shouldn't be showing you these files?
A.
Not that I recall, no.
Q.
Did he tell you that they were
confidential and ask you to keep them in
confidence?
A.
No.
Q.
Did he ask you to sign any kind of a
nondisclosure agreement?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you ever agree to keep what you
learned in that room confidential?
A.
Among my clients and I, but other than
that, no.
Q•
Did you meet an attorney at the firm
named David Boden?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you meet a woman, not an attorney
at the Rothstein firm called Debra Villegas?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you ever have any communication
from Debra Villegas?
A.
Not that I recall, no.
Madison Deposition services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077510
87
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
Did you ever speak to any members of
the press about Jeffrey Epstein or that there were
cases against him?
A.
Q.
If I understood before, and I'm really
not interested in the dispute there might be
between Mr. Ritchie and Mr. Kretschmar and Mercata
Justa, but Mercata Justa, did they invest any
money with Scott Rothstein?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm going to object. First of
all, which Mercata Justa are you talking about?
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Is there more than one?
A.
There are. There's two.
Q.
I've heard you mention Mercata Justa.
I have reason to believe that Mercata Justa
invested some $5 million on October 23rd, 2009.
I'm wondering if you're aware of that?
MS. STILLMAN: To the extent that you know
anything about an investment through a privileged
communication, then I'm not going to let you
answer.
If you have independent knowledge of
any investment by a Mercata Justa of $5 million,
then you can answer.
•
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicapo IL 60602.P:312-379-C70'z
EFTA01077511
38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
13
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Nonprivileged communication would be in
the form of what?
MS. STILLMAN: Let's go outside.
(WHEREUPON, a recess was had.)
MS. STILLMAN: Can we hear the question back
again?
MS. APRILL: Can you read it back?
(WHEREUPON, the record was read
by the reporter as requested.)
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Mercata Justa Partners invested
$5 million or so, I think, into D3.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know if that money was placed in
the control of Scott Rothstein?
s.
Q.
And was that money lost to Scott
Rothstein?
A.
I'm sorry, it was placed in the bank,
TO Bank.
Q.
Was it ever returned to the Mercata
Justa partners?
A.
Not that I know of.
Q•
Do you know if there is any lawsuit to
Madison Deposition Scrvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077512
89
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
seek to recover it?
A.
I don't know.
Q.
Did you ever speak to an attorney at
again, maybe just in passing in the anteroom of
Scott Rothstein's office -- named Cara Holmes?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Did you have any contact with any
attorneys from the firm of Clifford, Chance --
A.
No.
Q.
-- again regarding Rothstein business?
A.
No.
Q.
Have you ever heard of Chris Roman?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Jeff Berman?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
Is Matthew Sperry a Morgan, Lewis
lawyer who worked with you?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did he provide any services in
connection with the Rothstein matter? Did he do
any work, do you know?
MS. STILLMAN: I'm not going -- I am going to
assert the privilege. Again, what team Michael
did or did not put together for --
MS. APRILL: I'm trying to avoid taking
Madison. Deposition. Services•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077513
90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Matthew Sperry's deposition.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Bob Mazeo, is that someone that you
know?
A.
I've spoken to Bob, yes. I've never
met him face to face.
Q.
He is not a client of yours, is he?
A.
I would consider Bob to be in-house
counsel to
Q.
Is Mimeo, Sawyer, Bradham a law firm,
do you know?
A.
I don't know.
Q.
He is an attorney?
A.
My impression, he is the attorney and
was in-house lawyer in the case at the time for
Clockwork Capital Advisors. He represented that.
Q•
Elizabeth Freedland, do you know who
she is?
A.
I do.
Q.
Can you tell me who she is?
A.
She's a young woman who at the time of
the Rothstein-related matters was A.J. Discala's
assistant.
Q.
Do you know if she continues to work
for him?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077514
91
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
I believe she does not.
Q.
Did you have any communications with
any bankers at TD Bank when you were -- at the
period of time you were communicating with Scott
Rothstein?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you ever
well, have you ever
seen something called a pitch book that was
prepared in connection with the structured
settlements?
MS. STILLMAN: Was it prepared by Scott
Rothstein?
MS. APRILL: I don't know. That's why I'm
asking.
MS. STILLMAN: To the extent --
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Not outside of a privileged
communication.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you ever see any written materials
generated by Scott Rothstein describing the
investment he discussed with you?
A.
No.
Q.
Did you ever see a lock letter from TD
Bank?
Madison Deposition Sorvices'70 W Madison :4th FL.Chicago IL 60602'P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077515
92
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if it was authentic?
A.
I don't know.
Q.
Do you know who showed it to you?
A.
A client.
Q.
Have you ever met a Rothstein attorney,
formerly of the Rothstein firm, Ros Nurek?
A.
I have not.
Q.
I am going to ask you about the
documents that actually your attorney was good
enough to produce to me prior to today. There is
a set here, when you stepped out for a minute I
put them in date order because that's how my set
is and it makes it a little easier for me.
MS. STILLMAN: The trouble is some of those
things that are going to show up early may have
been attachments to later documents. That's why
you were given them --
MS. APRILL: We'll be literally on the same
page. The e-mails are mostly the only ones.
