Case File
efta-efta01362017DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01362017
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01362017
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4 September 2016
US Fixed Income Weekly
Right now the decline is central bank liquidity suggest 5y5y should be closer to
2 percent or below not 3 percent to above. And this is before the Fed has
tightened and China has potentially "finished" its adjustment.
Liquidity vs. 5s I Os
30 c
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
10
20001
Fed plus fx reserves oy
20061
20121
Sato* &ocean &win LP eat Deascal•
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
Liquidity vs. 5y5y
30
7.0
•
25
Fed plus fx reserves oy --5y5y rhs
I
20
6.0
I
15
5.0
W
. 4.0
0
1 3.0
. 2.0
5
ix,
10
r
i 0.0
20001
20061
20121
Seam ft% An.) D.'IN.€n VA
And of course the breakdown in 5y5y between real and inflation reinforces the
story that it is the real rate not inflation expectations that drive this result. And
this is again consistent with the risk asset concern that it is the lack of liquidity
that undermines risk assets that in turn drives real yields lower, despite
keeping breakevens relatively inflated. One conclusion is that if investors
believe that liquidity is likely to continue to fall one should not sell real yields
but buy them and be more worried about risk assets than anything else. This
flies in the face of recent concerns that China's potential liquidation of
Treasuries for FX intervention is a Treasury negative and should drive real
yields higher. It is possible that if risk assets do very well then maybe the
correlation with interest rates is broken. But like all these relationships for us, it
is easier to work with the correlations that currently persist rather than to
predict random breaks. And the potential breaks should be more cheaply
hedged rather than making for a core portfolio allocation. I.e. cheap SPX calls
based on rates lower. More generally the simple point is that falling reserves
should be the least of worries for rates - as they have so far proven to be since
late 2014 and instead, rates need to focus more on risk assets.
Liquidity vs. 5y5y real
30 i
I 25 I
3.0
2.5
— 2.0
20 T—
Sis
w
5
I 0
I -s
-10
20001
Fed plus fx reserves yoy
5y5y real rhs
20061
1.5
1.0
0.5
-0.5
20121
t..c.a-teeg Oro
LPr Ct....v."...
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
Liquidity vs. 5y5y BEI
130
X25
I20
15 L
10
0
plus tx reserves yoy
-5
--5y5y bei rhs
-10
20001
501 "I
CY s'V Det./Xte tie*
20061
20121
Page 13
DB-SDNY-0051314
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00197498
EFTA01362017
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.