Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAMCertificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM The document is a routine certificate of service confirming delivery of legal papers to counsel. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile actors beyond listing attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz, which is already public knowledge. Consequently, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Served on February 23, 2015 to Jack Scarola and Searcy Denny law firm.; Counsel listed includes Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.; Client named is Alan M. Dershowitz.
Summary
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM The document is a routine certificate of service confirming delivery of legal papers to counsel. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile actors beyond listing attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz, which is already public knowledge. Consequently, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Served on February 23, 2015 to Jack Scarola and Searcy Denny law firm.; Counsel listed includes Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.; Client named is Alan M. Dershowitz.
Persons Referenced (7)
“373-2294 By:/s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Paul H. Schoeman, Esq.“373-2294 By:/s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Jacqui Safra“ar No. 149100 [email protected] Steven R. Safra, Esq. Florida Bar No. 057028 Steven.safra@csklega”
[Redacted] Esq.“373-2294 By:/s/ Thomas E. Scott Thomas E. Scott, Esq. Florida Bar No. 149100 [email protected]”
Jack Scarola“via E- Serve this 23rd day of February, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al., [email protected]”
Larry Page“Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 28 of 34 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERT”
Alan Dershowitz“COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. Attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz Dadeland Centre II, 14th Floor 9150 South Dadelan”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Certificate of Service for House Oversight Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
The document is a routine certificate of service confirming delivery of legal papers to counsel. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑profile actors beyond Served on February 23, 2015 to Jack Scarola and Searcy Denny law firm. Counsel listed includes Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. Client named is Alan M. Dershowitz.
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such documents after multiple discovery requests. The passage ties Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other high‑profile figures, and highlights possible obstruction of discovery and false public statements—both actionable legal leads and potentially explosive public controversy if verified. Key insights: Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" disproving the allegations.; Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections.; The motion cites the CVRA claim that Jane Doe #3 alleges sexual trafficking by Epstein, Prince Andrew and Dershowitz.
Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe
Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe The filing reveals a potential legal strategy to involve state and federal prosecutors in investigating perjury by a key witness who claimed to have been on Jeffrey Epstein’s island with former President Clinton. It provides concrete follow‑up steps (disclosure to the State Attorney and U.S. Attorney), names specific actors (Dershowitz, Roberts, Clinton, Epstein), and suggests a possible criminal inquiry, making it a strong lead. However, the claim is already widely reported and the filing itself is a procedural motion, limiting its novelty and direct evidence of misconduct. Key insights: Dershowitz requests permission to share the sealed deposition with investigative authorities.; The deposition concerns [REDACTED - Survivor]’s affidavit alleging presence on Epstein’s island with former President Clinton.; The motion cites a Jan 12 2016 Confidentiality Order that currently blocks disclosure.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.