Well, that's how they are, so that's how I choose
to use them to question him.
MS. STILLMAN: Okay.
THE WITNESS: As you wish.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077516
93
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
If you tell me they occurred at some
other time, so be it. Rather than have you mark
these separately, maybe we should make it a
composite because it is not that large.
MS. STILLMAN: It's your record.
MS. APRILL: I'm going to show him documents
and some of them we may not attach at all. I will
ask her to mark those that I've deemed
appropriate.
MS. STILLMAN: Let the record reflect that
some of these documents that have now been
reordered were, in fact, attachments to e-mails
that come date order much later. I'm particularly
looking at the first document in the pile.
They're going to be confusing to the witness but
so be it.
MS. APRILL: I will try not to do that,
actually. I looked at things that said they were
an attachment and kept them together.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
In front of you I put a document that
has RRA letterhead.
Q
Can you just describe it by date?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-9102
EFTA01077517
94
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
It's dated October 14th. The first
two, case number RRAG 425, and it is purported to
be signed by Scott Rothstein.
Q.
Do you know what RRAG 425 refers to?
A.
No.
Q.
Was that term ever used by Scott
Rothstein to describe a case?
A.
Not to me.
Q.
Do you recall seeing this before?
A.
This letter?
Q.
Yes.
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know how it came to be sent to
you?
A.
I believe it was sent via e-mail.
Q.
Do you know why it was sent?
A.
It was part of the package of things
that
well, actually, I'm not sure I know where
it came from, whether Scott sent it or my client
sent it.
MR. QUINLAN: Could I interrupt with a
comment and a question, please?
MS. APRILL: Yes.
MR. QUINLAN: The comment is just that I
still don't have a copy of the documents and I
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077518
95
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
guess the thing of greatest interest to me, and I
will just pose it as a question to you, Susan, is
Brad Edwards mentioned in any of these documents?
MS. APRILL: Not to my knowledge. I don't
know.
MS. STILLMAN: I don't remember the name Brad
Edwards appearing in these documents.
MS. APRILL: I do not recall coming across
that.
MR. QUINLAN: Okay. Obviously -- maybe that
is the not so obvious -- but that is the matter of
the greatest concern to me in the moment is
whether his name is in the documents. We're still
working on getting a copy.
MS. APRILL: Since we are putting all this on
the record, I should tell you no one requested
them of us until late yesterday. It's certainly
not an intentional effort to keep you from seeing
them.
MS. STILLMAN: I don't recall the name Brad
Edwards appearing
MR. QUINLAN:
intending to make
MS. APRILL:
in any of this stuff.
Okay. Susan, I was not
any accusations.
I understand. When you read the
record later, it is cold paper and no one knows
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077519
96
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
why anything came up, so that's fine.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
The next document that should be in
front of you is -- what is it titled?
A.
"Rosenstein, Rosenfeld, Adler Authority
to Represent Contract of Employment."
Q.
If you will look at the next two
documents after that?
A.
Do you want me to list the name again?
Q.
Yes.
A.
This is titled, "Confidential
Settlement Agreement and General Release."
Q.
Can you go to the next one?
A.
The next one is called, "Acknowledgment
of Assignment Purchase of Settlement Proceeds."
Q.
Do you know if these were all sent to
you together?
A.
I believe so, yes.
Q.
Do you know --
A.
By that I mean to say that I don't know
who gave them to me.
Q.
Do you know why they were sent to you?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection, given his testimony
that he doesn't know who gave them to him, I'm
concerned that if it came from a client, that's
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077520
97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
going to involve attorney-client privilege.
MS. APRILL: I have to say that I don't quite
understand. These were produced to me out of what
I assume is a much larger file than the 18
documents that were given to me.
Every one was a PDF. If a PDF came, it
was sent with its e-mail. If these came with the
e-mails, as you seem to think they were, there are
no e-mails from your client as far as I know or if
they are, I'm not sure if that isn't waiver of the
privilege because you gave them to me.
MS. STILLMAN: To the extent there was a
communication from the client where the client
copied Rothstein or any other nonclient, then that:
is a waiver and I'm not asserting the privilege.
Look, for example, if you can look at
documents that we produced where clearly clients
are involved but also Rothstein is involved or
somebody else is copied, I cannot, as an officer
of the court assert the privilege.
MS. APRILL: I did not take any apart from
anything as far as the way they were sent to me.
They were sent in separate PDFs.
MS. STILLMAN: I haven't denied him. If he
wants to say these were sent by a client and they
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077521
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
were sent in one of these communications, then
that's fair game but why the client sent it to .
may not be.
MS. APRILL: Let me go a different direction.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Go to the next document. Is that
October 21st, 2009?
A.
11:O2 a.m.
MS. STILLMAN: Which is the next one. Let me
find it. I have it in the order we produced.
MS. APRILL: I'm going do ask you to mark --
actually I've got a copy, too, so why don't you
mark this one as No. 2.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 2, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
What is this?
A.
This purports to be an e-mail from A.J.
Discala at Clockwork to a cast of characters
including myself regarding PPM draft.
Q.
What is the PPM draft, if you know,
that is referred to?
A.
It is a draft of private placement
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077522
99
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
memorandum.
Q.
