Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01660362DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01660362

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01660362
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: FW: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:04:59 +0000 Importance: Normal Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:52 PM To: Cc: Su . Hopefully you had a good trip. I assume we cannot answer any of these questions, but please let us know. Thanks. Jeff From: Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:49 PM To: Subject: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Hello Jeffrey, Thank you for calling me today. I am confused about certain legal issues. When I asked this morning why Jeffrey Epstein was not charged with child sex trafficking given the 2000 TVPA federal laws, she did not want to respond. It s an important question that merits a substantial answer. In light of the arguments surrounding the case I would like to know: I. Why was Jeffrey Epstein allowed to plead guilty to a single count of solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution? 2. In light of the 5 trafficking offenses outlined on pages 1 & 2 of the NPA signed 10/29/07, why was Epstein given a twelve (12) months and six (6) months in a county jail (he served only 13 months), for all charges without adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control? 3. Unlike any other registered sex offender in the U.S. prison system today why didn't he serve time in a State penitentiary? Why was Epstein placed in a solitary cell at the West Palm Beach Stockade and only part time? Why was he allowed to go to "work" outside of prison for 13 months during the entire day? EFTA01660362 4. Why didn't Epstein like all other registered sex offenders in the U.S. have an attached electronic monitor during his house confinement? 5. Why was prosecution for the offenses deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida? 6. In the ADDENDUM to the NPA (7A-C), Epstein is given the right to select and approve independent third party counselors for the victims. Why? 7.According to the NPA signed by MV there are 5 federal trafficking offenses. Why were they dismissed or deferred? 8. Why is Epstein given the right to contest damages up to an amount agreed to between the victims and Epstein? 9. Esptein's signature on NPA "is not to be construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability or a waiver of..." Please explain. Why? 10. What was the "gain time" Epstein earned during his period of incarceration? 11. Why would the NPA not be part of a public record? And why would the US have to provide notice to Epstein before making disclosure under a FOIA request? 12. Why was the Federal Grand Jury investigation suspended? 13. Wh the the US a e not to institute any criminal charges a ainst his co conspirators Ghislaine Maxwell, , Lesley Groff and in light of the evidence? 14. Why are the grand jury subpoenas going to be withdrawn at the completion of the terms of the NPA? given that he is a registered sex offender and that most probably he will commit the crimes shortly after his release next month (this assumption based on empirical and medical data obtained from registered sex offenders), there seems to be no protection mechanism for the victims in place? 15. Why was JE allowed to choose the attorney's for the victims and put a cap on their restitution? 16. Why was the Federal investigation stopped by the USAG? 17. Why hasn't Epstein been rearrested given the 11+ parole violations reported to the parole board since his home confinement including weekly trips to NY and helicpter ride to travel only 9 miles? Sincerely, The message and any attachment may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy or distribute this message or any attachments and we ask that you please delete this message and any attachments and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person (s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentially or a privilege. EFTA01660363

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01684300

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01654937

0p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01649143

0p
Court UnsealedFeb 5, 2021

Maxwell NPA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) ----------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue N

38p
Court UnsealedApr 11, 2025

Maxwell Petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

159p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.