Attorney argues evidentiary rules on business records and hearsay in court hearing
Attorney argues evidentiary rules on business records and hearsay in court hearing The passage is a routine courtroom discussion about evidentiary standards and does not mention any high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or alleged misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for further investigation. Key insights: Counsel cites rules of evidence regarding business and government record exceptions.; Claims that second‑ and third‑hand hearsay in police reports is inadmissible.; Describes practice of keeping discovery materials as business records.
Summary
Attorney argues evidentiary rules on business records and hearsay in court hearing The passage is a routine courtroom discussion about evidentiary standards and does not mention any high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or alleged misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for further investigation. Key insights: Counsel cites rules of evidence regarding business and government record exceptions.; Claims that second‑ and third‑hand hearsay in police reports is inadmissible.; Describes practice of keeping discovery materials as business records.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.