Do you recall receiving this?
A.
This e-mail?
Q.
Yes.
A.
No.
Q.
Do you know if this e-mail was produced
from your own e-mail directory at the firm?
A.
The one we're looking at now, this
version?
Q.
Yes.
A.
Yes, it was.
Q.
Do you see in the first sentence where
it says, "Guys, just an update. We will have a
draft ppm from Morgan Lewis by this Friday"?
Did you or any of the other attorneys
at Morgan Lewis, to your knowledge, prepare a
draft private placement memorandum that is
referred to here?
A.
Well, this is prospective comment, so
we will have a draft.
Q.
Right.
A.
Whether subsequently a draft is
ultimately produced?
Q.
Right.
A.
I don't recall.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077523
100
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
If a draft was produced, would there be
any reason you would not have turned it over with
respect to this deposition?
MS. STILLMAN: Objection, calls for
speculation. If there was a nonprivileged
document produced that was responsive to your
subpoena, we would have turned it over.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Were you the person who would have
did you ever prepare a draft private placement
memorandum in connection with a Rothstein
investment?
MS. STILLMAN: Wait a minute.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
That was shown to anybody outside of
your client group?
Not that I'm aware of.
Q.
Do you know if you received any from an
attorney from Rothstein or from some other firm
that you made comments on?
MS. STILLMAN: And that was not a co-counsel
or joint counsel in a privileged context.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I think the answer to that is no, I did
not.
Madison Deposition Services'70 M Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077524
101
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
It says here, "I want to thank Michael
and his team and Bob for working so diligently."
Do you see where it says that?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know who Bob is in that
reference?
A.
I believe it is Mazeo.
Q.
Do you know what is the meaning of the
term at the end of that communication where it
says, "I think the team has done a great job with
holding it all together."
Do you know what "holding it
altogether" is referring to?
A.
I do not.
Q.
The next document should be is it
October 22nd at 9:01 a.m.?
A.
Yes, it is.
Q.
Now, on the second page of this
document, it says something is redacted.
Did you do the redacting of the
document?
A.
I did not.
Q.
Was it redacted because it contains a
privileged communication?
Madison Deposition Scrvsces•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077525
102
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. STILLMAN: Yes. All redactions were due
to privilege. I think I put that -- I may be
wrong, I thought I put that in my transmittal to
you.
MS. APRILL: Perhaps you did, but since it
doesn't have the header on it, I don't know if it
is an attachment or if it is another e-mail.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know?
A.
I do not know.
MS. STILLMAN: They would have been an
e-mail. It would have been on a separate page if
it was an attachment
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know Jay Menton?
A.
: do.
Q.
Is he an attorney?
A.
He is not.
Q.
But he is employed at Ritchie Capital
Management? That is your client, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know who
is
A.
No.
Q.
Do you know if A.J. Discala had more
than one e-mail at that time?
Madison Deposition Services•70 14 Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077526
103
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
I know he has more than one e-mail. I
am not familiar with this as an A.J. Discala
e-mail address.
Q.
I'm trying to clarify something. Is
there anyone that received this e-mail that we're
looking at that is not -- was not a client of
yours?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Who?
A.
Dean Kretschmar.
Q.
I thought there was some reference
earlier that Dean Kretschmar when he wears his hat
as a principal of Clockwork --
A.
This is not as a principal of
Clockwork.
Q.
In that case, when Dean Kretschmar
let's mark this one.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 3, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Referring now to Exhibit 3 that you
described initially, in this document, there is a
reference to right in the middle of the page --
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077527
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. STILLMAN: Page 1?
MS. APRILL: Yes, the first page.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
-- from Jay Menton to Dean. I guess it
is the second e-mail of the three on the string.
Q.
Where he writes:
"Still awaiting the following per
attorney requests detail on the $8 million
that he is supposed to be getting refunded
by Razorback."
Do you know who he is that is supposed
to be getting refunded by Razorback? Do you know
who that refers to?
MR. FREVOLA: How would he know?
MS. STILLMAN: It doesn't make a difference.
He may know. We have to find out.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
I don't know.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know why this was produced to
us, this response to our subpoena?
A.
No.
MS. STILLMAN: Why it was produced is -- wait
a minute.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077528
105
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. APRILL: Well, let me ask it a different
way.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
I am going to show you the subpoena
again and ask you if you know which of these
requests this responds to. There are different
categories. I think they all contain reference to
Jeffrey Epstein.
MS. STILLMAN: Let's go outside.
(WHEREUPON, a recess was had.)
MS. STILLMAN: Back on the record. Let me
say we have reviewed this document and it is not
technically within the specific parameters of your
subpoena.
MS. APRILL: Okay. Then I don't have to
inquire any more about it because I thought it had
something to do with an Epstein settlement.
MS. STILLMAN: No, it has nothing to do with
Epstein.
MS. APRILL: Let's move ahead, then.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
The next one is October 22nd, 2009 at
2:49. Is that what you're showing?
A.
It is.
Q.
Now, this one does have attached to it
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•CPicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077529
106
2
3
4
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
a second page. Do you have that, too?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Titled, "Acknowledgment"?
A.
I do.
Q.
Can you just describe this, for the
record, the date? Well, I guess the date, you
confirmed it, so you don't have to describe it
again.
