Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-012169House Oversight

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-012169
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case The passage alleges that senior U.S. Attorney Office staff (AUSA Weinstein, FAUSA Sloman, U.S. Attorney Acosta) disclosed case‑specific information and possibly offered financial inducements to witnesses in the Epstein prosecution, suggesting improper motives and potential violations of Department policy. These claims point to concrete individuals, internal communications, and specific actions that merit further investigation, though the document provides limited direct evidence and no new financial transaction details. Key insights: AUSA Weinstein allegedly disclosed plea‑negotiation details and warned a defense‑contact about media coverage.; FAUSA Sloman reportedly sent non‑case‑specific information to defense, contradicting internal policy.; Defense counsel complained to the USAO about leaks to the New York Times.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancejeffrey-epsteinprosecutorial-misconductu.s.-attorney-officewhistleblowerlegal-ethics
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

05/16/2008 11:16 FAX

05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ram Criminal Division Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section NW ; ppm .: as gton, DC 205M-0(1001 TO: Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. OFFICE NUMBER: CEOS: FAX: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. FAX NUMBER: FROM: Alexandra Gelber DATE/TIME: May 16, 2008 OFFICE NUMBER: NUMBER OF PAGES, EXCLUDING THIS SHEET: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: EFTA00214480 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division hief Child &Nedra:tun end Oknewthy Saellon May 15, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict crim

6p
OtherUnknown

J78repsc

J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG MARC FERNICH Attorneys for Defendant Also Present: - Special Agent FBI - NYPD KEYANA POMPEY - Probation Officer LEA HARMON - Probation Officer 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 8, 2019 2:00 p.m. District Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00083852 J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE COURT: Good afternoon. I think I'm pretty much up to speed as to where you are in the sense that I am aware that you have been before Magistrate Judge Pitman earlier thi

18p
OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def

56p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

J78repsc

J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG MARC FERNICH Attorneys for Defendant Also Present: - Special Agent FBI - NYPD - Probation Officer - Probation Officer 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 8, 2019 2:00 p.m. District Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00085745 J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE COURT: Good afternoon. I think I'm pretty much up to speed as to where you are in the sense that I am aware that you have been before Magistrate Judge Pitman earlier this morning

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.