Court discussion on admissibility of Giuffre's psychiatric records

Summary

Court discussion on admissibility of Giuffre's psychiatric records The passage mentions a procedural argument about excluding psychiatric testimony related to Ms. Giuffre, but provides no concrete names of powerful officials, financial transactions, or novel allegations. It offers a modest lead for investigators to review evidentiary rulings, yet lacks actionable details beyond the case context. Key insights: Reference to Ms. Giuffre's disclosure to Dr. Kliman and Dr. Miller; Argument that psychiatric records may be prejudicial under Rule 403; Potential strategy to exclude reputational evidence in trial