Do you know where it says, "Scott's
cell," what that refers to?
A.
No.
Q.
Do you know if there is something
redacted prior to that in the sentence?
MS. STILLMAN: If anything was redacted, it
would be stamped redacted.
MS. APRILL: All right.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you see where it says, "Please,"
with upper case letters "call Scott and verify the
wire"?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if that was referring to
Scott Rothstein?
A.
The Scott in this question?
Q.
Yes.
Madison Deposition Services'70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077530
1C7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know the purpose of the
acknowledgment that was attached to this e-mail
there in front of you?
MS. STILLMAN: If you know outside of the
privilege.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No, I don't know outside of the
privileged communication.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know if it was prepared by the
Rothstein firm?
A.
I don't know.
MS. APRILL: Why don't you make that
Exhibit 4.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 4, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
The next document that was produced, at
least in date order, starts off -- what is the
date of yours?
A.
October 22nd, 3:30 p.m. is what I have
next.
Madison Deposition Services•70 w Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077531
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
I probably stuck it to something else.
Who is
if you know?
A.
Lou Z. Hill.
Q.
Is he a client of your firm?
Q.
This particular document, let's mark
this as the next number.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 5, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q•
You said Lou was a lawyer. What
relationship, if any, does it have to your client
group, Palm Capital Advisors?
A.
To my client group? Well, he
represented a counter party on the opposite side.
Q.
Do you know who?
A.
Dean Kretschmar.
Q.
Do you know where this lawyer is based?
Q.
Do you know if he prepared any private
placement memorandum?
MS. STILLMAN: If you know outside --
BY THE WITNESS:
Madison. Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-C702
EFTA01077532
1.09
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Not that I'm aware of.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Now, there are several redactions. If
you know, were those just e-mails as opposed to
attachments?
I don't know.
Q.
The next document -- there is one,
let's see, do you have this one? The date I'm
looking for on here the one where the top e-mail
is October 22nd at -- well, it is 1447, so it
would be 2:47 p.m. You must have it because I got
it from you.
MS. STILLMAN: I think it was attached,
actually, to something.
MS. APRILL: Some of these are strings and
they have repeats as well.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
You can look at that one
MS. STILLMAN: Here it is. It is actually
attached to Exhibit 2 that I have.
MS. APRILL: What I would like to do is I
would like to, if it is supposed to be together
with Exhibit 2, alter it, amend it.
MS. STILLMAN: They're both pages one, so
they could have been stapled.
Madison Deposition servicos•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago iL 60602'S:312-379-0702
EFTA01077533
110
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. APRILL: Let's make it 6. "It is really
a contents thing. It's not a verification of what
e-mail came first.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 6, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
You have Exhibit 6?
Q.
My question for you is: Do you recall
seeing this e-mail before that has been marked as
Exhibit 6, actually two e-mails?
Q.
Do you recall receiving a communication
from Scott Rothstein on or about October 22nd
where he uses this reference that his clients are
threatening to fire him and "love you, Scott" at
the bottom?
I do not recall.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein communicate with
you by telephone at all during the days of October
21st, 22nd, and 23rd?
He did not.
Q.
The next document that I wanted to show
Madison Deposition Services.70 W Madison 14th FL.Chrcago IL 00602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077534
111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you has a box on the bottom or what looks like a
box. If you could, for the record, say the date
of this one?
A.
October 23rd, 2009 at 1:05 p.m.
Q.
Do you recall receiving this e-mail
from Scott Rothstein? It is Scott Rothstein to
Legamaro what I am reading?
A.
Yes.
Q.
You do?
A.
I do.
Q.
Earlier you mentioned you had a
communication with Mr. Rothstein about whether
court approval was needed for the settlements, I
believe?
A.
Generally, yes.
Q.
Do you remember if this was his
response to you or any part of it?
A.
It was, in fact, his response.
Q.
Do you know whether -- it has a
with nothing next to it.
Did you understand that to be just
careless typing?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you see where it says, "More info to
follow"?
11411
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077535
112
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
i6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
him?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if you got more info from
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know if that has been produced
in this group of documents?
A.
I think so, yes.
MS. STILLMAN: Are you marking this?
MS. APRILL: Yes.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 7, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
is October 23rd at 1:27?
A.
Yes.
Q.
The next document that I'm looking at
Have you ever seen that before?
A.
Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: Counsel, just remember, I said
that this stuff was broken up.
MS. APRILL: Right.
MS. STILLMAN: These were the attachments?
MS. APRILL: You mean the big documents, yes.
MS. STILLMAN: These were the attachments.
Madison Deposition Servlces•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602.P;312-3/9-0702
EFTA01077536
113
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. APRILL: That's why I have them over to
the side and I haven't marked them because I was
hoping there would be epiphany among one of us.
Thank you for that.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
So the documents, the acknowledgment of
assignment, let's look at the documents that you
have. There was a letter that I showed you at the
very beginning of this.
MS. STILLMAN: Are you making the e-mail at
1:27 Exhibit 8?
MS. APRILL: Yes, but I want to attach
everything to it. I didn't mark the others for
that reason.
MS. STILLMAN: Okay.
