Defense argues Giuffre mother's deposition statement lacks reputational impact

Summary

Defense argues Giuffre mother's deposition statement lacks reputational impact The passage merely discusses a procedural argument about the relevance of a mother's deposition testimony in a defamation case. It mentions no new evidence, financial flows, or high‑level officials, and offers no actionable leads beyond standard courtroom strategy. Key insights: The defense questions whether a 2016 deposition comment about Giuffre's behavior in 1999‑2001 can be deemed defamatory.; The argument focuses on the lack of public dissemination of the mother's statement.; No specific dates, transactions, or powerful actors are introduced.