Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-013942House Oversight

Internal memo outlining a staged request for increased remote work days

Internal memo outlining a staged request for increased remote work days The passage details a low‑level employee (Sherwood) negotiating remote‑work arrangements with his direct supervisor. It contains no references to high‑ranking officials, financial misconduct, foreign influence, or any controversial actions. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads of significance. Key insights: Sherwood requests a two‑day remote‑work trial, then plans to expand to four days.; He uses performance metrics to justify increased remote work.; The dialogue illustrates a staged negotiation tactic (bracketing) to gain concessions.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013942
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Internal memo outlining a staged request for increased remote work days The passage details a low‑level employee (Sherwood) negotiating remote‑work arrangements with his direct supervisor. It contains no references to high‑ranking officials, financial misconduct, foreign influence, or any controversial actions. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads of significance. Key insights: Sherwood requests a two‑day remote‑work trial, then plans to expand to four days.; He uses performance metrics to justify increased remote work.; The dialogue illustrates a staged negotiation tactic (bracketing) to gain concessions.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightremote-workemployee-negotiationsoffice-policy

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
serious or irreversible ©! Sherwood knocks on his boss’s office door around 3 P.M. on a relatively relaxed Thursday, July 27, the week after his absence, and his script looks like the following. Stock phrases are underlined and footnotes explain negotiating points. Sherwood: Hi, Bill. Do you have a quick second? Bill: Sure. What’s up? Sherwood: [ just wanted to bounce an idea off of you that’s been on my mind. Two minutes should be plenty. Bill: OK. Shoot. Sherwood: Last week, as you know, I was sick. Long story short, I decided to work at home despite feeling terrible. So here’s the funny part. I thought I would get nothing done, but ended up finishing three more designs than usual on both days. Plus, I put in three more billable hours than usual without the commute, office noise, distractions, etc. OK, so here’s where I’m going. Just as a trial, I’d like to propose working from home Mondays and Tuesdays for just two weeks. You can veto it whenever you want, and I’ll come in if we need to do meetings, but I'd like to try it for just two weeks and review the results. ’m 100% confident that Pll get twice as much done. Does that seem reasonable? Bill: Hmm ... What if we need to share client designs? Sherwood: There’s a program called GoToMyPC that I used to access the office computer when I was sick. I can view everything remotely, and I'll have my cell phone on me 24/7. Sooooo ... What do you think? Test it out starting next Monday and see how much more I get done?& Bill: Ummm ... OK, fine. But it’s just a test. I have a meeting in five and have to run, but let’s talk soon. Sherwood: Great. Thanks for the time. [ll keep you posted on it all. ’'m sure you'll be pleasantly surprised. Sherwood didn’t expect to get two days per week approved. He asked for two so that, in the case his boss refused, he could ask for just one as a fallback position (bracketing). Why didn’t Sherwood go for five days remote per week? Two reasons. First, it’s a lot for management to accept off the bat. We need to ask for an inch and turn it into a foot without setting off panic alarms. Second, it is a good idea to hone your remote-working abilities—rehearse a bit—before shooting for the big time, as it decreases the likelihood of crises and screwups that will get remote rights revoked. Step 5: Expand Remote Time Sherwood ensures that his days outside of the office are his most productive to date, even minimally dropping in-office production to heighten the contrast. He sets a meeting to discuss the results with his boss on August 15 and prepares a bullet-point page detailing increased results and items completed compared to in-office time. He suggests upping the ante to four days per week remote for a two-week trial, fully prepared to concede to three days if need be. Sherwood: It really turned out even better than I expected. If you look at the numbers, it makes a lot of business sense, and I’m enjoying work a lot more now. So, here we are. I'd like to suggest, if you think it makes sense, that I try four days a week for another two-week trial. I was thinking that coming in Friday®would make sense to prepare for the coming week, but we could do whichever day you prefer. Bill: Sherwood, I’m really not sure we can do that.

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01358956

Page 23 874 F.3d 787, *; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596, fl; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 borrower to compensate for the opportunity costs of the loan, the risk of inflation, and the relatively slight risk of default. A bankruptcy court should then hold a hearing to determine a proper plan-specific risk adjustment to that prime rate, at which the debtor and any creditors may present evidence. Using this approach, courts have generally approved adjustments above the pri

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein’s Elite Network and Unverified Claims of Government ‘Bounty Hunting’

The passage lists numerous high‑profile individuals and institutions linked to Epstein, providing names and affiliations that could be pursued for financial or influence investigations. However, it la Epstein claimed to have worked as a “bounty hunter” recovering money for the government or wealthy c He was a limited partner at Bear Stearns under mentorship of Ace Greenberg and James Cayne. Member

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
OtherUnknown

AT&T

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01342688

15p
House OversightUnknown

Religious Humanism and Historical Theological Debate – No Evident Investigative Leads

Religious Humanism and Historical Theological Debate – No Evident Investigative Leads The document discusses historical philosophy and theology with no mention of contemporary actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for investigation and contains no sensitive or novel allegations involving powerful individuals or institutions. Key insights: Describes the transmission of Aristotle's works among Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in medieval Spain and Sicily.; References scholarly works by Richard Rubinstein, Anders Nygren, and others on religious humanism and the agape‑eros‑caritas debate.; Highlights the tension between Christian concepts of love (agape) and secular/philosophical notions (eros).

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.