Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-016383House Oversight

Critique of Proprietary Algorithms in Criminal Justice and Their Legal Implications

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-016383
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Critique of Proprietary Algorithms in Criminal Justice and Their Legal Implications The passage discusses general concerns about trade‑secret algorithms in sentencing and law enforcement, citing academic sources but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads involving high‑profile officials or agencies. Key insights: Algorithms are increasingly used in sentencing and parole decisions across U.S. states.; Trade‑secret algorithms can hinder defendants' ability to challenge evidence.; Proprietary algorithms may embed proxies for race or socioeconomic status.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightalgorithmic-sentencingtrade-secretscriminal-justice-reformlegal-transparencypredictive-analytics
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.