Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01362018DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01362018

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01362018
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4 September 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly Even without considering the empirical relationships, it is also clear that FX intervention is very much a short term affair. As the chart below shows the recent jump in dealer positions in less than three years is consistent with the Treasury data for 2014 that shows the preponderance of foreign official Treasury holdings is held in the sub 3 year sector. Very little is held in longer dated maturities so any FX intervention is anyway more likely to flatten the yield curve than steepen it. About 56% foreign official holdings of Treasuries are under three years in maturity 60% Distribution of Maturities in Treasuries Held by Foreign Investors 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Sarce ire Deuttlie flank 3.5v ■0fficial institutions a Private Investors S :Cy too Dealer positions in Treasuries maturing in 3 years or less 30,000 20,000 g 10.030 ea .10,000 -20,000 Jam14 Soar leiteeelltramar as The relationship between central bank liquidity and the byproduct of FX reserve accumulation is clearly central to risk asset performance and therefore interest rates. The simplistic error is to assume that all assets are treated equally. They are not - or at least have not been especially since the crisis. If liquidity weakens and risk assets trade badly, rates are most likely to rally not sell off. It doesn't matter how many Treasury bills are redeemed or USD cash is liquidated from foreign central bank assets, US rates are more likely to fall than rise especially further out the curve. In some ways this really shouldn't be that hard to appreciate. After all central bank liquidity drives broader measures of liquidity that also drives, with a lag, economic activity. The indicators of excess liquidity (see below) are but derivatives of central bank liquidity and the bank or "inside" money multipliers. If liquidity is tightening relatively to nominal growth, real growth will tend to slowdown later. Right now the message is not good for the OECD, excess liquidity indicators point to real growth losing momentum. The IMF seems to get the picture. China is probably getting the picture but faces the conundrum of how to manage the carry trade unwind with minimal disruption. The grass is definitely though greener if the currency is weaker and they hang onto most of their reserves. Ironically the excess liquidity indicator has recently improved for China although this is as much to do with decelerating nominal growth. Page 14 Jul•14 —Dealer Net Outright Poston: Govt Coupon Secunhes,Oue 3- Yr or Less(EOP.M4) Jan-15 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0051315 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00197499 EFTA01362018

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.