Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case

Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case The passage discusses routine litigation procedural issues-whether additional anonymous plaintiffs (Jane Doe 3 and 4) should be added and standing under the CVRA. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, agencies, or financial flows, offering no actionable leads beyond standard case‑law citations. Key insights: Petitioners argue Jane Doe 3 and 4 need not be listed as parties for the case to proceed.; Government claims Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was unknown when the non‑prosecution agreement was negotiated.; Court has not yet ruled on the relevance or admissibility of attestations from Jane Doe 3 and 4.