Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case

Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case The passage discusses routine litigation procedural issues—whether additional anonymous plaintiffs (Jane Doe 3 and 4) should be added and standing under the CVRA. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, agencies, or financial flows, offering no actionable leads beyond standard case‑law citations. Key insights: Petitioners argue Jane Doe 3 and 4 need not be listed as parties for the case to proceed.; Government claims Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was unknown when the non‑prosecution agreement was negotiated.; Court has not yet ruled on the relevance or admissibility of attestations from Jane Doe 3 and 4.