Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01362017DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01362017

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01362017
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4 September 2016 US Fixed Income Weekly Right now the decline is central bank liquidity suggest 5y5y should be closer to 2 percent or below not 3 percent to above. And this is before the Fed has tightened and China has potentially "finished" its adjustment. Liquidity vs. 5s I Os 30 c 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 10 20001 Fed plus fx reserves oy 20061 20121 Sato* &ocean &win LP eat Deascal• 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 Liquidity vs. 5y5y 30 7.0 25 Fed plus fx reserves oy --5y5y rhs I 20 6.0 I 15 5.0 W . 4.0 0 1 3.0 . 2.0 5 ix, 10 r i 0.0 20001 20061 20121 Seam ft% An.) D.'IN.€n VA And of course the breakdown in 5y5y between real and inflation reinforces the story that it is the real rate not inflation expectations that drive this result. And this is again consistent with the risk asset concern that it is the lack of liquidity that undermines risk assets that in turn drives real yields lower, despite keeping breakevens relatively inflated. One conclusion is that if investors believe that liquidity is likely to continue to fall one should not sell real yields but buy them and be more worried about risk assets than anything else. This flies in the face of recent concerns that China's potential liquidation of Treasuries for FX intervention is a Treasury negative and should drive real yields higher. It is possible that if risk assets do very well then maybe the correlation with interest rates is broken. But like all these relationships for us, it is easier to work with the correlations that currently persist rather than to predict random breaks. And the potential breaks should be more cheaply hedged rather than making for a core portfolio allocation. I.e. cheap SPX calls based on rates lower. More generally the simple point is that falling reserves should be the least of worries for rates - as they have so far proven to be since late 2014 and instead, rates need to focus more on risk assets. Liquidity vs. 5y5y real 30 i I 25 I 3.0 2.5 — 2.0 20 T— Sis w 5 I 0 I -s -10 20001 Fed plus fx reserves yoy 5y5y real rhs 20061 1.5 1.0 0.5 -0.5 20121 t..c.a-teeg Oro LPr Ct....v."... Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) Liquidity vs. 5y5y BEI 130 X25 I20 15 L 10 0 plus tx reserves yoy -5 --5y5y bei rhs -10 20001 501 "I CY s'V Det./Xte tie* 20061 20121 Page 13 DB-SDNY-0051314 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00197498 EFTA01362017

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.