MS. APRILL: Let's make that Exhibit 8.
MS. STILLMAN: The e-mail?
MS. APRILL: The e-mail is Exhibit 8, but I
would like to make everything that came with it
Exhibit 8.
MS. STILLMAN: Yes.
MS. APRILL: Which includes a cover letter
that you described previously in your testimony
from Scott Rothstein dated October 1st, 2009, and
an authority to represent contract of employment
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.D:312-319-0702
EFTA01077537
114
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
with the Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler firm and a
confidential settlement agreement and general
release and an acknowledgment --
THE WITNESS: Yes, acknowledgment.
MS. APRILL: Assignment purchase of
settlement proceeds. Thank you for that,
explaining that. That all goes together. That
will be composite Exhibit 8.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 8, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you recall examining the documents
that have been marked as Exhibit 8, composite
exhibit?
Q.
Upon receipt of them or soon after?
A.
fes.
Q.
Do you know if they originated
if
you look at the top e-mail, the bottom of the
chain on Page 2 is Debra Villegas to Scott
Rothstein.
Do you see that?
A.
I do.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicapo IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077538
115
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q.
The next e-mail after that in time is
Scott Rothstein to Preve and Szafranski, do you
see that?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And then Preve to A.J. and then A.J. to
you and Ms. Perdue?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you understand that these documents
were originated with the Rothstein firm?
A.
Yes, I would presume so, yes.
Q.
And do you know if this concerned
did Scott tell you that they coded their documents
with these G dash letters?
A.
No.
Q.
When you got it, did you have any
question about what G 425 was?
A.
No, not really.
Q.
So he didn't describe to you any sort
of security measures to protect the identity of
the plaintiffs?
A.
No.
Q.
If you look at the attachment, that
confidential settlement agreement, I asked you
earlier I think if you knew who Marsha Foreman and
the Elite Delivery Systems were?
Madison Deposition Setvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077539
116
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
:3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Right.
Q.
Do you know if this
if you go to the
next page after the one you're looking at where it
says "consideration," there is a paragraph there.
A.
Yes.
Q.
It says, "$30 million." Is that the
amount of money that was being raised by Rothstein
to fund this settlement?
A.
No.
Q.
Do you see further down the page still
under consideration where it says in bold print
that "there will be six equal monthly installments
in the amount of $5 million commencing on
November 14, 2009"?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Is it your understanding that these
documents were sent to substantiate the
transaction wherein this plaintiff was to receive
that settlement?
MS. STILLMAN: You're asking what Scott
Rothstein's intention was?
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
What did you understand they were being
sent to you for?
A.
They were being sent to
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077540
117
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. STILLMAN: Do you know why Scott
Rothstein sent, not what your client told you.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Why Scott Rothstein sent them? Scott
Rothstein did not send them, as you can tell.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
They went through a chain but people in
his firm?
A.
Do I know why Scott Rothstein --
right -- but it started on Debra Villegas on the
16th of October.
Q.
Right.
A.
Maybe I did or didn't meet Scott
Rothstein by this point. I don't recall exactly
when I met him. So why did he sent them? I don't
know why he sent them.
Q.
Were they of use to you in whatever
work you were doing?
A.
Yes, they were necessary for what
MS. STILLMAN: Wait a minute. This was not
sent to you directly by Scott Rothstein.
THE WITNESS: He was copied.
MS. STILLMAN: He was copied?
THE WITNESS: Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: But by a client?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077541
118
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE WITNESS: Yes.
MS. STILLMAN: But why you used them is
privileged.
THE WITNESS: I suppose.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
You recall getting them and you used
them in some fashion but you can't testify about
why. Well, let me ask a different question. I
understand.
Was it in connection to whatever
services you were providing with respect to an
investment by one or more of your clients in a
Rothstein product?
MS. STILLMAN: I will let him testify if he
saw those in connection with a Rothstein
transaction. But the why -- which I think is what
you're asking.
MS. APRILL: Yes, it is.
MS. STILLMAN: So you can answer that
question which is did you receive these in
connection with a Rothstein transaction involving
your clients.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Remotely, yes, third level removed they
involved my clients.
Madison Deposition Secvices•70 II Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077542
119
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you request these documents?
MS. STILLMAN: From who, Rothstein?
MS. APRILL: From Rothstein's firm even if it
was conveyed through others.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
So when your client -- well, in this
capacity,
, you're treating as
your client?
A.
In this capacity? Well, he was my
client, but he was probably sending it
who
knows why. A.J. sent them, but it was
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
He sent it you to and another lawyer at
this firm and he says, "Let me know if you need
anything else"?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Which leads me to believe that you
needed these?
A.
Yes.
Q.
So you did need these documents?
A.
Somebody did, yes.
N.S. STILLMAN: Somebody did.
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077543
120
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2.2
23
24
25
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Again, do you know why these were
turned over to us, because they don't appear to
have anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein, from my
reading? I'm not wanting to belabor that but that
matters to me.
Did that have something to do with
Jeffrey Epstein's --
MS. STILLMAN: I will tell you, we took to be
on the safe side because these relationships can
be very attenuated. If they involve the deals
with Rothstein, we produced the documents.
Whether this specific document -- we
can't always be sure whether it related to Epstein
or not.
