Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Counsel List Filing in House Oversight Case (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)Counsel List Filing in House Oversight Case (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)
Counsel List Filing in House Oversight Case (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM) The document merely lists attorneys and contact information for parties in a House oversight lawsuit. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile officials, making it low‑value for investigative leads. Key insights: Identifies counsel for Alan M. Dershowitz in the case.; Provides contact details for multiple law firms (Wiley Rein, Sweder & Ross, Cole, Scott & Kissane).; References a House Oversight docket (03/24/2015).
Summary
Counsel List Filing in House Oversight Case (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM) The document merely lists attorneys and contact information for parties in a House oversight lawsuit. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile officials, making it low‑value for investigative leads. Key insights: Identifies counsel for Alan M. Dershowitz in the case.; Provides contact details for multiple law firms (Wiley Rein, Sweder & Ross, Cole, Scott & Kissane).; References a House Oversight docket (03/24/2015).
Persons Referenced (6)
“submitted, /s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Paul H. Schoeman, Esq.“submitted, /s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Jacqui Safra“ar No. 149100 [email protected] Steven R. Safra, Esq. Florida Bar No. 057028 Steven.safra@cskleg”
[Redacted] Esq.“submitted, /s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Larry Page“Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 27 of objections and the General Objections, Def”
Alan Dershowitz“19-7000 Fax: (202) 719-7049 Counsel for Alan M. Dershowitz 12 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014110”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM The document is a routine certificate of service confirming delivery of legal papers to counsel. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile actors beyond listing attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz, which is already public knowledge. Consequently, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Served on February 23, 2015 to Jack Scarola and Searcy Denny law firm.; Counsel listed includes Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.; Client named is Alan M. Dershowitz.
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such documents after multiple discovery requests. The passage ties Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other high‑profile figures, and highlights possible obstruction of discovery and false public statements—both actionable legal leads and potentially explosive public controversy if verified. Key insights: Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" disproving the allegations.; Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections.; The motion cites the CVRA claim that Jane Doe #3 alleges sexual trafficking by Epstein, Prince Andrew and Dershowitz.
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
The document is a routine certificate of service confirming delivery of legal papers to counsel. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile actors beyond Served on February 23, 2015 to Jack Scarola and Searcy Denny law firm. Counsel listed includes Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. Client named is Alan M. Dershowitz.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.