Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01114353DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01114353
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, BRADLEY EDWARDS' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint served August 23, 2011. The Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response, and other Memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion. The Court has also reviewed the various authorities cited by the parties. Based upon review of the above, as well as being otherwise fully advised in the in premises, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: It is well established upon Motion to Dismiss that this Court is limited to a review of the four corners of the Complaint and the well pled allegations therein. A Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits the well pled facts in the Complaint and reasonable inferences therefrom and the allegations must be construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Applying this standard to the four corners of the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Court finds that the allegations are sufficient to plead a cause of action for "abuse of process" against the Defendant EDWARDS. The overwhelming majority of the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss deal with the truthfulness of the allegations against the Defendant, affirmative defenses that may be available to the Defendant, EDWARDS, as well as the references outside the four corners EFTA01114353 of the Complaint. These matters are more appropriately the subject matter of a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or defense at trial. Based upon the foregoing, the Motion to Dixtiss is hereby denied. 'fin DONE AND ORDERED this - Hay of October, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. et a DAVID F. CROW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copy furnished: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Phillips Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. FARMER, JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, MA 02116 EFTA01114354

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferences

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.