MS. APRILL: All right.
MS. STILLMAN: So that's why we erred on the
side of including it.
MS. APRILL: That's fine.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
I'm just trying to determine if you
thought this had something to do -- in particular
to do with Defendant Jeffrey Epstein?
A.
Not that I know of.
Q.
That's why I was asking that.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077544
121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Did you receive other documents similar
in nature for other settlements that look like the
ones we have attached to Exhibit 8 that are part
of Exhibit 8?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
This is the one that says we're
convinced?
A.
Yes.
MS. APRILL: So I would like this one marked
as Exhibit 9.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 9, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Sir, have you ever -- can you describe
Exhibit 9 so the record is clear?
A.
It is an e-mail from me to A.J., Betsy
copying Scott Rothstein and Thane Ritchie, dated
October 23rd, 2009 at 1:52 p.m.
Q.
It begins with, "Okay we're convinced."
The text in here, was that typed by you?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know what you meant when you
said "we're convinced"?
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077545
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Do I recall exactly? No.
Q.
Generally?
A.
No.
Q.
About 25 minutes before that, the
e-mail transmitting the several documents, that is
Exhibit 8, was sent to you and one of your
colleagues here at the firm. Do you know whether
the "we're convinced" comment relates to these?
A.
I don't know.
Q.
Do you recall what you needed to be
convinced about?
A.
No.
Q.
This reference here, "May be cleaner in
the future but good enough for now," do you know
if that related to any drafting of documents?
A.
I'm betting it did.
Q.
Is Betsy Elizabeth Perdue?
A.
She is.
Q.
And Lou, I think you described before,
he was Palm Capital?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Have you had any business dealings with
Lou outside of Scott Rothstein transactions?
A.
Not at this time, no.
MS. STILLMAN: Counsel, just for the record,
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison lath FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077546
123
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you have about 25 minutes left, I think.
MS. APRILL: I'm on top of that.
MS. STILLMAN: Okay.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
The last sentence, "We figure we have
until 4 --" central standard time, is that what
that stands for?
A.
Yes.
Q.
"-- to get a wire out the door here"?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know what that refers to?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Can you tell me?
A.
It's the last time that Thane Ritchie
or an entity controlled by Thane could wire money.
Q.
Was this the $5 million that was
referred to earlier on October 23rd?
A.
I don't recall exactly how far, but
yes, there was an amount Thane Ritchie was to lend
to Dean Kretschmar.
Q.
So this has to do with the Ritchie loan
to Kretschmar to invest in D3 or D3 and the
Rothstein investment?
A.
Yes.
MS. APRILL: Now, that was Exhibit 9 and that
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077547
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
was two pages, right?
MS. STILLMAN: Yes.
MS. APRILL: Just to make sense out of this,
let me ask you to mark the next document.
MS. STILLMAN: There were two at 1:53.
MS. APRILL: I see they are both responding
to it seems to the same thing. Let's take the one
that is not from Rothstein,
MS. STILLMAN: So that is 10?
MS. APRILL: 10.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 10, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Sir, do you recognize what has been
marked as Exhibit 10?
A.
Do I recall receiving it?
Q.
Yes.
A.
No, I don't, but I recognize what it
is, yes.
Q.
This is October 23rd, 2009, 1:53 p.m.
Is that A.J. Discala?
Q.
To you and Ms. Perdue and copying
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Mad:son 14th PL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077548
125
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Rothstein and others?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Where it says, it reads, "We are good
with it" is the next word "wire" as in wire
transfer?
A.
I believe so.
Q.
"Lou had one small comment."
Do you know Lou, being the lawyer at
Palm Capital?
A.
Yes, representing Dean. Not Pa]m
Capital but Dean.
Q.
So Lou -- the fact that Lou has his
e-mail at Palm Capital, you don't understand that
to mean that he is an in-house lawyer there?
A.
No. I believe that's his personal
e-mail address.
Q.
So you feel in this transaction --
A.
He was representing Dean, yes, as a
lawyer.
Q.
Where it says, "Lou had one small
comment," is it your understanding there are some
documents being shifted up and back for comment?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And I've already asked you about the
other. So the next, the second page to that which
Madison. Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077549
126
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
I think repeats --
MS. STILLMAN: That's right.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
The next one is October 23rd, 1:53 from
Scott Rothstein.
MS. APRILL: Do you want to mark that?
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 11, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Again I am asking you about -- well, do
you recognize this e-mail?
A.
Yes.
Q.
This one is the same day and time but
it is from Scott Rothstein to you?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Mr. Discala and Ms. Perdue. Do you
recall receiving this?
A.
No, not really, no.
Q.
Do you recall Scott communicating with
you about some concern that this funding had to
occur or his client would not participate?
A.
Other than this e-mail, no.
Q.
Did you call him about this or respond
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL.Chicago IL 60602.p:312-379-0702
EFTA01077550
127
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
to this at all?
A.
No, not that I'm aware of, no.
Q.
Now, a minute later we have another
e-mail. I am going to skip it because I think it
is encompassed in the very next one.
MS. STILLMAN: It is the 1:56 is next?
MS. APRILL: Actually, I'm not marking that,
either.
