Anne Milgram promotes algorithmic risk‑assessment tools in criminal justiceCritique of Proprietary Algorithms in Criminal Justice and Their Legal Implications
Case File
kaggle-ho-016382House OversightHistorical essay on scientific objectivity and expert judgment
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-016382
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
Historical essay on scientific objectivity and expert judgment The text is a scholarly discussion of scientific representation practices with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial flows, or alleged misconduct. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Describes shift from idealized illustration to hands‑off scientific imaging in the 19th century.; Notes resurgence of expert judgment in the 1930s–1940s for complex data interpretation.; No references to political figures, agencies, or controversial actions.
Tags
kagglehouse-oversightscience-historyobjectivityexpert-judgment
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.