The next one I am going to mark because
there is a lot redacted. This last one I want to
mark is October 23rd, at 3:27 p.m.
(WHEREUPON, said document was
marked Legamaro Deposition
Exhibit No. 12, for
identification, as of 3/11/11.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Sir, can you say
do you recall
receiving this?
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Do I recall, no.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Do you know where it says, "Delivery Is
Needed" on the subject line what that meant?
A.
No.
Q.
After that, the content this is from
Madison Deposition Services•70 w Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P;312-379-0702
EFTA01077551
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
:6
18
19
2C
21
22
23
24
25
Mr. Discala, right?
A.
The cover e-mail to me and others, yes.
Q.
It says, "Thank you all. Next up PPM,"
with four exclamation points.
Do you know what is being referred to
there with PPM?
A.
A private placement memorandum.
Q.
Not for the transaction that was just
funded, right?
A.
Correct.
Q.
For another transaction?
A.
A series of them, yes.
Q.
Do you know whether the attachments
that are -- well, excuse me, the redactions
represent just other e-mails?
A.
I don't know.
MS. STILLMAN: They were e-mails.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Let me understand for sure. You didn't
actually do the redacting?
A.
That's right.
Q.
Your counsel did and you can't say even
if you wanted to what is under there because you
didn't look?
A.
That's right.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077552
129
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. APRILL: What I would like to do is take
just about a minute.
MS. STILLMAN: Sure.
(WHEREUPON, a recess was had.)
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you ever communicate in any way
with a lawyer named Larry Rovin?
A.
Not that I recall.
Q.
If I tell you he is associated with
Ballamor Capital that you talked about earlier,
does that refresh your memory?
A.
It does, and I have not.
Q.
Meaning
A.
I don't know who he is. I've never
spoken to a lawyer from Ballamor Capital that I'm
aware of.
Q.
Every now or then I come up with
another name of someone who may have said hi.
Patrick Roberts, an investigator by that name?
A.
Not that I know of.
Q.
He was not mentioned to you that you
recall?
A.
Not that i recall.
Q.
Did Scott Rothstein or anybody on his
team, his firm, or those he worked with, ever
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077553
:30
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
:9
20
21
22
23
24
25
represent to you that there was fraud insurance or
any kind of insurance in place on the investments
he was --
A.
Not that I'm aware of.
Q.
Did you understand from anyone that
isn't a client of yours that there was insurance?
A.
I knew generally that insurance is
available for this sort of thing, yes.
Q.
Did you ever see anything that looked
like an insurance policy or a binder?
MS. STILLMAN: That wasn't shown to you by a
client or in a privileged capacity.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
Not in a nonprivileged capacity.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you ever speak to anyone who was to
be the broker or the agent who placed the
insurance on the investment?
A.
Not that I recall.
MS. STILLMAN: Let her finish the question,
for the court reporter.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
When you mentioned that you saw the
name Brad Edwards on the documents that you
examined in Scott Rothstein's office, do you
Madison. Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602mP:312-379-0702
EFTA01077554
131
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
recall that or was your memory refreshed by
looking at the caption of the subpoena in this
case or something else?
A.
No. I recall that he signed it on
behalf of the plaintiff. That's what I recall.
Q.
Did that prompt you to ask questions
about him with Rothstein or anybody?
A.
Not that I recall. It was one of those
strange things.
Q.
Well, it's not strange.
MS. STILLMAN: Lawyers are fungible.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
Did you notice who was representing the
defendant in the case you looked at, the --
A.
I don't recall if I did or I didn't.
Q.
After that day, do you know if you
looked in some other context, perhaps a copy in
your office or somewhere else, at any other
documents from that file?
MS. STILLMAN: You're asking if he looked at
any documents in Scott Rothstein's files?
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No, I did not.
BY MS. APRILL:
Q.
In other words, when you mentioned that
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077555
132
1
2
3
L
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
somebody had looked at the court file, either
on-line or otherwise, did they copy something for
you and show it to you?
A.
No, no.
MS. APRILL: I don't think I have any other
questions. I am kind of wrapping up. I don't
know if counsel has any.
MS. STILLMAN: Defense counsel, do you have
any questions?
MR. QUINLAN: Yes, I have a couple.
MS. STILLMAN: Do you need a break before he
goes into it?
MS. APRILL: Could we take just a minute.
(WHEREUPON, a recess was had.)
MS. STILLMAN: Just for the record, you
represent Bradley Edwards only?
MR. QUINLAN: Correct.
EXAMINATION
BY MR. QUINLAN:
Q.
Mr. Legamaro, my name is Patrick
Quinlan. I only have a couple questions for you.
The first, you relate to a discussion I
had with counsel earlier. I don't know if any of
you have seen the Chinese restaurant on Sienfeld,
but I have the strong suspicion a minute after we
Madison Deposition Services•70 a Madison 14th IL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0701
EFTA01077556
133
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
conclude the depo I am going to receive the
documents. But I don't have the documents yet.
So I want to ask you a couple questions about the
documents that have been produced in response to
the schedule attached to your subpoena, okay?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you recall seeing any documents that
were responsive to Subparagraph D of any of the
paragraphs? If you look at the schedule, you will
see the subparagraph.
Do you recall seeing any documents that
were responsive to Subparagraph D of Paragraph 1,
Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3 or Paragraph 4 of
Schedule A?
MS. STILLMAN: Let me just see if I can
clarify. Are you asking as part of our response
to the subpoena or are you asking at the office of
Rothstein?
MR. QUINLAN: Gathering documents responsive
to the subpoena.
MS. STILLMAN: Okay.
BY THE WITNESS:
A.
No, I do not recall.
BY MR. QUINLAN:
Q.
Let me break that down. Do you
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077557
134
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
recall -- now, this is not just -- I don't mean
just while you were gathering documents responsive
to the subpoena but at any time do you recall
having any correspondence that you either sent to
or received from Bradley Edwards?
A.
No.
Q.
Do you recall Bradley Edwards providing
to you any contracts and/or agreements?
A.
No. He did not.
Q.
Do you recall making any written notes
regarding any meetings that you attended that
Mr. Edwards also attended?
A.
We never attended the same meeting. I
don't know Bradley Edwards. I never met him.
Q.
I think the last one follows up on what
you just said.
You don't recall any documents being
given to you by Bradley Edwards, correct?
A.
Bradley Edwards never gave me
documents.
Q.
Have you seen recent news reports that
have linked Prince Andrew to Jeffrey Epstein?
A.
I have.
Q.
And have you seen reports that have
mentioned Bill Clinton in connection with Jeffrey
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077558
135
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Epstein?
A.
Yes, I saw those, too. Yes.
Q.
Donald Trump?
A.
Donald Trump? No, I have not seen
those.
Q.
Have you seen any reports about flight
logs showing that Epstein traveled with underaged
girls?
A.
Reports, no. You mean outside of the
context of the meeting with Scott Rothstein have
seen a report?
Q.
I'm talking about recent press reports.
A.
Recent press reports, no, : have not
seen that.
MR. QUINLAN: I don't think I have any more
questions. Thank you for your time.
MS. STILLMAN: We do not waive signature. We
are obviously not going to order it separately but
unless counsel orders it but we would like an
e-tran and four on a page with an index with the
exhibits.
MR. FREVOLA: Same for me.
MS. APRILL: The only thing I want to say is
to the extent that there is a determination made
that certain things you claim privileged for are
Madison Deposition Services•70 M Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077559
136
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
not privileged, I have no reason at this time to
say that but there is some confusion in my mind
about who clients were, we might seek further
testimony. It probably wouldn't be from you,
probably be -- I don't know what it would be but I
just wanted to say that on the record. I will let
you know if we're -- well I think we are going to
order it just regular, though. I don't need it
expedited.
MR. QUINLAN: I do want to order. You know,
I don't know what Jack's preference is on format.
Maybe give me an e-mail address or phone number to
let you know that.
MS. STILLMAN: We really need just an e-tran.
MR. QUINLAN: We'll need copies of the
exhibits.
Madison Deposition Services'70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602.P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077560
137
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.
Pro.1201 Case No. 50
2009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al.,
Defendants.
I hereby certify that I have read the
foregoing transcript of my deposition given at the
time and place aforesaid, consisting of Pages 1 to
136, inclusive, and I do again subscribe and make
oath that the same is a true, correct and complete
transcript of my deposition so given as aforesaid,
and includes changes, if any, so made by me.
before me this
day
of
, A.D. 2011.
Notary Public
Madison Deposition Servlees•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chleago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077561
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
) SS:
COUNTY OF C 0 0 K )
I, LORRAINE DUNN, a Notary Public
within and for the County of Cook, State of
Illinois, and a Certified Shorthand Reporter of
said state, do hereby certify:
That previous to the commencement of
the examination of the witness herein, the witness.
was duly sworn to testify the whole truth
concerning the matters herein;
That the foregoing deposition
transcript was reported stenographically by me,
was thereafter reduced to typewriting under my
personal direction and constitutes a true record
of the testimony given and the proceedings had;
That the said deposition was taken
before me at the time and place specified;
That I am not a relative or employee or
attorney or counsel, nor a relative or employee of
such attorney or counsel for any of the parties
hereto, nor interested directly or indirectly in
the outcome of this action.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereunto set
my hand and affix my seal of office at Chicago,
Madison Deposition Setvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077562
139
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Illinois, this 1st day of April, 2011.
Notary Public, Cook County, Illinois.
My Commission expires 12/09/2013.
C.S.R. Certificate No. 84-2024.
Madison Deposition Services•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chicago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077563
140
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
INDEX
WITNESS
BY MS. APRILL
BY MR. QUINLAN
EXHIBITS
EXAMINATION
4
132
NUMBER
Legamaro Deposition Exhibit
MARKED FOR ID
Exhibit No. 1
5
Exhibit No. 2
98
Exhibit No. 3
103
Exhibit No. 4
107
Exhibit No. 5
108
Exhibit No. 6
110
Exhibit No. 7
112
Exhibit No. 8
114
Exhibit No. 9
121
Exhibit No. 10
124
Exhibit No. 11
126
Exhibit No. 12
127
****original exhibits retained by counsel****
Madison Deposition Secvices•70 W Madison 14th FL•Chieago IL 60602•P:312-379-0702
EFTA01077564